Skip to main content

Wearable Devices in Healthcare: Challenges, Current Trends and a Proposition of Affordable Low Cost and Scalable Computational Environment of Internet of Things

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
XXVII Brazilian Congress on Biomedical Engineering (CBEB 2020)

Part of the book series: IFMBE Proceedings ((IFMBE,volume 83))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Use of wearable devices (e.g. smart bands) for monitoring of the patients outside hospitals, clinics, and healthcare units can create productive scenarios with excellent cost-benefit. We can imagine reducing unnecessary costs such as those of professionals and physical spaces, for cases that are not required such resources. Another important aspect is that they allow integral monitoring of patients aiming at possible early diagnoses of diseases with high mortality rates, such as cardiovascular diseases. On the other hand, the approach to the Internet of Things (IoT) computing environments represents a set of interesting technologies that can support the aggregation of smart bands differentially. An example is a support for efforts aimed at the health status of the general population. In this dimension, this research presents a survey and a proposal oriented to the use of wearable devices in health care. Firstly, a set of works and prototypes already developed is presented. On the other hand, the main trends and challenges in the use of IoT devices for healthcare are pointed out. Based on the research developed, a low-cost and scalable computational environment is proposed. This environment is based on the IoT paradigm, encompassing the construction of a hardware prototype for health data collection and the development of two software components: a web system and a mobile application, which were developed for the processing and monitoring of the collected data. These data to be stored in computing resources of fog and cloud services with data analysis capability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 509.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. IHS—Institute for housing and urban development studies at https://www.ihs.nl/en

  2. Farahani B, Firouzi F, Chang V, Badaroglu M, Constant N, Mankodiya K (2018) Towards fog-driven IoT eHealth: promises and challenges of IoT in medicine and healthcare. Fut Gener Comput Syst 78(2):659–676

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Sundmaeker H, Guillemin P, Friess P, Woelfflé S (2010) Vision and challenges for realizing the internet of things. In: Cluster of European research projects on the internet of things

    Google Scholar 

  4. Tripoliti E, Papadopoulos T, Karanasiou G, Naka K, Fotiadis D (2017) Heart failure: diagnosis, severity estimation and prediction of adverse events through machine learning techniques. Comput Struct Biotechnol J 15:26–47 ISSN 2001-0370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Manyika J, Chui M, Bisson P, Woetze JR, Dobbs R, Bughin J, Aharon D (2015) The internet of things—mapping the value beyond the hype

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gravina R, Alinia P, Ghasemzadeh H, Fortino G (2016) Multi-sensor fusion in body sensor networks: state-of-the-art and research challenges. Inf Fusion

    Google Scholar 

  7. World Health Organization (2018) Cardiovascular diseases. http://www.who.int/cardiovascular_diseases/world-heart-day-2017/en/

  8. Moraes JL, Rocha MX, Vasconcelos GG, Vasconcelos Filho JE, de Albuquerque VHC, Alexandria AR (2018) Advances in photoplethysmography signal analysis for biomedical applications. Sensors 18(6)

    Google Scholar 

  9. World Health Organization (2011) Prioritized research agenda for prevention and control of non-communicable diseases

    Google Scholar 

  10. Cheng P, Dong X (2017) Life-threatening ventricular arrhythmia detection with personalized features. IEEE Access 5:14195–14203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Carvalho G, Machado M, Maia L (2005) Infarto agudo do miocárdio e morte súbita documentada. Arq Bras Cardiol 84(1):51–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Mahmud S, Wang H, Alam AM, Fang H (2017) A wireless health monitoring system using mobile phone accessories. IEEE Internet Things J 4(6):2009–2018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Yang Z, Zhou Q, Lei L, Zheng K, Xiang W (2016) An IoT-cloud based wearable ECG monitoring system for smart healthcare. J Med Syst 40(12):286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Gowrishankar S, Prachita MY, Prakash A (2017) IoT based heart attack detection, heart rate and temperature monitor. Int J Comput Appl 170(5):26–30

    Google Scholar 

  15. Zhang Z (2015) Photoplethysmography-based heart rate monitoring in physical activities via joint sparse spectrum reconstruction. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng

    Google Scholar 

  16. Li C, Hu X, Zhang L (2017) The IoT-based heart disease monitoring system for pervasive healthcare service. Procedia Comput Sci 112:2328–2334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ajitha U, Aswathi P. A, Sasidharan A, Salman V. A, Anand V, Arvind A (2017) IOT based heart attack detection and alert system. In: International journal of engineering and management research, pp 285–288

    Google Scholar 

  18. Morsch J (2015) O que é o Holter? Para que serve? Telemedicina Morsch. Available in https://telemedicinamorsch.com.br/blog/o-que-e-holter-para-que-serve. Accessed 19th Mar 2020

  19. Marx N, Deserno T (2016) Computational electrocardiography: revisiting holter ECG monitoring. Meth Inf Med 55(04):305–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Natarajan V, Vyas A (2016) Power-efficient compressive sensing for continuous monitoring of ECG and PPG in a wearable system. In: IEEE 3rd world forum on internet of things (WF-IoT), Reston, VA, pp 336–341

    Google Scholar 

  21. Cho K, Park W, Hong M, Park G, Cho W, Seo J, Han (2014) Analysis of latency performance of bluetooth low energy (BLE) networks. Sensors 15:59–78

    Google Scholar 

  22. Bonow R, Mann D, Zipes D, Libby P (2012) Braunwald’s heart disease: textbook of cardiovascular medicine, 9th ed. Saunders

    Google Scholar 

  23. Gertsch M (2009) The normal ECG and its (normal) variants. In: The ECG manual, pp. 17–36. Springer, London

    Google Scholar 

  24. Foletto L, Fischer I, Medina R, Pereira E (2020) Fog computing: análise de desempenho computacional. Anais da XVII Escola Regional de Redes de Computadores, pp 25–32. P. Alegre

    Google Scholar 

  25. Wang S, Tseng S, Yan K, Tsai Y (2018) Reaching agreement in an integrated fog cloud IoT. IEEE Access:1

    Google Scholar 

  26. Nazário DC, Dantas MAR, Todesco JL (2015) An enhanced quality of context evaluating approach in the e-health sensor platform. In: 11th ACM symposium on QoS and security for wireless and mobile networks Q2SWinet’15, pp 1–7

    Google Scholar 

  27. Nazário DC, Campos PJ, Inacio EC, Dantas MAR (2017) Quality of context evaluating approach in AAL environment using IoT technology. CBMS 2017:558–563

    Google Scholar 

  28. Silva MP, Gonçalves AL, Dantas MAR (2019) A conceptual model for quality of experience management to provide context-aware eHealth services. Future Gener Comput Syst 101:1041–1061

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Associação Brasileira de Normas Técnicas, NBR IEC 60601 (2016) Equipamento eletromédico Parte 1: Requisitos gerais para segurança básica e desempenho essencial. Rio de Janeiro

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fabrício Martins Mendonça .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Mendonça, F.M., Dantas, M.A.R., Fortunato, W.T., Oliveira, J.F.S., Souza, B.C., Filgueiras, M.Q. (2022). Wearable Devices in Healthcare: Challenges, Current Trends and a Proposition of Affordable Low Cost and Scalable Computational Environment of Internet of Things. In: Bastos-Filho, T.F., de Oliveira Caldeira, E.M., Frizera-Neto, A. (eds) XXVII Brazilian Congress on Biomedical Engineering. CBEB 2020. IFMBE Proceedings, vol 83. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-70601-2_194

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-70601-2_194

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-70600-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-70601-2

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics