The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics

2018 Edition
| Editors: Macmillan Publishers Ltd

Capital Perversity

  • Tatsuo Hatta
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_488

Abstract

Neoclassical capital theory regards the interest rate as the market price of the composite factor ‘capital’. In this theory the interest rate is equal to the marginal product of capital, since the demand curve for capital is its marginal productivity schedule. Moreover, the theory assumes that capital obeys the law of diminishing returns just like any other factor, so that its demand curve is downward-sloping. In an economy where labour is the only primary factor and constant returns to scale prevail, this implies the following postulate: as the interest rate falls, the capital – labour ratio increases, which plays an important role in neoclassical growth theory and in comparative static analyses of interest rate determination.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access

Bibliography

  1. Blaug, M. 1974. The Cambridge revolution: Success or failure? London: The Institute of Economic Affairs.Google Scholar
  2. Bruno, M., E. Burmeister, and E. Sheshinski. 1966. The nature and implications of the reswitching of techniques. Quarterly Journal of Economics 80: 526–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Burmeister, E. 1980. Capital theory and dynamics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Burmeister, E., and R. Dobell. 1970. Mathematical theories of economic growth. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  5. Champernowne, D.G. 1953–4. The production function and the theory of capital: A comment. Review of Economic Studies 21: 112–135.Google Scholar
  6. Harcourt, G.C. 1972. Some Cambridge controversies in the theory of capital. London: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hatta, T. 1976. The paradox in capital theory and complementarity of inputs. Review of Economic Studies 43: 127–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hicks, J. 1946. Value and capital, 2nd ed. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Pasinetti, L.L., et al. 1966. Paradoxes in capital theory: A symposium. Quarterly Journal of Economics 80: 503–583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Robinson, J. 1953–4. The production function and the theory of capital. Review of Economic Studies 21: 81–106.Google Scholar
  11. Robinson, J. 1956. The accumulation of capital. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  12. Samuelson, P.A. 1966. A summing up. Quarterly Journal of Economics 80: 568–583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Solow, R. 1975. Brief comments. Quarterly Journal of Economics 89: 48–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Sraffa, P. 1960. Production of commodities by means of commodities prelude to a critique of economic theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  15. von Weizsäcker, C.C. 1971. Steady state capital theory. Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tatsuo Hatta
    • 1
  1. 1.