Skip to main content
  • 321 Accesses

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In review of the related empowerment literature, the author finds that many scholars actually use the term “job strain” or “job stress” to describe the psychological strain of employees in the organization. In order to maintain and avoid the term confusion, the author does not employ the original terms and uses the term “role strain” in this study.

References

  • Abramson, L. Y., Metalsky, G. I., & Alloy, L. B. (1989). Hopelessness depression: A theory-based subtype of depression. Psychological Review, 96(2), 358–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Appelbaum, S. H., & Honeggar, K. (1998). Empowerment: A contrasting overview of organizations in general and nursing in particular—An examination of organizational factors, managerial behaviors, job design, and structural power. Empowerment in Organizations, 6(2), 29–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashforth, B. E. (1989). The experience of powerlessness in organizations. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 43, 207–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baguley, K. (1999). Workplace empowerment, job strain and affective organizational commitment in critical care nurses: Testing Kanter’s structural theory of organizational behaviour. Master’s thesis. London: University of Western Ontario.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social-cognitive view. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1990). Perceived self-efficacy in the exercise of personal agency. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 2, 128–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, P. E., & Moen, P. (1999). Scaling back: Dual-earner couples’ work-family strategies. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 61, 995–1007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, N., & Staw, B. (1989). People as sculptors versus sculpture: The roles of personality and personal control in organizations. In J. Ott (Ed.), Classic readings in organizational behavior (pp. 365–378). Florida: Harcourt Brace & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biddle, B. J. (1979). Role theory: Expectations, identities, and behaviors. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Block, P. (1987). The empowered manager: Positive political skills at work. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brief, A. P., & Nord, W. R. (Eds.). (1990). Meaning of occupational work: A collection of essays. Lexington: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. M., & Campbell, E. A. (1990). Sources of occupational stress in the police. Work and Stress, 4, 305–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. M., & Kanter, R. (1982). Empowerment: Key to effectiveness. Hospital Forum, 25(3), 6–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burr, W. R., Hill, R., Nye, F. I., & Reiss, I. L. (Eds.). (1979). Contemporary theories about the Family. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byham, W. C. (1988). Zapp! The lightning of empowerment. New York: Harmony Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conger, J., & Kanungo, R. (1988). The empowerment process: Integrating theory and practice. Academy of Management Review, 13(3), 471–482.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and the “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E. L., Connell, J. P., & Ryan, R. M. (1989). Self-determination in a work organization. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 580–590.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DiTecco, D., Cwitco, G., Arsenault, A., & Andre, M. (1992). Operator stress and monitoring practices. Applied Ergonomics, 23, 29–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evan, W. (1962). Role strain and the norm of reciprocity in research organizations. The American Journal of Sociology, 68, 346–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ford, R. C., & Fottler, M. D. (1995). Empowerment: A matter of degree. The Academy of Management Executive, 9, 21–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankenhaeuser, M., & Gardell, B. (1976). Underload and overload in working life: Outline of a multidisciplinary approach. Journal of Human Stress, 2(3), 35–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • French, J. R. P., & Kahn, R. L. (1962). A programmatic approach to studying the industrial environment and mental health. Journal of Social Issues, 18, 1–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gecas, V. (1989). The social psychology of self-efficacy. Annual Review of Sociology, 15, 291–316 (In W. R. Scott & J. Blake (Eds.)).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gist, M. E., & Mitchell, T. R. (1992). Self-efficacy: A theoretical analysis of its determinants and malleability. Academy of Management Review, 17(2), 183–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goode, W. J. (1960). A theory of role strain. American Sociological Review, 25, 483–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, J. (1994). American know how to be productive if managers will let them. Organizational Dynamics, 22(3), 33–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardy, M. E., & Conway, M. E. (1988). Role theory: Perspectives for health professionals (2nd ed.). Norwalk: Appleton & Lange.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, J. (2001). Occupational therapy in community mental health teams: A continuing dilemma? Role theory offers an explanation. British journal of Occupational Therapy, 64(1), 3440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, S. (1994). Structural power and experienced job satisfaction: The empowerment paradox for women. Sex Roles, 30, 347–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahn, R. L., Wolfe, D. M., Quinn, R. P., Snoek, J. S., & Rosenthal, R. A. (1964). Organizational stress: Studies in role conflict and ambiguity. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanter, R. M. (1977). Men and women of the corporation. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanter, R. M. (1979). Power failure in management circuits. In J. M. Shafritze, J. S. Ott, & Y. S. Jang (Eds.), Classics of organization theory (6th ed., pp. 342–351). Belmont: Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanter, R. M. (1993). Men and women of the corporation (2nd ed.). New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, H. B. (1983). Psychosocial stress: Trends in theory and research. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Komarovsky, M. (1976). Dilemmas of masculinity: A study of college youth. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laschinger, H. K. (1996). A theoretical approach to studying work empowerment in nursing: A review of studies testing Kanter’s theory of structural power in organizations. Nursing Administration Quarterly, 20, 25–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laschinger, H. K. S., & Havens, D. S. (1996). Staff nurse work empowerment and perceived control over nursing practice: Conditions for work effectiveness. Journal of Nursing Administration, 26(9), 27–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laschinger, H. K., Finegan, J., & Shamian, J. (2001a). The impact of workplace empowerment and organizational trust on staff nurses’ work satisfaction and organizational commitment. Health Care Management Review, 23, 7–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laschinger, H. K., Finegan, J., Shamian, J., & Wilk, P. (2001b). Impact of structural and psychological empowerment on job strain in nursing work settings: Expanding Kanter’s model. Journal of Nursing Administration, 31(5), 260–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laschinger, H., Wong, C., McMahon, C., & Kaufmann, C. (1999). Leader behaviour impact on staff nurse empowerment, job tension and work effectiveness. Journal of Nursing Administration, 29(5), 28–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazarus, R. S., Averill, J. R., & Opton, E. M., Jr. (1974). The psychology of coping: Issues of research and assessment. In G. V. Coelho, D. A. Hamburg, & J. E. Adams (Eds.), Coping and adaptation (pp. 249–315). New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lightfoot, S. (1986). On goodness of schools: Themes of empowerment. Peabody Journal of Education, 63(3), 9–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maneson, M., & Ivancevich, J. (1987). Controlling work strain: Effective human resource management strategies. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marks, S. R. (1977). Multiple roles and role strain: Some notes on human energy, time and commitment. American Sociological Review, 42(l), 921–936.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinko, M. J., & Gardner, W. L. (1982). Learned helplessness: An alternative explanation for performance deficits. Academy of Management Review, 7, 195–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maslach, C., & Leiter, M. P. (2008). Early predictors of job burnout and engagement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 498–512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGrath, J. E. (1976). Stress and behavior in organizations. In M. Dunnette (Ed.), The handbook of industrial and organizational psychology. Chicago: Rand McNally College Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nippert-Eng, C. E. (1996). Home and work: Negotiating boundaries through everyday life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Paden, S., & Buehler, C. (1995). Coping with the dual-income lifestyle. Journal of Marriage & Family, 57(1), 101–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearlin, L. I., & Schooler, C. (1978). The structure of coping. Journal of Health & Social Behavior, 18, 2–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reiter, M. S. (1999). Empowerment policing. FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin, 68, 7–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ripley, R. E., & Ripley, M. J. (1992). Empowerment, the cornerstone of quality: Empowering management in innovative organisations in the 1990’s. Management Decision, 30(4), 20–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarbin, T., & Allen, V. L. (1968). Role theory. In G. Lindsey & E. Aronson (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (2nd ed., pp. 488–568). Reading: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sper, E., & Hyer, L. (1994). Stress management in the care of PTSD. In L. Hyer (Ed.), Trauma victim: Theoretical issues and practical suggestions (pp. 587–632). Indiana: Accelerated Development Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spreitzer, G. M. (1995a). Individual empowerment in the workplace: Dimensions, measurement, and validation. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 1442–1465.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spreitzer, G. M. (1995b). A model of intrapersonal empowerment in the workplace. American Journal of Community Psychology, 23(5), 601–629.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spreitzer, G. M. (1996). Social structural levers for workplace empowerment. Academy of Management Journal, 39(2), 483–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spreitzer, G. H. (1997). Toward a common ground in defining empowerment. Research in Organizational Change and Development, 10, 31–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spreitzer, G. M., Kizilos, M. A., & Nason, S. W. (1997). A dimensional analysis of the relationship between psychological empowerment and effectiveness, satisfaction, and strain. Journal of Management, 23(5), 679–704.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, D. J. (2003). Applied community policing in the 21st century (1st ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutton, R., & Kahn, R. (1987). Prediction, understanding, and control. In Handbook of Organizational Behavior (pp. 272–285).

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, K., & Velthouse, B. (1990). Cognitive elements of empowerment: An ‘interpretive’ model of intrinsic task motivation. Academy of Management Review, 15, 666–681.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, K. W., & Tymon, W. G., Jr. (1994). Does empowerment always work: Understanding the role of intrinsic motivation and personal interpretation. Journal of Management Systems, 6, 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wall, T. D., Cordery, J. L., & Clegg, C. W. (2002). Empowerment, performance and operational uncertainty: A theoretical integration. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 51, 146–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward, C. R. (1986). The meaning of role strain. Advances in Nursing Science, 8(2), 39–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, R. (1974). Coping and adaptation. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, B., & Laschinger, H. K. S. (1994). Staff nurse perception of job empowerment and organizational commitment. Journal of Nursing Administration, 24(suppl. 4), 39–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winegar, S. (2003). Motivation in the workplace: An examination of psychological empowerment of police officers in Oregon. Unpublished Dissertation, PSU, Portland. C. Tracy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wuestewald, T., & Steinheider, B. (2006). Shared leadership: Can empowerment work in police organizations? The Police Chief, 73, 48–55.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiaohai Wang .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wang, X. (2015). Theoretical Framework. In: Empowerment on Chinese Police Force's Role in Social Service. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-45614-9_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics