Skip to main content

Bauxite: Geology, Mineralogy, Resources, Reserves and Beneficiation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Smelter Grade Alumina from Bauxite

Part of the book series: Springer Series in Materials Science ((SSMATERIALS,volume 320))

Abstract

In this chapter the Authors summarize the typical features of bauxite which are believed to play roles in mining, beneficiation and mainly in alumina processing, that is, the industrial value of the raw material. Geological curiosities are neglected. General physio-chemical conditions are outlined in order to understand the ore formation being determinant of the quality (chemistry and mineralogy) and quantity of the bauxite ore. Special emphasise is given to its chemical and mineralogical composition make up and their alterations are shown in selected examples, indicating the possible inhomogeneity of the mine product processed in the refineries. In deposit geology laterite, karst and sedimentary/paralic deposits are distinguished requiring significant differences in mining methods and technology applied in processing. In laterite deposits three main types are introduced namely: (1) plateau type deposits developed on morphological terraces and low land interfluves, (2) whale back plateaus and (3) dome shaped hills confined by hilltops and bauxites on hill tops with associated slope bauxites. For estimating the possible supply furnishing of operating refineries or for establishment of green-field plants an overview is given on global bauxite reserves and resources with their grade and mineralogy, amended with their further potential established with the aid of remote sensing technics introduced by the Author in 2006. Principles of physical bauxite beneficiation of the Run of Mine (ROM) bauxite is presented together with the most common unit operations applied. A flowchart example is shown integrating many of the unit operations. To minimize transportation cost and be able to supply more than one refinery, the beneficiation takes place at the mine site before the beneficiated bauxite is exported to the refinery. Principles of thermo-chemical bauxite beneficiation/activation is presented for three distinctive purposes: (1) Reduce organic carbon in the ROM bauxite before feeding the refinery and thus reducing the organic carbon input to the Bayer process liquor before digestion; (2) Activate the content of boehmite in the ROM bauxite to enable low temperature digestion with the side benefit of significantly reducing the organic carbon in the ROM bauxite, and (3) Pyro-genic attack or sintering of the ROM bauxite with limestone and/or sodium carbonate, when the bauxite is composed of mainly mono hydrate bauxites (boehmite or diaspore) and low to high silica content in order to maximize yield of alumina, recovery of caustic and reduced energy consumption. Only the soda-lime sintering process has gained commercial status over time, and especially in China. All the thermo-chemical bauxite beneficiation/activation processes are planned to be built at the refinery site, and in the case of the soda-lime sintering process integrated with the Bayer process in the overall process flowsheet.

Benny E. Raahauge is deceased.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    It is also qualified as “low mono content” ore (Sangaredi – Guinea).

  2. 2.

    It is also qualified as “high mono content” ore (Sangaredi – Guinea).

References

  1. Bárdossy, G., - Aleva, G.J.J. (1990) Laterite bauxite. - Akad. kiadó Budapest - Hungary

    Google Scholar 

  2. G. Komlóssy, Assessment of the West African Bauxite Deposits. Identified and Potential (Rio Tinto doc. Melbourne, Australia, 2014)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Komlóssy, G. (1985) Paleogeographic implication of karst bauxite genesis - ICSOBA Travaux Vol 14-15 Zagreb Yugoslavia 

    Google Scholar 

  4. Rio Tinto Ltd. Plt. (2008) Bauxite Training, Brazil. - Lecture

    Google Scholar 

  5. J.G. Weisse, Bauxite latéritique et bauxite karstique. (in French Laterite bauxites and karst bauxites), in Symposium Bauxites et hydroxides d’aluminium. – Zagreb – Yugoslavia (1964)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Huashu  Yang (1990) Bauxite deposits of China. - Chinese Journal of Geochemistry. Vol.8. No 4. 

    Google Scholar 

  7. Djokic, V., Kelezic, M.,Voros, I. (1978): New aspects of bauxite geology in Montenegro, Yugoslavia. - 4th Int. Congr. of ICSOBA Vol. I. Athens, Greece

    Google Scholar 

  8. ALUTERV-FKI, Report on the Feasibility Study of the JAVEMEX Alumina Plant (Budapest, Hungary, 1976)

    Google Scholar 

  9. G.Komlóssy, Representative sampling of the Fria—Guinea Deposit (Manuscript, Budapest, Hungary, 2004)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gubbs, D.K., Rodenburg, J.K., Wefers,K.A. (1982) Origin of aluminous goethite in Suriname bauxite - in Bell, G.M. ed. Light Metal Comm. 110th A.I.M.E. Ann. Meeting Feb. 1981 Chicago USA

    Google Scholar 

  11. Komlóssy, G. (1976) Formation of laterite bauxite and iron ore deposit in Goa - India. - Ált. Földt. Szemle (General Geol. Review) Budapest - Hungary 

    Google Scholar 

  12. ALUTERV-FKI (1978) Report on the feasibility of the Kibi (Ghana) bauxite and alumina project Budapest, Hungary

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mamedov, V.I., Anufriev, A.A., Jakubivits, I.K., Suma, N.L.(1985) Particularities of the Sangaredi bauxite, Guinea (in Russian). Vyssh. Utaheb Zavod. Geol. Razvdka, Moskow, No. 4. 

    Google Scholar 

  14. Rao, M.G., Raman, P.K. (1979) The East Coast bauxite deposits of India. - Bull. Sc. Eco. Geol. GSI. Vol. 46.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Patterson, S. (1986) World bauxite resources. - US Geol. Surv. - Washington, US

    Google Scholar 

  16. Panov, A., Suss, A. (2002). World bauxite market scenario and new raw material sources for alumina production. - Travaux ICSOBA. Vol. 29 No 33 Vienna, Austria 

    Google Scholar 

  17. G. Komlóssy, Bauxite Reserves and Resources and Further Prospects at Niksic Bauxite Mine (Montenegro) (Glencor Archive, Baar Switzerland, 1999)

    Google Scholar 

  18. ALUTERV-FKI. (1975). Report on the Geology and Reserves of Bauxite Deposits of Lang Son, Vietnam

    Google Scholar 

  19. Bárdossy, G. (2010) The Szőc bauxite deposit. – Occasional Papers of the Geological Inst. of Hung. – Budapest, Hungary

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ostap, S. (1984) Effect on bauxite mineralogy on its processing characteristics. In Jacob, Jr. El. Ed., Bauxite Proc. , 1984 Bauxite Symposium, Los Angeles USA., AIME., New York, pp 651–671

    Google Scholar 

  21. Komlóssy, G. (1969) The Iszkaszentgyörgy bauxite (SE Bakony Mts, Hungary). Problem of genesis and mineral formation. – Annales Instituti Geologici Publici Hungarici – Vol. LIV. Fasc.3. – Budapest

    Google Scholar 

  22. Bronevoi, V.A., Zhilberminc, and Teniakov, V.A. 1985: Average of chemical composition of bauxites and their evolution in time (in Russian). – Geokhimia, Moscow, 4.

    Google Scholar 

  23. G. Pantó, A ritja földfémek geokémiája és hasznosításuk (in Hungarian), in Geochemistry of the Rare Earth Elements and Their Utilization (Acad. Doctoral Theses. Manuscript. Budapest, Hungary, 1980)

    Google Scholar 

  24. S.Beaulieu, Impurities Control from Mine to Plant. in 35th International ICSOBA Conference, Hamburg, Germany, 2–5 Oct 2017

    Google Scholar 

  25. Chemokomplex – Aluterv (1974): Broullon de rapport definitive sur une érude préliminaire de factibilité sur la conversion locale des bauxites Malgaches (in French Draft report on the feasibility of local processing of bauxites of Madagascar) – Onudi contract 72/53

    Google Scholar 

  26. ALUTERV-FKI, Rapport on the feasibility of bauxite mines and processing alumina refinery at Lang Son, Vietnam – in Frech., - Budapest, Hungary (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  27. G. Bárdossy, Karsztbauxitok. Bauxittelepek karbonátos kőzeteken (in Hungarian) - Karst bauxites. Bauxite deposits on carbonate rocks. – Akad. Kiadó. Budapest – Hungary (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Nandi, A.K. (2004):Bauxite alumina industry of India. – Present status and future prospects. – Travaux of ICSOBA Vol.31 No 35. St. Petersburg,Russia.

    Google Scholar 

  29. K. Nageswararao, Further Developments in the Modelling and Scale-Up of Industrial Hydrocyclones (Ph. D. thesis, The University of Queensland, 1978)

    Google Scholar 

  30. R.Y. Black, G.-P. Lozej, S.S. Maddah (1984) The geology of bauxite deposits of Ghana, in Bauxite Proceedings 1984 Bauxite Symposium Los Angeles USA, ed. by Jacobs Jr. (A.I.M.E., New York)

    Google Scholar 

  31. G. Komlóssy (1976a) Minérealogy, géochemie et génétique des bauxites Vietnam du Nord (in French Mineralogy, geochemistry and genetics of North Vietnamese bauxite). Acta Geol. Acad. kiadó . Sci. Hung. Tom

    Google Scholar 

  32. Bárdossy, G., Csanádi, A., Csordás-Tóth, A. (1978) Scanning electron microscope study of bauxites of different ages and origins. – Clays. Clay Miner No 26 pp. 245–262

    Google Scholar 

  33. ALUSUISSE-CVG (1980) Field work and evaluation of ore reserves.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Ross, Y., Black, R. Y., Lozej, G. P. and Maddah, S. S. (1984), Geology and mineralogy of the Az Zabirah Bauxite, Northern Saudi Arabia, Proceedings of the 1984 Bauxite Symposium, Los Angeles, California, USA

    Google Scholar 

  35. B. Balkay (1973) Bauxitization and underground drainage. Travaux, ICSOBA No. 9.Part B. Pp 151–161. Zagerb, Yugoslavia

    Google Scholar 

  36. Komlóssy, G. (1976b) Formation of lateritic bauxite and iron ore deposits in Goa, India. – Ált. Földt. Szemle. (General Geol. Review). Budapest

    Google Scholar 

  37. E. Dudich, G. Komlóssy (1969) Paleogeographical and structural considerations to the question of the age of the Hungarian bauxite deposits (In Hungarian). Földt. Közl. 99. Budapest. – Hungary

    Google Scholar 

  38. G. Pedro, J. Berrier, Sur altération expérimentale de la kaolinite et sa transformation en boehmite par lessivage a l’eau. (in French) – Experimental alteration of the kaolinite and its transformation to boehmite by dissolution in water. C. R. Acad. Sci Paris 226. Série D, 551–554 (1963)

    Google Scholar 

  39. G. Pedro, A. J. Melfi (1983): The superficial alteration in tropical region and the lateritisation phenomena. – In Melfi, A.J. and Carvalho eds. Proc. “n dint. Seminar on Lateritisation Process, 1982. – Sao Paulo, Brazil

    Google Scholar 

  40. S. M. Belinga (1971) Étude géochemique des eaux de circulation recueillis dans la zone des plateau bauxitiques du sedcteur Haléo: Minim Martap (Adamaoua), Cameroun. Ann. Fac. Sci Cameroun 5. Pp 33-37.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Valeton, I. (1972) Bauxites. – Elsev ier Publ. co. Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  42. K. Jespsen, W. Shellmann (1974): Über den Stoffbestand und die Bildungsbedingungen der bauxite lagerstatte Weipa, Astralien. Geol. Jahrb. Hannover, D.

    Google Scholar 

  43. A. Mindszenty (1978) Tantitive interpretation of the micromorphology of bauxitic laterites. – In Proc. 4th Int. ICSOBA Congress, Athens, Greece

    Google Scholar 

  44. G. Komlóssy (1993a) Worsley Alumina Pty. Ltd. (Australia) – Project Kudu. Final Report. Part Geology. HATCH and Ass. London

    Google Scholar 

  45. G. Taylor, A.R. Eggleton (2004) “The little balls” The origin of the Weipa bauxite. - Roach I.C. ed. 2004. Regolith 2004. CRC LEME

    Google Scholar 

  46. G. Komlóssy, et al., Report on the Reconnaissance Field Visit to Gujarat and Maharastra (Rt doc. Melbourne, Australia, 2012)

    Google Scholar 

  47. G. Bárdosy, The Halimba bauxite deposit. Occasional Paper Geol. Inst. Hungary 2008, 87 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  48. D.V. Sapozhnyikov, Geneticeskaya klassifikacia boksitovih mestorozhgenyja USSR (in Russian)—Genetic classification of Soviet Union’s bauxite occurrences), in Problems of Bauxite Genesis (Ikzd. Nauka, Moscow, 1975)

    Google Scholar 

  49. D.V. Sapozhnyikov, Geneticeskaya klassifikacia boksitovih mestorozhgenyja USSR (in Russian)—Genetic classification of Soviet Union’s bauxite occurrences), (Problemy I genezhisa boksitov, Moscow, 1975)

    Google Scholar 

  50. E. Vadász, Bauxitföldtan (in Hungarian)—Bauxite Geology (Akad. Kiadó Budapest, Hungary, 1951)

    Google Scholar 

  51. J.G. Weisse, Bauxite karstique sur clacaire recent (In French)—Karst Bauxites on Recent Limestones. (Travaux de l’ICSOBA. Zagreb, Yugoslavia, 1976)

    Google Scholar 

  52. V.A. Zans, Recent Views on Origin of Bauxites (Geonotes 1. 5 Kingston—Jamaica, 1959)

    Google Scholar 

  53. G.R. Kirpal, V.A. Teniakov, (1978). The deposits of aluminium (in Russian) – Ore deposits of the USSR Niedra, Moscow

    Google Scholar 

  54. L.C. King,. (1962): Morphology of the Earth. – Oliver and Boyd Publ. House, London UK

    Google Scholar 

  55. ALUTERV-FKI, Rapport sur une etude de factibilité des mines de bauxite et d”une usine d’alumine a Lang Son – Vietnam (in French) Report on the feasibility bauxite mines and processing in alumina refinery at Lang Son, - Vietnam (1977). G.Bárdossy, K.Jónás, A.Imre, K. Solymár, Interrelation of bauxite texture, micromorphology, mineral individualism and heteromorphism. – Econ. Geol. No. 72 (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  56. T.E. Wong, Outline of the stratigraphy and the geological history of Suriname coastal plain. Geol. Mijnbouw 65 (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  57. A.K. Nandi and L. Mueller (2001): The Indian bauxite scenario and prospects for export. – Metal Bulletin No 7. Bauxite and Alumina Seminar, Miami, Florida, USA

    Google Scholar 

  58. Rio Tinto Ltd. Plt.(2008) Bauxite seminar - Brazil 

    Google Scholar 

  59. Kotschoubey, B.L., de Queiros Menezes, Truckenbrodt, W. (1984) Nature et evolution des bauxites de secteur de Jabuti- Ipixuana (District de Paragominas – État du Pará, Brésil. 109e Congr. Nat. Soc. Savantes, Dijon Sciences 1 pp. 335–345

    Google Scholar 

  60. G.Komlóssy (2008), Explanation Notes to SRTM Maps of Indochina Showing Its Bauxite Potential (RT Archive, Melbourne, Australia, 2008)

    Google Scholar 

  61. A.J. Melfi and Carvalho (1983) Bauxitization on alkaline rocks in Southern Brazil. – Sci. Géol. Mém. Strassbourg. France

    Google Scholar 

  62. A.T.C.Veiga, L.A.Vessani, G.A. Guerra, J.L.G. Costa, The Barro Alto bauxite deposit. A large and rich bauxite deposit recently discovered in the Goias State, Central Brazil. ICSOBA Travaux 37(41) (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  63. Hieronymus, B (1985) Étude de l’altération des roches éruptives de l’oues de Cameroun. – Latéritisation, bauxitisation et évolution bauxitique. (in French Study on alteration of eruptive rocks in West Cameroon) These de doctorat d’état Université Pierre et Marie Curie. – Paris – France

    Google Scholar 

  64. V. Carboni (2005): Bauxite potential of Cameroon, West Africa. – AlCAN - Monteral. RT archive Melbourne- Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  65. W. Li, Alumina industry in China, in 19th International Bauxite and Alumina Conference (Miami, US. Metal Bulletin, 2013)

    Google Scholar 

  66. B. Fodor (1994) UN Economic Commnission for Europe: Assessment of mineral resources and reserves under market conditions. – New York/Geneva.

    Google Scholar 

  67. G. Komlóssy (2010) Review on global bauxites, origin and types. Travaux ICSOBA Vol 35.No. 39. Zhengzhou, China.

    Google Scholar 

  68. V.I. Mamedov (2005) Bauxite Provinces in Guinea (2005) in Syposium on Mines Guineé. Ministerium of Mines and Geology.2011 Lecture, Conakry, Guinea

    Google Scholar 

  69. B.A. Bogatirev, V.V. Zhukov (2009) Bauxite provinces of the World. Geology of the Ore Deposits Vol.51 Pleaides Publishing Ltd

    Google Scholar 

  70. I. Valenton, New York: Elsevier Publishing Company (1972)

    Google Scholar 

  71. B. Wills, T. Napier-Munn, Mineral Processing Technology (Elsevier Science & Technology Books, New York, 2006)

    Google Scholar 

  72. I.R. Plitt, A mathematical model of the hydrocyclone classifier. CIM Bull. 114–122 (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  73. C.M. van Deursen, Métodos de desaguamento e disposição de rejeito da bauxita: estudo de caso e avaliação econômica. São Paulo. 2016, 127 p. (Mestrado) Escola Politécnica, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  74. D.J. Milne, The influence of Mineralogy on alumina processing. Chem. Eng. Australia ChE7(2) (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  75. N. Brown, T.J. Cole, The behavior of sodium oxalate in Bayer Alumina Plants. Light Metals 105–118 (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  76. M. Hollitt et al., The Comalco Bauxite activation process, in International Alumina Quality Workshop (2002), pp. 115–122

