The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics

2018 Edition
| Editors: Macmillan Publishers Ltd

Meaningfulness and Invariance

  • Louis Narens
  • R. Duncan Luce
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_826

Abstract

Given a qualitative scientific structure, a structure preserving mapping into a numerical, vectorial, or geometric structure is called a representation of it. Within such numerical, vectorial or geometric structures other concepts can always be defined. Some of these correspond to a qualitative property of the underlying system, and they are called ‘meaningful’ concepts. And others do not correspond to a qualitative property; and they are called ‘meaningless’. The article investigates precise meanings of ‘meaningfulness’ and ‘meaninglessness’ and their relation to several notions of invariance, some of which are widely used in science.

Keywords

Dimensional analysis Interpersonal comparison of utilities Invariance Meaningfulness Measurement Representations Scientific definability 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access

Bibliography

  1. Aczél, J., and F.S. Roberts. 1989. On the possible merging functions. Mathematical Social Sciences 17: 205–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aczél, J., F.S. Roberts, and Z. Rosenbaum. 1986. On scientific laws without dimensional constants. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications 119: 389–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Falmagne, J.-C. 1985. Elements of psychophysical theory. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Falmagne, J.-C. 2004. Meaningfulness and order-invariance: Two fundamental principles for scientific laws. Foundations of Physics 34: 1341–1348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Falmagne, J.-C., and L. Narens. 1983. Scales and meaningfulness of quantitative laws. Synthese 55: 287–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Klein, F. 1872. Vergleichende Betrachtungen iiber neuere geometrische Vorschungen: Programm zu Eintritt in die philosophische Facultät und den Senat der Universität zu Erlangen. Erlangen: Deichert.Google Scholar
  7. Krantz, D.H., R.D. Luce, P. Suppes, and A. Tversky. 1971. Foundations of measurement. Vol. 1. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  8. Luce, R.D. 1959. On the possible psychophysical laws. Psychological Review 66 (2): 81–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Luce, R.D. 1964. A generalization of a theorem of dimensional analysis. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 1: 278–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Luce, R.D. 1978. Dimensionally invariant numerical laws correspond to meaningful qualitative relations. Philosophy of Science 45: 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Luce, R.D., D.H. Krantz, P. Suppes, and A. Tversky. 1990. Foundations of measurement. Vol. 3. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
  12. Narens, L. 1981. A general theory of ratio scalability with remarks about the measurement-theoretic concept of meaningfulness. Theory and Decision 13: 1–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Narens, L. 1985. Abstract measurement theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  14. Narens, L. 2002. Theories of meaningfulness. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum and Associates.Google Scholar
  15. Narens, L. 2007. Introduction to the theories of measurement and meaningfulness and the role of invariance in science. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum and Associates.Google Scholar
  16. Narens, L., and R.D. Luce. 1983. How we may have been misled into believing in the interpersonal comparability of utility. Theory and Decision 15: 247–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Pfanzagl, J. 1968. Theory of measurement. New York: Wiley. 2nd ed. Vienna: Physica, 1971.Google Scholar
  18. Pickering, J.F., J.A. Harrison, and C.D. Cohen. 1973. Identification and measurement of consumer confidence: Methodology and some preliminary results. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A 136: 43–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Roberts, F.S. 1980. On Luce’s theory of meaningfulness. Philosophy of Science 47: 424–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Roberts, F.S. 1985. Applications of the theory of meaningfulness to psychology. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 229: 311–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Roberts, F.S., and C.H. Franke. 1976. On the theory of uniqueness in measurement. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 14: 211–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Stevens, S.S. 1946. On the theory of scales of measurement. Science 103: 677–680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Stevens, S.S. 1951. Mathematics, measurement and psychophysics. In Handbook of experimental psychology, ed. S.S. Stevens. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  24. Suppes, P., and J.L. Zinnes. 1963. Basic measurement theory. In Handbook of mathematical psychology, ed. R.D. Luce, R.R. Bush, and E. Galanter, vol. 1. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Louis Narens
    • 1
  • R. Duncan Luce
    • 1
  1. 1.