Skip to main content

“New Wars” and Nontraditional Threats

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Encyclopedia of Global Security Studies

Definition

Wars constitute one of the recurrent patterns of social relations. Despite its changing nature, scope, ideologies, tactics, parties, and strategies throughout the history, wars are always considered as a last and probably most effective instrument in resolving the conflicts and realizing the political interests.

Introduction

Indeed, this reality partly explains the reasons why wars are always “out-there” and are not eliminated, albeit all theoretical and political initiatives. When one even looks at the empirical and the analytical studies in the social sciences and, in particular international relations, a few of them are mainly related to the discussion about maintaining stable peace within the international arena (Sheehan 2014; Holsti 2004).

Many studies argue that a possible and enduring peace is the result of wars as reflected in a well-known Latin adage: si vis pacem, para bellum (if you want peace, get ready for the war). In other words, while war is considered as an...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Deacon, R. (2003). Clausewitz and Foucault: War and power. Scientia Militaria: South African Journal of Military Studies, 31(1), 37–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, C. S. (2013). War, peace, and international relations: An introduction to strategic history. London/New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Holsti, K. J. (2004). The state, war, and the state of war, no. 51. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaldor, M. (2005). Old wars, cold wars, new wars, and the war on terror. International Politics, 42(4), 491–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karaosmanoğlu, A. L. (2011). Yirmi birinci yüzyılda savaşı tartışmak: Clausewitz yeniden. Uluslararası İlişkiler Dergisi, 8(29), 5–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koçer, G. (2007). Savaş ve Barış: Temel Seçenekler. In Z. Dağı (Ed.), Uluslararası Politikayı Anlamak Ulus-Devlet’ten Küreselleşmeye (pp. 78–124). Istanbul: Alfa Yayınları.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy, J. S. (2002). War and peace. In W. Carlsnaes et al. (Eds.), Handbook of international relations (pp. 453–476). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lind, W. S., et al. (1989). The changing face of war: Into the fourth generation. Marine Corps Gazette, 48, 22–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mansbach, R. W., & Taylor, K. L. (2012). Introduction to global politics (p. 2012). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulaj, K. (Ed.). (2010). Violent non-state actors in world politics. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, E. (2004). The “new wars” debate: A historical perspective is needed. Security Dialogue, 35(2), 173–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parashar, S. (2013). What wars and “war bodies” know about international relations. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 26(4), 615–630.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheehan, M. (2014). The changing character of war. In J. Baylis, S. Smith, & P. Owens (Eds.), The globalization of world politics: An introduction to international relations (pp. 216–227). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sylvester, C. (2013). Experiencing war: A challenge for international relations. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 26(4), 669–674.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tilly, C. (1985). War-making and state-making as organized crime. In P. B. Evans, D. Rueschemeyer, & T. Scocpol (Eds.), Bringing the state back (pp. 102–120). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waltz, K. N. (1988). The origins of war in neorealist theory. The Journal of Interdisciplinary History, 18(4), 615–628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Further Reading

  • Francis, D. (2004). Rethinking war and peace. London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilpin, R. (1981). War and change in world politics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Levy, J. S., & Thompson, W. R. (2011). Causes of war. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mingst, K. A., McKibben, H. E., & Arreguin-Toft, I. M. (2018). Essentials of international relations. New York: W. W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mumford, A. (2013). Proxy warfare and the future of conflict. The RUSI Journal, 158(2), 40–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reid, J. (2003). Foucault on Clausewitz: Conceptualizing the relationship between war and power. Alternatives, 28(1), 1–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sjoberg, L. (2011). Gender, the state, and war redux: Feminist international relations across the “levels of analysis”. International Relations, 25(1), 108–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mustafa Yetim .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Yetim, M., Kasikci, T. (2020). “New Wars” and Nontraditional Threats. In: Romaniuk, S., Thapa, M., Marton, P. (eds) The Palgrave Encyclopedia of Global Security Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74336-3_567-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74336-3_567-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-74336-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-74336-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Political Science and International StudiesReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics