Skip to main content
Log in

Psychometric Properties of the Sexual Excitation/Sexual Inhibition Inventory for Women in a German Sample

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Archives of Sexual Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Sexual Excitation Sexual/Inhibition Inventory for Women (SESII-W) is a self-report questionnaire for assessing propensities of sexual excitation (SE) and sexual inhibition (SI) in women. According to the dual control model of sexual response, these two factors differ between individuals and influence the occurrence of sexual arousal in given situations. Extreme levels of SE and SI are postulated to be associated with sexual problems or risky sexual behaviors. Psychometric evaluation of the original scale yielded two higher order and eight lower order factors as well as satisfactory to good construct validity and reliability. The present study was designed to assess the psychometric properties of a German version of the SESII-W utilizing a large convenience sample of 2206 women. Confirmatory factor analysis showed a satisfactory overall model fit, with support for the five lower order factors of SE (Arousability, Sexual Power Dynamics, Smell, Partner Characteristics, Setting) and the three lower order factors of SI (Relationship Importance, Arousal Contingency, and Concerns about Sexual Function). Additionally, the scale demonstrated good convergent and discriminant validity, internal consistency, and test–retest-reliability. The German SESII-W is a sufficiently reliable and valid measure for assessing SE and SI in women. Hence, its use can be recommended for future research in Germany that investigates women’s sexual behaviors and experiences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bancroft, J. (1999). Central inhibition of sexual response in the male: A theoretical perspective. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 23, 763–784.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bancroft, J. (2009). Human sexuality and its problems (3rd ed.). Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone/Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bancroft, J., & Janssen, E. (2000). The dual control model of male sexual response: A theoretical approach to centrally mediated erectile dysfunction. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 24, 571–579.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bancroft, J., Janssen, E., Strong, D., Carnes, L., Vukadinovic, Z., & Long, J. S. (2003). Sexual risk-taking in gay men: The relevance of sexual arousability, mood, and sensation seeking. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 32, 555–572.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Berner, M. M., Kriston, L., Zahradnik, H.-P., Härter, M., & Rohde, A. (2004). Überprüfung der Gültigkeit und Zuverlässigkeit des deutschen Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI-d) [Inspection of the validity and reliability of the German Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI-d)]. Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde, 64, 293–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bjorklund, D. F., & Kipp, K. (1996). Parental investment theory and gender differences in the evolution of inhibition mechanisms. Psychological Bulletin, 120, 163–188.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bloemendaal, L. B. A., & Laan, E. T. M. (2015). The psychometric properties of the Sexual Excitation/Sexual Inhibition Inventory for Women (SESII-W) within a Dutch population. Journal of Sex Research, 52, 69–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bostwick, W. B., Boyd, C. J., Hughes, T. L., & McCabe, S. E. (2010). Dimensions of sexual orientation and the prevalence of mood and anxiety disorders in the United States. American Journal of Public Health, 100, 468–475.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Both, S., Brauer, M., & Laan, E. (2011). Classical conditioning of sexual response in women: A replication study. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 8, 3116–3131.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, D., Janssen, E., Graham, C., Vorst, H., & Wicherts, J. (2008). Women’s scores on the Sexual Inhibition/Sexual Excitation Scales (SIS/SES): Gender similarities and differences. Journal of Sex Research, 45, 36–48.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carver, C. S., & White, T. L. (1994). Behavioral inhibition, behavioral activation, and affective responses to impending reward and punishment: The BIS/BAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 319–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandra, A. (2011). Sexual behavior, sexual attraction, and sexual identity in the United States: Data from the 2006–2008 National Survey of Family Growth. US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics.

  • Evans, J. R., & Mathur, A. (2005). The value of online surveys. Internet Research, 15, 195–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forbes, M. K., Baillie, A. J., & Schniering, C. A. (2014). Critical flaws in the Female Sexual Function Index and the International Index of Erectile Function. Journal of Sex Research, 51, 485–491.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, C. A., Sanders, S. A., & Milhausen, R. R. (2006). The Sexual Excitation/Sexual Inhibition Inventory for Women: Psychometric properties. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 35, 397–409.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, C. A., Sanders, S. A., Milhausen, R. R., & McBride, K. R. (2004). Turning on and turning off: A focus group study of the factors that affect women’s sexual arousal. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 33, 527–538.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gunter, B., Nicholas, D., Huntington, P., & Williams, P. (2002). Online versus offline research: Implications for evaluating digital media. Aslib Proceedings, 54, 229–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammelstein, P. (2005). Die deutschsprachige Version der Sexual Sensation Seeking Scale und der Sexual Compulsivity Scale [The German Version of the Sexual Sensation Seeking Scale and the Sexual Compulsivity Scale]. Zeitschrift für Sexualforschung, 18, 135–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoerger, M. (2010). Participant dropout as a function of survey length in internet-mediated university studies: Implications for study design and voluntary participation in psychological research. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 13, 697–700.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, L.-T., & Bentler, P. M. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3, 424–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IBM. (2012). IBM SPSS statistics for macintosh. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janssen, E., Vorst, H., Finn, P., & Bancroft, J. (2002a). The Sexual Inhibition (SIS) and Sexual Excitation (SES) Scales: I. Measuring sexual inhibition and excitation proneness in men. Journal of Sex Research, 39, 114–126.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Janssen, E., Vorst, H., Finn, P., & Bancroft, J. (2002b). The Sexual Inhibition (SIS) and Sexual Excitation (SES) Scales: II. Predicting psychophysiological response patterns. Journal of Sex Research, 39, 127–132.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kalichman, S. C., Johnson, J. R., Adair, V., Rompa, D., Multhauf, K., & Kelly, J. A. (1994). Sexual sensation seeking: Scale development and predicting AIDS-risk behavior among homosexually active men. Journal of Personality Assessment, 62, 385–397.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • MacCallum, R. C., Browne, M. W., & Sugawara, H. M. (1996). Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods, 1, 130–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, R. P., & Ho, M.-H. R. (2002). Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analyses. Psychological Methods, 7, 64–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Milhausen, R. R., Graham, C. A., Sanders, S. A., Yarber, W. L., & Maitland, S. B. (2010). Validation of the Sexual Excitation/Sexual Inhibition Inventory for Women and Men. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39, 1091–1104.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mîndrilă, D. (2010). Maximum likelihood (ML) and diagonally weighted least squares (DWLS) estimation procedures: A comparison of estimation bias with ordinal and multivariate non-normal data. International Journal of Digital Society, 1, 60–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muise, A., Milhausen, R. R., Cole, S. L., & Graham, C. (2013). Sexual compulsivity in heterosexual married adults: The role of sexual excitation and sexual inhibition in individuals not considered “high-risk”. Sexual Addiction & Compulsivity, 20, 192–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Musch, J., Brockhaus, R., & Bröder, A. (2002). Ein Inventar zur Erfassung von zwei Faktoren sozialer Erwünschtheit [An inventory for assessing two factors of social desirability]. Diagnostica, 48, 121–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paulhus, D. L., & Reid, D. B. (1991). Enhancement and denial in socially desirable responding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 307–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinxten, W., & Lievens, J. (2014). An exploratory study of factors associated with sexual inhibition and excitation: Findings from a representative survey in Flanders. Journal of Sex Research. doi:10.1080/00224499.2014.882880.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • R Development Core Team. (2010). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing Retrieved from http://www.r-project.org.

  • Rosen, C., Brown, J., Heiman, S., Leiblum, C., Meston, R., Shabsigh, D., & D’Agostino, R. (2000). The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI): A multidimensional self-report instrument for the assessment of female sexual function. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 26, 191–208.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rosseel, Y. (2012). An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48, 1–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, S. A., Graham, C. A., & Milhausen, R. R. (2008). Predicting sexual problems in women: The relevance of sexual excitation and sexual inhibition. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 37, 241–251.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Strobel, A., Beauducel, A., Debener, S., & Brocke, B. (2001). Eine deutschsprachige Version des BIS/BAS-Fragebogens von Carver und White [A German version of the BIS/BAS questionnaire by Carver and White]. Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie, 22, 216–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turchik, J. A., Garske, J. P., Probst, D. R., & Irvin, C. R. (2010). Personality, sexuality, and substance use as predictors of sexual risk taking in college students. Journal of Sex Research, 47, 411–419.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wiederman, M. W. (1999). Volunteer bias in sexuality research using college student participants. Journal of Sex Research, 36, 59–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiegel, M., Meston, C., & Rosen, R. (2005). The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI): Cross-validation and development of clinical cutoff scores. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 31, 1–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, J. R., Milhausen, R. R., Sales, J. M., Graham, C. A., Sanders, S. A., DiClemente, R. J., & Wingood, G. M. (2013). Arousability as a predictor of sexual risk behaviours in African-American adolescent women. Sexual Health, 10, 160–165.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Julia Velten.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Velten, J., Scholten, S., Graham, C.A. et al. Psychometric Properties of the Sexual Excitation/Sexual Inhibition Inventory for Women in a German Sample. Arch Sex Behav 45, 303–314 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-015-0547-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-015-0547-8

Keywords

Navigation