    Google Scholar 

  77. H.H. Pohland, A.J. Tielens, A new Bayer liquor purification process. Light Metals 211–222 (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  78. A. Rijkeboer, A.P.van der Meer, Bauxite roasting—an option to reduce organics input to Bayer Plant Liquor, in International Alumina Quality Workshop (1993), pp. 254–269

    Google Scholar 

  79. G.J.J. Aleva, Lateritization, bauxitization and the cyclic landscape development in the Guiana Shield, in Bauxite Proceedings 1984 Bauxite Symposium, Los Angeles USA, ed. by L. Jacob Jr. (AIME., New York, 1984)

    Google Scholar 

  80. P. Lecis, A.. Guidi, Pyrogenic attack of bauxite, in Extractive Metallurgy of Aluminum, Vol. 1 (1962), pp. 231–249.

    Google Scholar 

  81. G. Songqing, Chinese Bauxite and Its Influence on Alumina Production in China. Light Metals 44–47 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  82. G.O. Kesse, The geology of bauxite deposits of Ghana, in Bauxite Proceedings of 1984 Bauxite Symposium, Los Angeles USA., ed. by Jacobs Jr. (A.I.M.E., New York) (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  83. G. Komlóssy, Report on the tonnage vs. grade reserve calculation of the BALCO captive bauxites and the Khuria Highland occurrence. Chattisgarh State, India (Manuscript, - BALCO doc. Bhubaneshwar – India Sept. 2002 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  84. G.J.J. Aleva, Laterites. Concepts, Geology, Morphology and Chemistry (ISRIC, Wageningen, The Netherlands, 1994)

    Google Scholar 

  85. G.Komlóssy, P.Siklósi, G.Tóth, Zs. Csillag, Techno Economic Study for the Commercial Extraction of Alumina from Bauxitic Clay. Draft final report (UNIDO, Mexico City, Mexico, 1988)

    Google Scholar 

  86. G. Komlóssy, Report on the East Coast Bauxite Deposits and Their Further Prospects Established by Land Sat Interpretation (RT Archive, Melbourne, Australia, 2006)

    Google Scholar 

  87. G.Komlóssy, J. Heim, Assessment of Guinea’s Bauxite Resources and Potential (RT Archive, Melbourne Australia, 2013)

    Google Scholar 

  88. F.Lelong, Y.Tardy, G.Grandin, J.J.Trescases, B. Boulange, Pedogenesis, Chemical Weathering and Processes of Some Supergene Ore Deposits (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1976) (Reprinted from strata-bound and stratiform ore deposits edited by K.H.Wolf) (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  89. G. Millot, Géologie des argiles. (in French) Geology of Clays (Masson Ed., Paris, 1964)

    Google Scholar 

  90. G. Komlóssy, Representative sampling for elaboration of the alumina manufactoring process (Theory and practice), in Proceedings of ICSOBA XVI International Symposium, Nagpur, India (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  91. G. Komlóssy (1993b) Mineracaoin Rio de Norte S.A. (Brazil). – Project Kudu Final Report, Part Geology. HATCH and Ass. London. 1993

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendices

Appendix: Representative sampling for elaboration of the alumina manufacturing process (Theory and practice)

Generalities

All kinds of geological sampling for analyses need comprehensive geological knowledge about the rock (geological formation) to be sampled. Representative sampling for tests serving the elaboration of technology of processing a raw material is one of the most important tasks of a geologist.

As much as 50–200 kg of representative sample for laboratory tests is needed when an operating refinery needs new feedstock to process. In case of establishing a new refinery, depending on the technology envisaged to be applied 1–10 tons, or even more may be needed when test is carried out on pilot plant scale. To take out hundred kilograms or even tons of bauxite from a deposit consisting of ten-, or even hundred million tons of raw material the geologist must be aware of its local (specific) conditions of genesis, accumulation, chemical and mineralogical make up and their variances both vertical and horizontal directions, secondary alterations, along with the shape and size of the deposits.

Representative samples are composed based on the exploration data. Bulk sample has to involve individual samples of extreme concentrations of each determinant element in proper ratio. How far a carefully taken sample is really representative in practice, that is, how far the chemical and mineralogical composition of the sample and the mine product are uniform (deviations are in acceptable ranges) it highly depends on how reliable the exploration and reserve calculation data are, and how far the mining method fits to the deposit characteristics. Reliability of the representative sample comprises all the errors of the exploration method, techniques, sampling, analyses and reserve calculation. Alumina refinery pays bonus after shipments of ore when better than agreed in contract. Mining company pays penalty after lower quality. Contract between the producer and consumer, among the others, is based on the results of the technological tests carried out on representative sample.

When no adequate data are available additional mineralogical reconnaissance is to be made for setting up a sampling plan taking into account the variances in mineralogical composition of the deposit.

What is Representative Sample?

Representative samples are taken either for:

  1. (a)

    establishing the technology in a new plant, or

  2. (b)

    satisfying the demand of an operating refinery.

In the second case the technology may need to be modified according to the new feedstock.

For satisfying the demand of the representation a composite sample, both in its chemical and mineralogical composition, should be fitted, to that of the run-off mine ore’s characteristics planned to be extracted in a long term. Quality, mineralogy of mine product changes during the mine operation period. For that reason, depending on the measure of expected changes, collecting additional subsamples may also be needed.

From the point of chemical view, the bauxite sample can be regarded as a representative one provided the differences satisfy the following deviation conditions:

  1. i.

    TAl2O3 ± 1.5 abs.%, when TAl2O3 ≥ 45% and ± 1,0 abs. % when TAl2O3 < 45% and,

  2. ii.

    TSiO2 ± 0.5 – 0.8 abs.%, when TSiO2 ≤ 5% and ± abs.%1,0 abs.% when TSiO2 > 1%.

It is better to apply these conditions for available alumina and reactive silica, but no sufficient amount of data are always available for the deposits in this respect.

Conditions for acceptable differences must be clarified with the responsible process engineer before the sample is composed. When the deviations are somewhat looser the sample is regarded as characteristic sample.

In case of laterite bauxites, the difference for Fe2O3 is not so important because there is a very close negative correlation between the TAl2O3% and Fe2O3%. The correlation coefficient (R) is around 0.90–0.95. Therefore, if the bauxite is representative for alumina it must also be representative in its iron oxide content within an acceptable range (± 1–2%). In case of karst bauxites, the correlation between the alumina and iron, in contrary, is a positive one and it is not so tight. The representative sample should be taken by that way that the difference in iron oxide be less than ± 2 abs. %.

The contaminants, like Corg, ΣSO3, MnO2, etc. are related typically to the epigenetic (secondary) processes in karst bauxites. ΣCO2 > 1%, in karst bauxite,  due to a secondary re-accummulation. Corg,  ∑CO2  and P2O5 occur in laterite bauxites. Their variances are extremely high both vertically and horizontally. See details in Sect. 2.2.1.2. These elements are not involved in the routine analyses of the exploration, but there are, in most cases, data enough to estimate them in the deposit average. Based on geostatistical calculation extreme and most frequent values may also be known. Process engineers must be informed about these data and it is also necessary to take them into account when the bulk sample is composed, in case additional subsamples may be needed.

The sample must be representative, or at least characteristic, in its mineralogical make up, as well. Systematic quantitative mineralogical analyses usually are not available. Representative samples are composed based on the available information on mineralogy. If adequate data are not available, additional mineralogy tests are needed to make on individual samples before the bulk samples blended.

Classification of the Bauxites by Their Mineralogical Composition

Based on the fundamental processing properties of the bauxites they are classified into the following main types:

  1. (a)

    Gibbsitic bauxite: at least 95% of its free Al 2 O 3 content, (aluminum oxi-hydroxides) must be in gibbsite. Footnote 1

  2. (b)

    Gibbsitic/boehmitic and gibbsitic/boehmitic + diasporic bauxite: at least 90% of free Al2O3 content must be in gibbsite.Footnote 2

  3. (c)

    Boehmitic bauxite: ≥ 10% boehmite, at least 95% boehmite + gibbsite.

  4. (d)

    Boehmitic/diasporic bauxite 5–10% free alumina content is in boehmite and/or diaspore.

  5. (e)

    Diasporic bauxite more than 10% of its free Al 2 O 3 content is in diaspore.

  6. (f)

    Chamositic/diasporic bauxite: chamosite content is > 5%.

Grouping of Bauxites on Their Mineralogy and Processing Properties

2.5.1 Homogenous Bauxite Deposits

The total amount of the ore can be processed by either low (140–150 °C) or high (240–280 °C) temperature digestion, that is, the whole resource can be ranked into one of the mineralogical type of ore, as listed above, the alterations can be followed on the basis of their chemical data, so that reliable sample can be taken following their chemical makeup. Furthermore, the kaolinite/quartz ratio is, more or less, constant. Variance in alumina substitution in iron minerals is tolerable. The loss in total alumina is expressed in the value of extractable alumina. Contaminants, such as concentrations of ∑CO2, ∑SO3, MnO2, P2O5 and Corg , in general,  can be kept at an acceptable level. What is acceptable? What is tolerable? These criteria should be discussed between the geologist and process engineer.

2.5.2 Heterogeneous Bauxite Deposits

2.5.2.1 Laterite Bauxites

Based on their aluminium bearing minerals different types of ores may occur in one deposit: so called low mono content type (a) and high mono content type (b, d) (most frequently in laterite bauxites type (a) and (b), that is, gibbsite/boehmite ratio changes horizontally and/or vertically. There are two possibilities:

  1. (1)

    High mono content type of ore cannot be extracted separately double digestion method is needed to apply when the boehmite content exceeds 8–10% in the tri-hydrate type bauxites. One representative sample may be enough + 2 separate samples, representing 10% of the bulk sample in weight are recommended to collect from the extreme parts of the deposit. (e.g., Az Zabirah—Saudi Arabia).

  2. (2)

    High mono content bauxite can be separately extracted. The run-off mine ore is stocked and supplied separately to different plants (e.g., Sangaredi—Guinea). Two representative samples are needed for plants of different types.

Based on the iron concentration some deposits can be divided into an iron rich (Fe2O3 typically ≥ 24–26%) and an iron poor (Fe2O3 typically: 12–15%) (e.g., Aya Ninahin, Ashanti Region—Ghana—Kesse [82]). In such cases process engineers are satisfied by three samples: One main bulk sample representing the average values and two (smaller) additional samples representing the two extremes. In case of higher iron concentration, the probability for higher alumina substitution in iron minerals (dominantly in goethite) is bigger.

2.5.2.2 Karst Bauxites

Karst bauxite mining is usually going ahead toward the depth. It may occur that the bauxite grade and mineralogy gradually change toward the depth. No average bauxite can be shipped to the plant but only an ore of continuously changing composition. When the difference does not result in necessity of modification of the technology, as it is most frequently, the consumer pays for bauxite according to its value, following the costs changed in processing. In such a situation one representative sample should be composed on the average values and two additional samples from the extremes are recommended to take in order to learn whether modifications in technology is needed and how far the processing costs may change.

When a deposit, regarding its alumina bearing minerals, is built up by two types of ore and they cannot be selectively extracted the bauxites are processed on the highest required digestion temperature, e.g., Kethro deposit where in boehmitic bauxite a diasporic ore body can be found (Nia 1971). In such cases, one representative sample may satisfy the demand with average boehmite/diaspore concentration, in case of need the bulk sample may be supported by two sub samples, as well.

At Manchester Plateau (Jamaica), in horizontal term the alumina substitution on goethite changes between 5 mol% and 18 mol% [8]. This is also the case when three samples are recommended to be collected.

Compilation of a Sampling Plan

2.6.1 Data Required

  1. (1)

    Capacity of the refinery, that is, bauxite demand (quality and quantity).

  2. (2)

    Concept of mine planning for the next 10–30 years in order to foresee the bauxites characteristics.

  3. (3)

    Run-off mine ore reserves (tonnage and grade by mining units; ore bodies).

  4. (4)

    Chemical and mineralogical analyses of the bauxite, accessory (contaminant) elements.

  5. (5)

    Quantity of the sample.

Overview of the geochemical, hydrological (drainage conditions) and geo-morphological features which are determinant in deposit geology: establishing the variance of each main element and mineral both vertically and horizontally.

2.6.2 Marking of the Sampling Sites on Map.

Number of the sampling points depends on:

  1. (1)

    Tonnage of the reserves

  2. (2)

    Number of the ore bodies taking also into account their size and shape.

  3. (3)

    Heterogeneity of the reserves to be processed (details in Appendix Sect. 2.4).

  • ad (1) As a general rule, provided the deposit represents >100 million tons of bauxite, number of sampling points should be 1 whole section (bore hole, pit, channel sampling from mine face) for every 5–6 million tons of bauxite. In case of a smaller deposit (ore body) relatively more sampling points are recommended to be marked (e.g., in case of a deposit of about 10 million tons one sampling points should represent 2.5–3 million tons.

  • ad (2) When a deposit consists of more ore bodies all of them are recommended to be sampled, provided its reserve reaches the tonnage of minimum annual production of the mine. Each ore body is to be sampled proportionally to their tonnage.

  • ad (3). If the bauxite to be sampled is heterogeneous (see Appendix Sect. 2.4) it is not always necessary to mark more sampling sites, as given above in point ad (1), but in their location its heterogeneity is to be taken into account and composition of three sample(s) are advised such as: one big bulk sample which represents the average values and two smaller additional samples for the extremes.

2.6.3 Location of Sampling Sites on Laterite Deposits

  1. (1)

    Sampling points (bore holes, pits), having been marked on a map, must be checked on site to clarify the access possibilities.

  2. (2)

    In case of surface laterite bauxite, the shape and the morphology of the ore body give the guideline for sampling points location, as the mineralogy changing in the function of drainage conditions, which are determined, beside the bedrock permeability, and the surface morphology.

  • Based on the surface morphology there are three main types of deposits such as:

    • flat plateau,

    • hill tops on undulating surfaces,

    • slopes as shown in Figs. 2.67 and 2.68.

  • In all the three the points must be located in such a way that the possible horizontal variation of mineralogy be taken into account.

  • The deposit consists of number of ore bodies developed on an undulating surface and the commercial grade ore restricts to the positive morphological forms (singe or complex heaps (e.g., Fria—Guinea, Mulanje (Malawi), Bao Loc (Vietnam, etc.). The points are to be located at the weight point(s), close to the centre and at the slopes at different topographic levels (Fig. 2.67).

  • The bauxite deposits developed on an elongated, amoeba like, quasi flat plateaux such as the bauxites developed on Deccan basalt, or khondalite in India. Sampling points are proposed to be located at the “reference points” of the deposits as it is shown in Fig. 2.67.

Fig. 2.67
figure 67

Bore holes showing the representative sampling sites on hill top and slopes of the Kondekoure (SW) ore body Fria—Guinea—Komlóssy [9]

Fig. 2.68
figure 68

Bore holes marked for representative sampling on flat surface, Jamiraplat Plateau,—Chattisgarh State—India. Komlóssy [83]

Sampling Method and Analyses

2.7.1 Sample Taking and Preparation for Analyses

  • Sampling can be made from bore holes, from pits or mining face (channelling).

  • Samples must not be taken from old pits (along the wall of old pits the bauxite quality has considerably changed (kaolinite is washed out, iron precipitated, even within a half meter width even in a very short time). As it is shown in Figs. 2.8 and 2.9 in Sect. 2.3.2 the whole extractable section must be sampled in order to cover the vertical changes in mineralogy.

  • Samples are advised to take in one meter intervals and analysed for TAl2O3, TSiO2 and Fe2O3. It is useful if:

  1. (a)

    Average AvAl2O3 and RSiO2 are also should be determined, if not in every interval, but at least for a composite sample of one section,

  2. (b)

    The accessory contaminants (Corg, ΣSO3 ΣCO2, MnO2, etc.) are also advised to be analysed in each section in order to learn how far the expected average values of these elements fit to the reserve averages.

  • Mineralogical tests of every sampled section are highly recommended to be made before the sample compilation.

  • It is advantageous if the analyses are made at the existing plant’s (if any) which utilises the bauxite or at the mine’s laboratory with the same procedure as it was done during the exploration. When the analytical methods are different the correspondence between the methods should be clarified.

  • Depending on the required total weight of the representative sample from one sampling interval 1–10 kg of wet sample is needed + two additional spare bulk samples representing about 2 × 20% in weight of the total representative sample. One spare sample may be needed for upgrading and another one for downgrading purposes.

  • For preparation of bauxite for analyses it must be ground to:

    • In case of 1 kg: grain size ≤ 4.5 mm

    • In case of 10 kg grain size ≤ 14 mm (Richards-Cherchette’s formula)

  • Before the bulk sample prepared as described above a separate bulk sample is also needed to compose for crushing and grinding test.

2.7.2 Sample Compilation

  • Weighted average chemical composition of the individual samples is to be calculated.

  • These results must be compared with that of the run-off mine ore planned to be extracted.

  • Such a calculated (theoretical) blending is to be made which satisfies the demand by adding proportional quantities from the individual samples. It is a mathematical iteration, and the result is still a theoretical composition.

  • In case of heterogeneous bauxites subsamples are also recommended to be composed (from each section) for making analyses for accessory elements (contaminants) and mineralogy. In this case the representative sample should be combined on the basis of the average values of the additional samples.

  • The well blended bulk sample must be sampled by forming a cylinder which not higher than 20 cm in case of 100 kg sample and 50 cm in case of a ton. At least three channel samplings are to be made by mixing the bauxite prior to each sampling. Sample taken out in this way must be reduced by quartering and prepared for analyses. The analytical results may be still different from the required composition.

  • Reaching of the desired composition can be made by proportional addition of the spare samples (up-grader or down-grader).

If we make the procedure correctly, we will have a bulk and reliable sample which is representative or at least very close to it.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Komlóssy, G., van Deursen, C., Raahauge, B.E. (2022). Bauxite: Geology, Mineralogy, Resources, Reserves and Beneficiation. In: Raahauge, B.E., Williams, F.S. (eds) Smelter Grade Alumina from Bauxite. Springer Series in Materials Science, vol 320. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-88586-1_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics