The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics

2018 Edition
| Editors: Macmillan Publishers Ltd

Common Land

  • T. Williamson
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_475

Abstract

The legal status of common land is a source of considerable popular confusion. With the notable exception of some village greens, commons do not represent areas which are owned by nobody, nor areas which are owned by everybody, nor even by everybody within a given locality. Since the early medieval period, commons have been owned by specific individuals, usually the lord of the manor within which they lie. The term ‘common’ refers not to ownership, but to rights held in common by certain people to use the product of the soil of the area in question. In turn, this means that the owner cannot enclose the land; hence the unfenced open space which is still the most characteristic feature of a common (Campbell and Clayden 1980).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Bibliography

  1. Campbell, I., and P. Clayden. 1980. The law of commons and village greens. Henley-on-Thames: Open Spaces Society.Google Scholar
  2. Hoskins, W.G., and L. Dudley Stamp. 1967. The common lands of England and Wales. London: Collins.Google Scholar
  3. Rackham, O. 1976. Trees and woodland in the British landscape. London: Dent.Google Scholar
  4. Snell, K. 1985. Annals of the Labouring poor: Social change and agrarian England 1660–1900. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Turner, M.E. 1980. English parliamentary enclosure. Folkestone: William Dawson.Google Scholar
  6. Wade Martins, P. 1975. The origins of rural settlement in East Anglia. In Recent work in rural archaeology, ed. P.J. Fowler. Bradford on Avon: Moonraker Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • T. Williamson
    • 1
  1. 1.