Abstract
The article considers, in a historical setting, the links between varieties of nominalism—the extreme nominalism of the Quine-Goodman variety and the trope nominalism current today—and types of idealism. In so doing arguments of various twentieth century figures, including Husserl, Bradley, Russell, and Sartre, as well as a contemporary attack on relations by Peter Simons are critically examined. The paper seeks to link the rejection of realism about universals with the rejection of a mind-independent “world”—in short, linking nominalism with idealism.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Husserl characterized the view of Cornelius as “modern Humeanism,” (1970, pp. 419–425), and refers to Meinong’s argument—“This would seem in essentials to be Meinong’s argument….”—as being in Zeitschrift für Psychologie und Physiologie der Sinnesorgane, vol. 21, p. 235.
Wetterström (1995, p. 10) (from a translation in progress by H. Malmgren).
In the contemporary scenario this connects to claims about “causal chains” to establish having a linguistic and conceptual apparatus.
See the reference to J. A. Wheeler below.
Sartre (1956, p. xlvii).
Sartre (1956, p. xlvii).
Sartre (1956, p. 1).
Sartre (1956, p. li).
Sartre (1956, p. lii).
Sartre (1956, p. lvii).
Sartre (1956, p. lix).
Sartre (1956, p. lx).
Sartre (1956, p. lxiv).
Sartre (1956, p. lxv).
If I recall rightly, Wheeler once arranged for the funding of the Philosophy Department’s having Dagfin Føllesdahl come to Austin, Texas for a colloquium setting out a Quinean type perspective on experience, language and theory.
Overbye (2002).
Simons (2010, p. 204). While it would be interesting to consider Sartre and Russell on negation at this point, space is fortunately “absent.”
In the logical atomism lectures. It is not clear if Simons is suggesting something like Russell’s later 1925 view that suggests avoiding negative facts via universal generalizations—no atomic fact is such that …, or, alternatively, every atomic fact is either … or …. or …. On this see Hochberg (2002, pp. 283–287).
Simons (2010, p. 204).
Simons (2010, p. 208).
Simons (2010, pp. 209–210).
Whether that is illusory and they are “really one” or can be construed as a “identical” is a wild form of monism we need not pursue here.
Simons (2010, p. 203).
Russell (1956, p. 220).
Russell (1956, p. 220).
For the details of the pattern see Hochberg (1978, Chap. IV). In keeping with that pattern I have used "predicate" in the familiar ambiguous way.
References
Bradley FH (1969) Appearance and reality. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Goodman N (1951) The structure of appearance. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Hochberg H (1978) Thought, fact, and reference: the origins and ontology of logical atomism. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis
Hochberg H (1988) A refutation of moderate nominalism. Australasian J Phil 66(2):188–207
Hochberg H (1992) Troubles with tropes. Phil Stud 67(2):193–195
Hochberg H (2002) From logic to ontology: some problems of predication, negation and possibility, a companion to philosophical logic (ed. D. Jacquette). Blackwell, Oxford, pp 181–192
Husserl E (1970) Logical investigations (trans. J. N. Findlay), vol 1. Routledge and Kegan Paul, London
Marc-Wogau K (1936) Inhalt und Umfang des Begriffs. Almquist & Wiksells, Uppsala
Moore GE (1900/1901) Identity. Proc Aristotelian Soc 1:121–145
Overbye D (2002) Peering through the gates of time. The New York Times, March, 12
Russell BAW (1927) The analysis of matter. Harcourt Brace, New York
Russell BAW (1940) An inquiry into meaning and truth. George Allen & Unwin, London
Russell BAW (1948) Human knowledge: its scope and limits. George Allen & Unwin, London
Russell BAW (1956) The principles of mathematics. George Allen & Unwin Ltd, London
Sartre JP (1956) Being and nothingness, (trans. H. Barnes). Philosophical Library, New York
Segelberg I (1999) Properties. In: Three essays in phenomenology and ontology (trans. H. Hochberg &. S. Hochberg), Thales, Stockholm
Simons P (2010) Relations and truthmaking. Aristotelian Soc Suppl Vol 10:199–213
von Aster E (1913) Prinzipien der Erkenntnislehre. Quelle & Meyer, Leipzig
Wetterström T (1995) Om Ivar Segelberg, medvetandet och världen. Filosofiska Tidskrift 4:5–25, 10 (Trans. Manuscript, H. Malmgren)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hochberg, H. Nominalism and Idealism. Axiomathes 23, 213–234 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10516-011-9150-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10516-011-9150-3