Skip to main content
  • 204 Accesses

Abstract

There is no consensus among historians on the subject of feudal law, and the notion of “feudalism” is contested. The traditional approaches, the broader one treating feudal society, the narrower focussing on the contract between lord and vassal, have been questioned as being constructs of modern historians. The Libri feudorum was the main text of medieval feudal law and was the subject of ius commune jurisprudence. The core notion in feudal relations was the bond of fidelity or fealty. Feudal bonds limited the ruler. They were found in a range of relationships in secular and ecclesiastical society. Both the parties benefited in a feudal relationship. With the development of forms of state from the twelfth century, the feudal aspect of rulership was by no means purely personal. Feudal notions persisted beyond the Middle Ages. Feudal custom was perceived as part of natural law.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

Primary Sources

  • (1892) Consuetudines feudorum, ed. Lehmann K, rev. Eckhardt KA. Libraria Dieterichiana, Göttingen (repr. Aalen, 1971)

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldus de Ubaldis (1495) Super usibus feudorum interpretatio, Pavia

    Google Scholar 

Secondary Sources

  • Monographs

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloch M (1961) Feudal society, trans. Manyon MA, with a foreword by Postan MM. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Canning J (1987) The political thought of Baldus de Ubaldis. Cambridge studies in medieval life and thought, 4th series, vol 6. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Cortese E (1995) Il diritto nella storia medievale, vol 2. Il cigno Galileo Galilei, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Danusso C (1991) Ricerche sulla ‘Lectura feudorum’ di Baldo degli Ubaldi. Giuffrè, Milan

    Google Scholar 

  • Ganshof FL (1952) Feudalism, trans. Grierson P, with a foreword by Sir Stenton FM. Longmans, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Giordanengo G (1988) Le droit féodale dans les pays de droit écrit. L’Exemple de la Provence et du Dauphiné XIIe-début XIVe siècle. Bibliothèques des Ecoles Françaises d’Athènes et de Rome, Fascicule 266. Ecole Française de Rome, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds S (1994) Fiefs and vassals. The medieval evidence reinterpreted. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Ullmann W (1967) The individual and society in the middle ages. Methuen, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Vallone G (1999) Isituzioni feudali dell’Italia meridionale: Tra medioevo ed antico regime: L’area salentina. Viella, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Collection

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan M (1998) The oath of fealty and the lawyers. In: Canning J, Oexle OG (eds) Political thought and the realities of power in the Middle Ages/Politisches Denken und die Wirklichkeit der Macht im Mittelalter. Veröffentlichungen des Max-Planck-Instituts für Geschichte. Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, Göttingen, 147. pp 211–228

    Google Scholar 

  • Journal Articles

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown EAR (1974) The tyranny of a construct: feudalism and historians of medieval Europe. Am Hist Rev 79:1063–1088

    Google Scholar 

  • Pennington K (2004) The formation of the jurisprudence of the feudal oath of fealty. Rivista Internazionale di Diritto Commune 15:57–76

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this entry

Cite this entry

Canning, J. (2011). Feudal Law. In: Lagerlund, H. (eds) Encyclopedia of Medieval Philosophy. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9729-4_167

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9729-4_167

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-9728-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-9729-4

  • eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and Law

Publish with us

Policies and ethics