Skip to main content
Log in

Nominalism and Idealism

  • Invited Paper
  • Published:
Axiomathes Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The article considers, in a historical setting, the links between varieties of nominalism—the extreme nominalism of the Quine-Goodman variety and the trope nominalism current today—and types of idealism. In so doing arguments of various twentieth century figures, including Husserl, Bradley, Russell, and Sartre, as well as a contemporary attack on relations by Peter Simons are critically examined. The paper seeks to link the rejection of realism about universals with the rejection of a mind-independent “world”—in short, linking nominalism with idealism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Husserl characterized the view of Cornelius as “modern Humeanism,” (1970, pp. 419–425), and refers to Meinong’s argument—“This would seem in essentials to be Meinong’s argument….”—as being in Zeitschrift für Psychologie und Physiologie der Sinnesorgane, vol. 21, p. 235.

  2. Segelberg (1999, 177) cites the argument being used earlier by von Aster (1913, p. 126), and Marc-Wogau (1936, p. 139).

  3. Goodmann did not note Russell’s discussion or Russell’s generalization of the problem that led him to observe that, for the example cited above, with three properties, a triadic similarity relation would be required to specify correlate classes Goodman (1951), Russell (1940, 1948).

  4. Wetterström (1995, p. 10) (from a translation in progress by H. Malmgren).

  5. In the contemporary scenario this connects to claims about “causal chains” to establish having a linguistic and conceptual apparatus.

  6. See the reference to J. A. Wheeler below.

  7. Sartre (1956, p. xlvii).

  8. Sartre (1956, p. xlvii).

  9. Sartre (1956, p. 1).

  10. Sartre (1956, p. li).

  11. Sartre (1956, p. lii).

  12. Sartre (1956, p. lvii).

  13. Sartre (1956, p. lix).

  14. Sartre (1956, p. lx).

  15. Sartre (1956, p. lxiv).

  16. Sartre (1956, p. lxv).

  17. If I recall rightly, Wheeler once arranged for the funding of the Philosophy Department’s having Dagfin Føllesdahl come to Austin, Texas for a colloquium setting out a Quinean type perspective on experience, language and theory.

  18. Overbye (2002).

  19. For example, see Hochberg (1988, 1992).

  20. Simons (2010, p. 204). While it would be interesting to consider Sartre and Russell on negation at this point, space is fortunately “absent.”

  21. In the logical atomism lectures. It is not clear if Simons is suggesting something like Russell’s later 1925 view that suggests avoiding negative facts via universal generalizations—no atomic fact is such that …, or, alternatively, every atomic fact is either … or …. or …. On this see Hochberg (2002, pp. 283–287).

  22. Simons (2010, p. 204).

  23. Simons (2010, p. 208).

  24. Simons (2010, pp. 209–210).

  25. Whether that is illusory and they are “really one” or can be construed as a “identical” is a wild form of monism we need not pursue here.

  26. Simons (2010, p. 203).

  27. Russell (1956, p. 220).

  28. Russell (1956, p. 220).

  29. For the details of the pattern see Hochberg (1978, Chap. IV). In keeping with that pattern I have used "predicate" in the familiar ambiguous way.

References

  • Bradley FH (1969) Appearance and reality. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman N (1951) The structure of appearance. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Hochberg H (1978) Thought, fact, and reference: the origins and ontology of logical atomism. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis

    Google Scholar 

  • Hochberg H (1988) A refutation of moderate nominalism. Australasian J Phil 66(2):188–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hochberg H (1992) Troubles with tropes. Phil Stud 67(2):193–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hochberg H (2002) From logic to ontology: some problems of predication, negation and possibility, a companion to philosophical logic (ed. D. Jacquette). Blackwell, Oxford, pp 181–192

    Google Scholar 

  • Husserl E (1970) Logical investigations (trans. J. N. Findlay), vol 1. Routledge and Kegan Paul, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Marc-Wogau K (1936) Inhalt und Umfang des Begriffs. Almquist & Wiksells, Uppsala

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore GE (1900/1901) Identity. Proc Aristotelian Soc 1:121–145

  • Overbye D (2002) Peering through the gates of time. The New York Times, March, 12

  • Russell BAW (1927) The analysis of matter. Harcourt Brace, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell BAW (1940) An inquiry into meaning and truth. George Allen & Unwin, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell BAW (1948) Human knowledge: its scope and limits. George Allen & Unwin, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell BAW (1956) The principles of mathematics. George Allen & Unwin Ltd, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Sartre JP (1956) Being and nothingness, (trans. H. Barnes). Philosophical Library, New York

  • Segelberg I (1999) Properties. In: Three essays in phenomenology and ontology (trans. H. Hochberg &. S. Hochberg), Thales, Stockholm

  • Simons P (2010) Relations and truthmaking. Aristotelian Soc Suppl Vol 10:199–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Aster E (1913) Prinzipien der Erkenntnislehre. Quelle & Meyer, Leipzig

    Google Scholar 

  • Wetterström T (1995) Om Ivar Segelberg, medvetandet och världen. Filosofiska Tidskrift 4:5–25, 10 (Trans. Manuscript, H. Malmgren)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Herbert Hochberg.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hochberg, H. Nominalism and Idealism. Axiomathes 23, 213–234 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10516-011-9150-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10516-011-9150-3

Keywords

Navigation