Robotic Sacrocolpopexy

Conclusion

Your browser needs to be JavaScript capable to view this video

Try reloading this page, or reviewing your browser settings

This segment is the final part of video with concluding remarks.

Keywords

  • overall advantages
  • final comment

Conflict of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Ploumidis A, Spinoit AF, De Naeyer G, Schatteman P, Gan M, Ficarra V, Volpe A, Mottrie A (2014) Robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse: surgical technique and outcomes at a single high-volume institution. Eur Urol 65(1):138–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mitchell CR, Gettman M, Chow GK, Elliott D (2012) Robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy: description and video. J Endourol 26(12):1596–1599CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    White WM, Pickens RB, Elder RF, Firoozi F (2014) Robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse. Urol Clin North Am 41(4):549–557CrossRefGoogle Scholar

About this video

Author(s)
Amita Jain
First online
23 October 2020
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-4446-4_10
Online ISBN
978-981-33-4446-4
Publisher
Springer, Singapore
Copyright information
© The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Related content