Abstract
The field of program evaluation is expanding rapidly as has the culture of accountability and data-driven decision-making. Accordingly, the need for demonstrating quality outcomes for community psychiatry and public mental health programs is more important than ever. The mechanics of program evaluation can be daunting and will become moreso as the field of program evaluation expands with more nuanced methodologies and recommendations. In fact, the growth is so significant that, to fully review the wealth of available literature, theory, and texts would be nearly impossible. This chapter aims to provide a summative review with the intention that all professionals who are involved in community mental health will be able to engage with the material and benefit from the discussion. This includes some discussion of basic theory and key components of program evaluation, common types of program evaluation, specific considerations for community mental health, and recommendations concerning sources of data and data analysis choices.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Aby, M. A. (2020). Case study of implementing grant-funded integrated care in a community mental health center. Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research, 47, 293–308. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11414-019-09671-7
Altschuld, J. W., & Watkins, R. (2014). A primer on needs assessment: More than 40 years of research and practice. New Directions for Evaluation, 2014(144), 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.20099
Barnow, B. S. & Greenberg, D. H. (2019). Special issue editors’ essay. Evaluation Review, 43(5), 231–265. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193841X19865076
Brousselle, A., & Champagne, F. (2011). Program theory evaluation: Logic analysis. Evaluation and Program Planning, 34(1), 69–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2010.04.001
Bond, G. R., Evans, L., Salyers, M. P., Williams, J., & Kim, H. W. (2000). Measurement of fidelity in psychiatric rehabilitation. Mental Health Services Research, 2, 75–87.
Cabassa, L. J., Gomes, A. P., & Lewis-Fernández, R. (2015). What would it take? Stakeholders’ views and preferences for implementing a health care manager program in community mental health clinics under health care reform. Medical Care Research and Review: MCRR, 72(1) 71–95. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077558714563171
Coryn, C. L. S., Noakes, L. A., Westine, C. D., & Schrӧter, D. C. (2011). A systematic review of theory-driven evaluation practice from 1990 to 2009. American Journal of Evaluation, 32(2), 199–226. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214010389321
Donabedian, A. (2005). Evaluating the quality of medical care. 1966. The Milbank Quarterly, 83(4), 691–729. (Original work published 1966). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0009.2005.00397.x
Fihn, S. D., Francis, J., Clancy, C., Nielson, C., Nelson, K., Rumsfeld, J., Cullen, T., Bates, J., & Graham, G. L. (2014). Insights from advanced analytics at the Veterans Health Administration. Health Affairs, 33(7), 1203–1211. doi: https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2014.0054
Fiscella, K., & Sanders, M.R. (2016). Racial and Ethnic Disparities in the Quality of Health Care. Annual Review of Public Health, 37(1), 375–394. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-032315-021439
Fortuna, L. R., Tolou-Shams, M., Robles-Ramamurthy, B., & Porche, M. V. (2020). Inequity and the disproportionate impact of COVID-19 on communities of color in the United States: The need for a trauma-informed social justice response. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30164-X
Ganju, V. (2006). Mental health quality and accountability: the role of evidence-based practices and performance measurement. Administration and Policy in Mental Health, 33(6), 659–665.
Gao, X., Shen, J., Wu, H., & Kreen, H. Y. (2019). Evaluating program effects: Conceptualizing and demonstrating a typology. Evaluation and Program Planning, 72, 88–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2018.10.008
Gertler, P. J., Martinez, S., Premand, P., Rawlings, L. B., & Vermeersch, C. M. (2016). Impact evaluation in practice. The World Bank.
Gill, S., Kuwahara, R., & Wilce, M. (2016). Through a culturally competent lens: Why the program evaluation standards matter,. Health Promot Pract., 17(1), 5–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524839915616364
Gowin, D., & Millman, J. (1981). Toward reform of program evaluation. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 3(6),85–87.
Hermann, R. C., Chan, J. A., Provost, S. E., & Chiu, W. T. (2006a). Statistical benchmarks for process measures of quality of care for mental and substance use disorders. Psychiatric Services, 57(10), 1461–1467.
Hermann, R. C., Chan, J. A., Zazzali, J. L., & Lerner, D. (2006b). Aligning measurement-based quality improvement with implementation of evidence-based practices. Administration and Policy in Mental Health, 33(6), 636–645.
Hermann, R. C., Mattke, S., Somekh, D., Silfverhielm, H., Goldner, E., Glover, G., et al. (2006c). Quality indicators for international benchmarking of mental health care. International Journal of Quality in Health Care, 18 Suppl 1, 31–38.
Hill, L. G., Maucione, K., & Hood, B. K. (2007). A focused approach to assessing program fidelity. Prevention Science, 8, 25–34.
Jacobson, M. R., & Azzam, T. (2018). The effects of stakeholder involvement on perceptions of an evaluation’s credibility. Evaluation and Program Planning, 68, 64–73. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2018.02.006
Kilbourne, A. M., Beck, K., Spaeth-Rublee, B., Ramanuj, P., O’Brien, R. W., Tomoyasu, N., & Pincus, H. A. (2018). Measuring and improving the quality of mental health care: A global perspective. World Psychiatry, 17(1), 30–38. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20482
Luchins, D. (2012). Two Approaches to Improving Mental Health Care: Positivist/quantitative versus skill-based/qualitative. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 55, 409–34.
McGrew, J. H., Bond, G. R., Dietzen, L., & Salyers, M. (1994). Measuring the fidelity of implementation of a mental health program model. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 62, 670–678.
McHugo, G. J., Drake, R. E., Teague, G. B., & Xie, H. (1999). Fidelity to assertive community treatment and client outcomes in the New Hampshire dual disorders study. Psychiatric Services, 50, 818–824.
