The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics

2018 Edition
| Editors: Macmillan Publishers Ltd

Dialectical Reasoning

  • Gareth Stedman Jones
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_319

Abstract

This notoriously elusive and multifaceted notion assumed importance in the history of political economy because Marx’s ‘critique of political economy’, Capital, and particularly its first draft, the Grundrisse of 1857–8, was presented in a dialectical form. Part of the difficulty of encapsulating the dialectic within any concise definition derives from the fact that it may be conceived as a method of thought, a set of laws governing the world, the immanent movement of history or any combination of the three. The dialectic originated in ancient Greek philosophy. The original meaning of ‘dialogos’ was to reason by splitting in two. In one form of its development, dialectic was associated with reason. Starting with Zeno’s paradoxes, dialectical forms of reasoning were found in most of the philosophies of the ancient world and continued into medieval forms of disputation. It was this form of reasoning that Kant attacked in his distinction between the logic of understanding which, applied to the data of sensation, yielded knowledge of the phenomenal world, and dialectic or the logic of reasoning, which proceeded independently of experience and purported to give knowledge of the transcendent order of things in themselves. In another form of dialectic, the focus was primarily upon process: either an ascending dialectic in which the existence of a higher reality is demonstrated, or a descending form in which this higher reality is shown to manifest itself in the phenomenal world. Such conceptions were particularly associated with Christian eschatology, neo-platonism and illuminism, and typically patterned themselves into conceptions of original unity, division or loss, and ultimate reunification.

Keywords

Capitalism Civil society Dialectical materialism Dialectical reasoning Engels, F. Equal exchange Hegel, G. W. F. Marx, K. H. Materialist conception of history Political economy Proudhon, P. J. Ricardo’s theory of value Surplus labour Use value 

JEL Classifications

B4 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access

Bibliography

  1. Althusser, L. 1965. For Marx. London: Allen Lane. 1969.Google Scholar
  2. Bernstein, E. 1899. Evolutionary socialism. Stuttgart. English trans. E.C. Harvey. London: Independent Labour Party. 1909.Google Scholar
  3. Bhaskar, R. 1983. Dialectic, materialism and human emancipation. London: New Left Books.Google Scholar
  4. Cohen, G. 1978. Karl Marx’s theory of history: A defence. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Della Volpe, G. 1950. Logica come scienza positiva. Messina: G. d’Anna.Google Scholar
  6. Elster, J. 1985. Making sense of Marx. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Hegel, G.W.F. 1812–1816. The science of logic. London: Allen & Unwin. 1961.Google Scholar
  8. Kolakowski, L. 1978. Main currents of Marxism Vol. I: The founders. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Lukács, G. 1923. History and class consciousness. London: Merlin. 1971.Google Scholar
  10. Marx, K. 1844. Economic and philosophical manuscripts of 1844. In Collected works, ed. K. Marx and F. Engels, vol. 3. London: Lawrence & Wishart. 1975.Google Scholar
  11. Marx, K. 1847. The poverty of philosophy. In: Collected works. vol. 6. London: Lawrence & Wishart. 1976a.Google Scholar
  12. Marx, K. 1857–8. Grundrisse. Harmondsworth: Penguin. 1973.Google Scholar
  13. Marx, K. 1873. Capital. Vol. I. 2nd ed. Harmondsworth: Penguin. 1976b.Google Scholar
  14. Rosdolsky, R. 1968. The making of Marxs capital. Trans. P. Burgeis. London: Pluto Press. 1977.Google Scholar
  15. Steedman, I. 1979. Marx on Ricardo. Discussion Paper No. 10, Department of Economics, University of Manchester.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gareth Stedman Jones
    • 1
  1. 1.