Skip to main content

Cost–Benefit Analysis

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics
  • 149 Accesses

Abstract

Cost–benefit analysis (CBA) is a collection of methods and rules for assessing the social costs and benefits of alternative public policies. It promotes efficiency by identifying the set of feasible projects that would yield the largest positive net benefits to society. The willingness of people to pay to gain or avoid policy impacts is the guiding principle for measuring benefits. Opportunity cost is the guiding principle for measuring costs. CBA requires that appropriate shadow prices be derived when policies have effects beyond those that can be taken into account as changes of prices or quantities in undistorted markets.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 6,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 8,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Arrow, K. 1963. Social choice and individual values. 2nd ed. NewHaven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateman, I., and K. Willis, eds. 2000. Valuing environmental preferences theory and practice of the contingent valuation method in the US EC and developing countries. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackorby, C., and D. Donaldson. 1990. A review article: The case against the use of the sum of compensating variation in cost–benefit analysis. Canadian Journal of Economics 23: 471–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boardman, A., D. Greenberg, A. Vining, and D. Weimer. 2006. Cost–benefit analysis: Concepts and practice. 3rd ed. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradford, D. 1975. Constraints on government investment opportunities and the choice of discount rate. American Economic Review 65: 887–899.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clawson, M., and J. Knetsch. 1966. Economics of outdoor recreation. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • David, R. 1963. Recreation planning as an economic problem. Natural Resources Journal 3: 239–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dinwiddy, C., and F. Teal. 1996. Principles of cost-benefit analysis for developing countries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dolan, P. 2000. The measurement of health-related quality of life for use in resource allocation in health care. In Handbook of health economics 1B, ed. A. Culyer and J. Newhouse. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, D. 1981. Cost–benefit analysis under uncertainty. American Economic Review 71: 715–725.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gramlich, E. 1990. A guide to benefit-cost analysis. 2nd ed. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hahn, R., and C. Sunstein. 2002. A new executive order for improving federal regulation? Deeper and wider cost-benefit analysis. University of Pennsylvania Law Review 150: 1389–1552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, J.R. 1939. The valuation of social income. Economica 7: 105–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • HM Treasury. 2002. The green book: Appraisal and evaluation in central government. London: The Stationary Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hochman, H., and J. Rogers. 1969. Pareto optimal redistribution. American Economic Review 59: 542–557.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaldor, N. 1940. Welfare propositions of economics and interpersonal comparisons of utility. Economic Journal 49: 549–552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krutilla, J. 1967. Conservation reconsidered. American Economic Review 57: 777–786.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson, D., and P. Flacco. 1992. Measuring option prices from market behavior. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 22: 178–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Little, I., and J. Mirlees. 1974. Project appraisal and planning for developing countries. London: Heinemann Educational.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKenzie, G. 1983. Measuring economic welfare. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, T. 2000. Variations between countries in the values of statistical life. Transport Economics and Policy 34: 169–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mishan, E. 1968. What is producer’s surplus? American Economic Review 58: 1269–1282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, M., A. Boardman, A. Vining, D. Weimer, and D. Greenberg. 2004. ‘Just give me a number!’ Practical values for the social discount rate. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 23: 789–812.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scitovsky, T. 1941. A note on welfare propositions in economics. Review of Economic Studies 41: 77–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seade, J. 1978. Consumer’s surplus and linearity of Engel curves. Review of Economic Studies 9: 77–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, V., and J. Huang. 1995. Can markets value air quality? A meta analysis of hedonic property value models. Journal of Political Economy 103: 209–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Squire, L., and H. van der Tak. 1975. Economic analysis of projects. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steiner, P. 1974. Public expenditure budgeting. In The economics of public finance, ed. A. Blinder et al. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sugden, R., and A. Williams. 1978. Principles of practical cost–benefit analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viscusi, W., and J. Aldy. 2003. The value of statistical life: A critical review of market estimates throughout the world. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 27: 5–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weisbrod, B. 1964. Collective consumption services of individual consumption goods. Quarterly Journal of Economics 78: 71–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whittington, D., and D. MacRae. 1986. The issue of standing in cost–benefit analysis. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 5: 665–682.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willig, R. 1976. Consumer’s surplus without apology. American Economic Review 66: 589–597.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zerbe, R. Jr. 1998. Is cost–benefit analysis legal? Three rules. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 17: 419–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Copyright information

© 2018 Macmillan Publishers Ltd.

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Weimer, D.L. (2018). Cost–Benefit Analysis. In: The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_381

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics