Skip to main content

Conclusion: “‘Geography’ versus Institutions”?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Neo-Environmental Determinism

Abstract

One critique of neo-determinism, which emphasizes the role of social institutions over what it mislabels “geography,” errs on the opposite side by disregarding the important role often—though not independently—played by the environment. Both the “institutions” and the “geography” approaches seek an exogenous variable that can be treated as a first cause and fail to find it, because environment and society, as geographers would stress, are interdependent and co-evolving.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Indeed, the philosopher Barry Smith and the geographer (Smith and Mark 2003) have asked “Do Mountains Exist?,” and answered in the negative. Mountains, they concluded, are not natural kinds that exist independently of human cognition (and thus of human goals, capacities, and purposes). The argument clearly applies by extension to such prominent variables in environmental determinism as other terrain features and varieties of weather and climate.

References

  • Acemoglu, Daron, and James A. Robinson, 2012, Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity, and Poverty (New York: Crown Business).

    Google Scholar 

  • Economist, The, 2011, “Internal Affairs,” 398(8724), 12 March, 83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fogel, Robert William, 1989, Without Consent or Contract: The Rise and Fall of American Slavery (New York: W.W. Norton).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallup, John Luke, Alejandro Gaviria, and Eduardo Loria, 2003, Is Geography Destiny? Lessons from Latin America (Palo Alto, CA: Stanford Social Sciences and the World Bank).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, David, 2009, Cosmopolitanism and the Geographies of Freedom (New York: Columbia University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • McGuire, Robert A., and Philip R.P. Coelho, 2011, Parasites, Pathogens, and Progress: Diseases and Economic Development (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Robbins, Paul, 2003, “Networks and Knowledge Systems: An Alternative to ‘Race or Place,” Antipode 35(4), 818–822.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sluyter, Andrew, 2003, “Neo-Environmental Determinism, Intellectual Damage Control, and Nature/Society Science,” Antipode 35(4), 813–817.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Barry, and David M. Mark, 2003, “Do Mountains Exist? Towards an Ontology of Landforms,” Environment and Planning B 30(3), 411–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Meyer, W.B., Guss, D.M. (2017). Conclusion: “‘Geography’ versus Institutions”?. In: Neo-Environmental Determinism. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54232-4_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54232-4_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-54231-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-54232-4

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics