Skip to main content
Log in

A rational approach to dose reduction in CT: individualized scan protocols

  • Physics
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this study was to demonstrate that dose reduction and constant image quality can be achieved by adjusting X-ray dose to patient size. To establish the relation between patient size, image quality and dose we scanned 19 patients with reduced dose. Image noise was measured. Four radiologists scored image quality subjectively, whereby a higher score meant less image quality. A reference patient diameter was determined for which the dose was just sufficient. Then 22 patients were scanned with the X-ray dose adjusted to their size. Again, image noise was measured and subjective image quality was scored. The dose reduction compared with the standard protocol was calculated. In the first group the measured noise was correlated to the patient diameter (ρ=0.78). This correlation is lost in the second group (ρ=–0.13). The correlation between patient diameter and subjective image quality scores changes from ρ=0.60 (group 1) to ρ=–0.69 (group 2). Compared with the standard protocol, the dose was reduced (mean 28%, range 0–76%) in 19 of 22 patients (86%). Dose reduction and constant noise can be achieved when the X-ray dose is adjusted to the patient diameter. With constant image noise the subjective image quality increases with larger patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Electronic Publication

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wilting, J.E., Zwartkruis, A., van Leeuwen, M.S. et al. A rational approach to dose reduction in CT: individualized scan protocols. Eur Radiol 11, 2627–2632 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/s003300101039

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s003300101039

Navigation