Moore, Q., Perez-Johnson, I., & Santillano, R. (2019). Decomposing differences in impacts on survey- and administrative-measured earnings from a job training voucher experiment. Evaluation Review, 42(5–6), 515–549. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193841X18799434
National Institute of Mental Health. (2011). 2012 Budget report. Retrieved from http://www.nimh.nih.gov/about/budget/cj2012.pdf.
Nesbit, B., Hertz, M., Thigpen, S., Castellanos, T., Brown, M., Porter, J., & Williams, A. (2018). Innovative methods for designing actionable program evaluation. J Public Health Manag Practi., 24(Suppl 1), S12–S22. https://doi.org/10.1097/PHH.0000000000000706
Pincus, H. A., Scholle, S. H., Spaeth-Rublee, B., Hepner, K. A., & Brown, J. (2016). Quality measures for mental health and substance use: Gaps, opportunities, and challenges. Health Affairs, 35(6), 1000–1008. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2016.0027
Rabarison, K. M., Marcelin, R. A., Bish, C. L., Chandra, G., Massoudi, M. S., & Greenlund, K. J. (2018). Cost analysis of Prevention Research Centers: Instrument development. J Public Health Manag Pract., 24(5), 440–443. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/PPH.0000000000000706
Roberts, M. & Steele, R. (2005). Program evaluation approaches to service delivery in child and family mental health. In Handbook of Mental Health Services for Children, Adolescents, and Families. EBSCO Publishing NetLibrary; printed on 2/14/2011 3:32 pm via University of Alabama-Birmingham eISBN:9780306485602.
Rollins, A. L., Kukla, M., Salyers, M. P., McGrew, J. H., Flanagan, M. E., Leslie, D. L., Hunt, M. G., & McGuire, A. B. (2017). Comparing the costs and acceptability of three fidelity assessment methods for Assertive Community Treatment. Adm Policy Ment Health, 44, 810–816. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-016-0785-7
Rushing, S. & Lefkovitz, P. (2008). Learning from top performers. Behav Healthc, 28(2), 28, 30–31.
Schalock, R. L. (1995). Outcome-based evaluation. New York: Plenum Press.
Schalock, R. L. (2001). Outcome-based evaluation, second edition. EBSCO Publishing-NetLibrary; printed on 2/28/2011 3:12pm via University of Alabama-Birmingham eISBN:9780306464584.
Schalock, R. L., Lee, T., Verdugo, M., Swart, K., Claes, C., van Loon, J., & Lee, C. S. (2014). An evidence-based approach to organization evaluation and change in human service organizations evaluation and program planning. Evaluation and program planning, 45, 110–118.
Schalock, R. L., Verdugo, M. A., and Gomez, L. E. (2011). Evidence-based practices in the field of intellectual and developmental disabilities: An international consensus approach. Evaluation and Program Planning, 34(3), 273–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2010.10.004
Schmidt, E. M., Krahn, D. D., McGuire, M. H., Tavakoli, S., Wright, D. M., Solares, H. E., Lemke, S., & Trafton, J. (2017). Using organizational and clinical performance data to increase the value of mental health care. Psychological Services, 14(1), 13–22. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/ser0000098
Schoenwald, S. K., Garland, A. F., Chapman, J. E., Frazier, S. L., Sheidow, A. J., & Southam-Gerow, M. A. (2011). Toward the effective and efficient measurement of implementation fidelity. Administration and Policy in Mental Health, 38(1), 32–43. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-010-0321-0
Shearer, J., McCrone, P., & Romeo, R. (2016). Economic evaluation of mental health interventions: A guide to costing approaches. PharmacoEconomics, 34, 651–664. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40273-016-0390-3
Smith, J. D. & Hasan, M. (2020). Quantitative approaches for the evaluation of implementation research studies. Psychiatry Res., 283, 112521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2019.112521
Teague, G. B., Mueser, K. T., & Rapp, C.A. (2012). Advances in fidelity measurement for mental health services research: four measures. Psychiatr Serv., 63(8), 765–771.
Treasury Board of Canada, Secretariat. (1998). Program Evaluation Methods. Public Affairs Branch.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration on Children, Youth, and Families. (2016). Qualitative research methods in program evaluation: Considerations for federal staff. https://www.acf.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/acyf/qualitative_research_methods_in_program_evaluation.pdf
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (1999). Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report: Framework for program evaluation in public health. https://www.cdc.gov/eval/framework/index.htm
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Office of the Director, Office of Strategy and Innovation. (2011). Introduction to program evaluation for public health programs: A self-study guide. https://www.cdc.gov/eval/guide/index.htm
Weisner, T. S. & Hay, M. C. (2015). Practice to research: Integrating evidence-based practices with culture and context. Transcultural Psychiatry, 52(2), 222–243. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1363461514557066
Wolff, N., Helminiak, T., Morse, G., Calsyn, R., Klinkenberg, D., & Trusty, M. (1997). Cost-effectiveness evaluation of three approaches to case management for homeless mentally ill clients. American Journal of Psychiatry, 154(3), 341–348.
Youker, B. W., Ford, K., & Bayer, N. (2017). Dismissing the goals: A comparison of four goal-dismissive goal-free evaluations. Evaluations and Program Planning, 64, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2017.05.007
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Thomas, A.R., Savage, E.E., Hodgin, K., Savage, R. (2022). Program Evaluation. In: Sowers, W.E., McQuistion, H.L., Ranz, J.M., Feldman, J.M., Runnels, P.S. (eds) Textbook of Community Psychiatry. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-10239-4_52
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-10239-4_52
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-10238-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-10239-4
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)