Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Artificial intelligence outperforms experienced nephrologists to assess dry weight in pediatric patients on chronic hemodialysis

  • Brief Report
  • Published:
Pediatric Nephrology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Dry weight is the lowest weight patients on hemodialysis can tolerate; correct dry weight estimation is necessary to minimize morbi-mortality, but is difficult to achieve. Here, we used artificial intelligence to improve the accuracy of dry weight assessment in hemodialysis patients.

Methods/Results

We designed a neural network which used bio-impedancemetry, blood volume monitoring, and blood pressure values as inputs; output was artificial intelligence dry weight. Fourteen pediatric patients were switched from nephrologist to artificial intelligence dry weight. Artificial intelligence dry weight was higher (28.6%), lower (50%), or identical to nephrologist dry weight. Mean difference between artificial intelligence and nephrologist dry weights was 0.497 kg (− 1.33 to + 1.29 kg). In patients for whom artificial intelligence dry weight was lower than nephrologist dry weight, systolic blood pressure significantly decreased after dry weight decrease to artificial intelligence dry weight (77th to 60th percentile, p = 0.022); anti-hypertensive treatments were successfully decreased or discontinued in 28.7% of cases. In patients for whom artificial intelligence dry weight was higher than nephrologist dry weight, no hypertension was observed after dry weight increase to artificial intelligence dry weight; when present, symptoms of dry weight underestimation receded.

Conclusions

Neural network predictions outperformed those of experienced nephrologists in most cases, proving artificial intelligence is a powerful tool for predicting dry weight in hemodialysis patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Neu AM, Frankenfield DL (2009) Clinical outcomes in pediatric hemodialysis patients in the USA: lessons from CMS’ ESRD CPM project. Pediatr Nephrol 24:1287–1295. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00467-008-0831-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Chavers BM, Solid CA, Daniels FX, Chen SC, Collins AJ, Frankenfield DL, Herzog CA (2009) Hypertension in pediatric long-term hemodialysis patients in the United States. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 4:1363–1369. https://doi.org/10.2215/CJN.01440209

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Peng W, Li Z, Xu H, Xia C, Guo Y, Zhang J, Liu K, Li Y, Pu J, Zhang H, Cui T (2018) Assessment of right ventricular dysfunction in end-stage renal disease patients on maintenance haemodialysis by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. Eur J Radiol 102:89–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2018.02.036

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Fischbach M, Zaloszyc A, Shroff R (2015) The interdialytic weight gain: a simple marker of left ventricular hypertrophy in children on chronic haemodialysis. Pediatr Nephrol 30:859–863. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00467-015-3086-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Gotta V, Marsenic O, Pfister M (2018) Age- and weight-based differences in haemodialysis prescription and delivery in children, adolescents and young adults. Nephrol Dial Transplant. https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfy067

  6. Raimann J, Liu L, Tyagi S, Levin NW, Kotanko P (2008) A fresh look at dry weight. Hemodial Int 12:395–405. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1542-4758.2008.00302.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Heerspink HJL, Ninomiya T, Zoungas S, de Zeeuw D, Grobbee DE, Jardine MJ, Gallagher M, Roberts MA, Cass A, Neal B, Perkovic V (2009) Effect of lowering blood pressure on cardiovascular events and mortality in patients on dialysis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Lancet 373:1009–1015. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60212-9

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Sands JJ, Usvyat LA, Sullivan T, Segal JH, Zabetakis P, Kotanko P, Maddux FW, Diaz-Buxo JA (2014) Intradialytic hypotension: frequency, sources of variation and correlation with clinical outcome. Hemodial Int 18:415–422. https://doi.org/10.1111/hdi.12138

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Paglialonga F, Consolo S, Edefonti A, Montini G (2018) Blood pressure management in children on dialysis. Pediatr Nephrol 33:239–250. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00467-017-3666-8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Allinovi M, Saleem MA, Burgess O, Armstrong C, Hayes W (2016) Finding covert fluid: methods for detecting volume overload in children on dialysis. Pediatr Nephrol 31:2327–2335. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00467-016-3431-4

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Torterüe X, Dehoux L, Macher MA, Niel O, Kwon T, Deschênes G, Hogan J (2017) Fluid status evaluation by inferior vena cava diameter and bioimpedance spectroscopy in pediatric chronic hemodialysis. BMC Nephrol 18:373. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12882-017-0793-1

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Wong Vega M, Srivaths PR (2017) Air displacement plethysmography versus bioelectrical impedance to determine body composition in pediatric hemodialysis patients. J Ren Nutr 27:439–444. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jrn.2017.04.007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Srisuwan K, Hongsawong N, Lumpaopong A, Thirakhupt P, Chulamokha Y (2015) Blood volume monitoring to assess dry weight in pediatric chronic hemodialysis patients. J Med Assoc Thail 98:1089–1096

    Google Scholar 

  14. Nielsen MA (2015) Neural Networks. Neural Networks and Deep Learning, Determination Press

  15. Gil Y, Greaves M, Hendler J, Hirsh H (2014) Artificial intelligence. Amplify scientific discovery with artificial intelligence. Science 346:171–172. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1259439

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the nurses at Robert Debré Pediatric Nephrology Department for their help in assessing dialysis parameters during this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Olivier Niel.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(DOCX 70 kb)

ESM 2

(DOCX 20 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Niel, O., Bastard, P., Boussard, C. et al. Artificial intelligence outperforms experienced nephrologists to assess dry weight in pediatric patients on chronic hemodialysis. Pediatr Nephrol 33, 1799–1803 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00467-018-4015-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00467-018-4015-2

Keywords

Navigation