Skip to main content

Social Stratification

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Global Handbook of Inequality
  • 66 Accesses

Abstract

Social stratification is one of the important subfields in Sociology, a discipline that is concerned with inequalities and structures of power relations. It examines the division of people into layers or strata based on socio-economic factors. The layering of rocks is an intrinsic feature of the geological world, and sociologists posited that the layering of people is an inevitable feature of the social world. In the middle of the twentieth century, sociologists in the United States took on the mantle of sociological research and consciously decided to move the intellectual centre from European society to American society. It was also the period of rebuilding the economy with capitalist enterprises and strengthening democracy. The Social Darwinian and Durkheimian model of the idea of the survival of the fittest led to seeing inequality not in Marxist terms of exploitation but in structural functionalist terms of seeing differences in people and hierarchies in society as inevitable.

In this chapter, we will examine the emergence of the field of social stratification and talk about forms of stratification such as class, race and gender. We will be drawing on examples from different parts of the world but the major focus will be the United States as that is where stratification and social mobility studies thrived. This chapter will be a window to the subject of social stratification in society. The study of social stratification takes for granted that the principle of inequality is inevitable and a normal aspect of society. Girls, racial minorities and the poor are socialised to believe that they will have access to fewer resources than the dominant and the powerful gender, classes and races.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Acker, J. (2006). Class questions: Feminist answers. Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bashi, V., & Mcdaniel, A. (1997). A theory of immigration and racial stratification. Journal of Black Studies, 27(5), 668–682.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beller, E., & Hout, M. (2006). Intergenerational social mobility: The United States in comparative perspective. The Future of Children, 16(2), 19–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blau, P. M., & Duncan, O. D. (1967). The American occupational structure. Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bottomore, T. (1955). Classes in modern society. Ampersand Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook for theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). Greenwood.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crenshaw, K. (2017). On intersectionality: Essential readings. New Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cullen, J., & Novick, S. M. (1979). The Davis-Moore theory of stratification: A further examination and extension. American Journal of Sociology, 84, 1424–1437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Custers, P. (1997). Capital accumulation and women’s labour in Asian Economies. Vistaar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahrendorf, R. (1959). Class and class conflict in industrial society. Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, K., & Moore, W. E. (1970 [1945]). Some principles of stratification. American Sociological Review, 10(2), 242–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1991). Introduction to sociology. Norton Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gopal, M. (2012). Caste, sexuality and labour: The troubled connection. Current Sociology, 60(2), 222–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grenfell, M. J. (2008). Pierre Bourdieu: Key concepts. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, D. (1991). Social stratification. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, B. C., & Miller, R. L. (1993). The silenced voice: Female social mobility patterns with particular reference to the British Isles. The British Journal of Sociology, 44(4), 653–672.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill Collins, P. (1997). Defining black feminist thought. In L. Nicholson (Ed.), The second wave: A reader in feminist theory (pp. 241–260). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jencks, C., et al. (1972). Inequality: A reassessment of the effects of family and School in America. Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jodhka, S. S., & Prakash, A. (2016). The Indian middle class. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerbo, H. R. (2009). Social stratification and inequality. McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, O. (1959). Five families: Mexican case studies in the culture of poverty. Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massey, D. S. (2004). The new geography of inequality in Urban America. In C. Michael Henry (Ed.), Race, poverty, and domestic policy. Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menon, N. (2012). Seeing like a feminist. Zubaan and Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mies, M. (1982). Lace makers of Narsapur: Indian housewives produce for the world market. Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, C. W. (1956). The power elite. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moynihan, D. P. (Ed.). (1969). On understanding poverty: Perspectives from the social sciences. Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, T. (1959). The social structure of the family. In R. N. Anshen (Ed.), The family: Its functions and Destiny. Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patel, R. (2010). Working the night shift: Women in India’s call centre industry. Stanford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pateman, C. (1988). The sexual contract. Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rueschemeyer, D. (1982). On Durkheim’s explanation of division of labor. American Journal of Sociology, 88(3), 579–589.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, W. (1971). Blaming the victim. Pantheon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, J. (2005). Reading the catsuit: Serena Williams and the production of blackness at the 2002 U.S. Open. Journal of Sport & Social Issues 29, 338–357. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193723505276230

  • Stolzman, J., & Gamberg, H. (1973). Marxist class analysis versus stratification analysis as general approaches to social inequality. Berkeley Journal of Sociology, 18, 105–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tumin, M. M. (1953). Some principles of stratification: A critical analysis. American Sociological Review, 18, 387–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vohra, P. (2006). Q2P A documentary film.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (1946). From Max Weber (Trans. and Ed. H. Gerth and C. Wright Mills). Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, W. J. (1980). The declining significance of race: Blacks and changing American institutions. University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, E. O. (1978). Class, crisis and the state. New Left Books.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aparna Rayaprol .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Rayaprol, A. (2023). Social Stratification. In: Jodhka, S.S., Rehbein, B. (eds) Global Handbook of Inequality. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-97417-6_105-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-97417-6_105-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-97417-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-97417-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Social SciencesReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics