The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics

2018 Edition
| Editors: Macmillan Publishers Ltd

Fiscal Stance

  • Terry Ward
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_61

Abstract

Fiscal stance is commonly understood to denote the expansionary or contractionary implications for the economy of a government’s budgetary policy. More precisely, it represents an attempt to summarize, in a single measure, the combined effect on aggregate demand, and therefore potentially on real output and income, of all the various decisions taken by government in respect of public expenditure, taxation and other sources of revenue which go to make up a national budget. As such it presupposes not only that governments can affect demand in this way, but also that it is possible to devise an indicator of this kind which is sufficiently widely accepted as to be useful. This later proposition has been questioned even by a number of self-professed Keynesian economists, who have emphasized the difficulty both of aggregating the effects of the many different items included in the budget and of disentangling these from other potential influences on demand.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Blinder, A.S., and R.M. Solow. 1974. Analytical foundations of fiscal policy. In The economics of public finance, ed. A.S. Blinder et al. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
  2. Brown, E.C. 1956. Fiscal policy in the thirties: A reappraisal. American Economic Review 46: 857–879.Google Scholar
  3. Buiter, W.H. 1983. The theory of optimum deficits and debt. In The economics of large government deficits. Boston: Federal Reserve Bank of Boston.Google Scholar
  4. Buiter, W.H. 1985. A guide to public sector debt and deficits. Economic Policy 1: 13–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chand, S.K. 1978. Summary measures of fiscal influence. In IMF Staff Papers 24, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  6. Committee for Economic Development. 1947. Taxes and the budget: A program for prosperity in a free economy. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  7. Dernberg, T.F. 1975. Fiscal analysis in the Federal Republic of Germany: The cyclically neutral budget. IMF Staff Papers 22: 825–827.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kaldor, N. 1944. Appendix C of W.H. Beveridge. In Full employment in a free society. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  9. Lotz, J. 1971. Techniques of measuring the effects of fiscal policy, OECD economic outlook, Occasional studies. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  10. Netherlands Ministry of Finance. 1970. The Netherlands budget memorandum 1970, Annex 2. The Hague.Google Scholar
  11. OECD. 1984. Economic outlook. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  12. Okun, A.M., and Teeters, N.H. 1970. The full employment surplus revisited. Brookings Papers on Economics Activity No. 1, 770–110.Google Scholar
  13. Price, R.W.R., and Muller, P. 1984. Structural budget indicators and the interpretation of fiscal policy stance in OECD ‘economies’. OECD Economic Studies (3): 27–72.Google Scholar
  14. Tanzi, V. (ed.). 1984. Taxation, inflation and interest rates. Washington, DC: IMF.Google Scholar
  15. Taylor, C.T., and Threadgold, A.R. 1979. Real national savings and its sectoral composition. Bank of England Discussion Papers No. 6. London: Economic Intelligence Department, Bank of England.Google Scholar
  16. Tobin, J., and W.H. Buiter. 1976. Long run effects of fiscal and monetary policy on aggregate demand. In Monetarism, ed. J.L. Stein. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
  17. Ward, T.S., and R.R. Neild. 1978. The measurement and reform of budgetary policy. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Terry Ward
    • 1
  1. 1.