Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Intraocular pressure measured by dynamic contour tonometer and ocular response analyzer in normal tension glaucoma

  • Letter to the Editor
  • Published:
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Wu LL, Suzuki Y, Ideta R et al (2000) Central corneal thickness of normal tension glaucoma patients in Japan. Jpn J Ophthalmol 44:643–647

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Iwase A, Suzuki Y, Araie M et al (2004) The prevalence of primary open-angle glaucoma in Japanese: the Tajimi Study. Ophthalmology 111:1641–1648

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Shah S, Laiquzzaman M, Mantry S et al (2008) Ocular response analyser to assess hysteresis and corneal resistance factor in low tension, open angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 36:508–513

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ang GS, Bochmann F, Townend J et al (2008) Corneal biomechanical properties in primary open angle glaucoma and normal tension glaucoma. J Glaucoma 17:259–262

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Luce DA (2005) Determining in vivo biomechanical properties of the cornea with an ocular response analyzer. J Cataract Refract Surg 31:156–162

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Shah S, Laiquzzaman M, Cunliffe I et al (2006) The use of the Reichert ocular response analyser to establish the relationship between ocular hysteresis, corneal resistance factor and central corneal thickness in normal eyes. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 29:257–262

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Martinez-de-la-Casa JM, Garcia-Feijoo J, Fernandez-Vidal A et al (2006) Ocular response analyzer versus Goldmann applanation tonometry for intraocular pressure measurements. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 47:4410–4414

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Oncel B, Dinc UA, Gorqun E et al (2009) Diurnal variation of corneal biomechanics and intraocular pressure in normal subjects. Eur J Ophthalmol 19:798–803

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hagishima M, Kamiya K, Fujimura F et al (2009) Effect of corneal astigmatism on intraocular pressure measurement using ocular response analyzer and Goldmann applanation tonometer. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol Sep 29 [Epub ahead of print]

  10. Moreno-Montañés J, Maldonado MJ, García N et al (2008) Reproducibility and clinical relevance of the ocular response analyzer in nonoperated eyes: corneal biomechanical and tonometric implications. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 49:968–974

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tetsuya Morita.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Morita, T., Shoji, N., Kamiya, K. et al. Intraocular pressure measured by dynamic contour tonometer and ocular response analyzer in normal tension glaucoma. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 248, 609–610 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-009-1224-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-009-1224-1

Keywords

Navigation