The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics

2018 Edition
| Editors: Macmillan Publishers Ltd

Use of Experiments in Health Care

  • Joseph P. Newhouse
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_3013

Abstract

Two of the best known randomised trials in health economics are described in detail in this chapter: the RAND Health Insurance Experiment and the Oregon Health Insurance Experiment. The RAND Experiment randomised participants to health insurance plans that varied the cost of care from free care at one extreme to an approximation of a large deductible at the other. Those on the free care plan increased their use of services by about 30% relative to those on the large deductible plan. For the average participant there appeared to be little or no effect on health outcomes from this change in use. Among the poor with hypertension (high blood pressure), however, blood pressure was better controlled on the free care plan, which projected to about a 10% decrease in the risk of mortality. The Oregon Experiment randomised its participants to Medicaid or to remaining uninsured; those with Medicaid insurance used more services and suffered less from depression.

Keywords

Field experiments Health insurance Health insurance experiment Randomised trials 

JEL Classifications

I13 I18 C9 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Bibliography

  1. Ansah, E.K., S. Narh-Bana, S. Asiamah, et al. 2009. Effect of removing direct payment for health care on utilisation and health outcomes in Ghanaian children: A randomised controlled trial. PLoS Medicine 6(1): 48–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aron-Dine, A., L. Einav, and A. Finkelstein. 2013. The RAND Health Insurance Experiment, three decades later. Journal of Economic Perspectives 27(1): 197–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arrow, K.J. 1963. Uncertainty and the welfare economics of medical care. American Economic Review 53(5): 941–73.Google Scholar
  4. Baicker, K., and D.P. Goldman. 2011. Patient cost sharing and health care spending growth. Journal of Economic Perspectives 25(2): 47–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baicker, K., S.L. Taubman, H.L. Allen, et al. 2013. The Oregon Experiment – Effects of Medicaid on clinical outcomes. New England Journal of Medicine 368(18): 1713–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chandra, A., J. Gruber, and R. McKnight. 2010. Patient cost-sharing and hospitalization offsets in the elderly. American Economic Review 100(1): 193–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chandra, A., J. Gruber, and R. McKnight. 2014. The impact of patient cost sharing on the poor: Evidence from Massachusetts. Journal of Health Economics 33: 57–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Choudhry, N.K., J. Avorn, R.J. Glynn, et al. 2011. Full coverage for preventive medications after myocardial infarction. New England Journal of Medicine 365(22): 2088–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Choudhry, N.K., K. Bykov, W.H. Shrank, et al. 2014. Eliminating medication copayments reduces disparities in cardiovascular care. Health Affairs 33(5): 863–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Congressional Budget Office. 2006. Consumer-directed health plans: Potential effects on health care spending and outcomes. Washington, DC: Congressional Budget Office.Google Scholar
  11. Congressional Budget Office. 2010. Selected CBO publications related to health care legislation, 2009–2010. Washington, DC: Congressional Budget Office.Google Scholar
  12. Congressional Budget Office. 2013. Health-related options for reducing the deficit: 2014 to 2023. Washington, DC: Congressional Budget Office.Google Scholar
  13. Cookson, R., and K. Claxton (eds.). 2012. The humble economist: Tony Culyer on health, health care, and social decision making. York: York Publishing Services.Google Scholar
  14. Duan, N., W.G. Manning Jr., C.N. Morris, et al. 1983. A comparison of alternative models of the demand for medical care. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 1(2): 115–25.Google Scholar
  15. Evans, R.G. 1984. Strained Mercy: The economics of Canadian health care. Toronto: Butterworths.Google Scholar
  16. Finkelstein, A., and S.L. Taubman. 2015. Randomize evaluations to improve health care delivery. Science 347(6223): 720–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Finkelstein, A., S. Taubman, B. Wright, et al. 2011. The Oregon Health Insurance Experiment: Evidence from the first year. Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Institute of Medicine. 1999. To err is human. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  19. Institute of Medicine. 2001. Crossing the quality chasm: A new health system for the 21st century. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  20. Manning, W.G., J.P. Newhouse, N. Duan, et al. 1987. Health insurance and the demand for medical care: Results from a randomized experiment. American Economic Review 77(3): 251–77.Google Scholar
  21. Michalopoulos, C., D. Wittenburg, D.A.R. Israel, et al. 2011. The accelerated benefits demonstration and evaluation project: Impacts on health and employment at twelve months. New York: Manpower Demonstration Research Corporation.Google Scholar
  22. Newhouse, J.P., and The Insurance Experiment Group. 1993. Free for all? Lessons from the RAND Health Insurance Experiment. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Newhouse, J.P., R.H. Brook, N. Duan, et al. 2008. Attrition in the RAND Health Insurance Experiment: A response to Nyman. Journal of Health Politics, Policy, and Law 33(2): 295–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Nyman, J.A. 2007. American health policy: Cracks in the foundation? Journal of Health Politics, Policy, and Law 32(5): 759–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Olken, B.A., J. Onishi, and S. Wong. 2011. Indonesia’s PNPM Generasi program: Final impact evaluation report. Washington, DC: The World Bank.Google Scholar
  26. Pauly, M.V. 1968. Comment. American Economic Review 58(3): 531–7.Google Scholar
  27. Powell-Jackson, T., K. Hanson, C.J.M. Whitty, et al. 2014. Who benefits from free healthcare? Evidence from a randomized experiment in Ghana. Journal of Development Economics 107: 305–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rice, T.H. 1998. The economics of health reconsidered. Chicago: Health Administration Press.Google Scholar
  29. Robins, P.K. 1985. A comparison of the labor supply findings from the four negative income tax experiments. Journal of Human Resources 20(4): 567–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Rothschild, M., and J. Stiglitz. 1976. Equilibrium in competitive insurance markets: An essay on the economics of imperfect information. Quarterly Journal of Economics 90(4): 629–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sine, J.J. 1994. Demand for episodes of care in the China Health Insurance Experiment. Santa Monica: Rand. Pardee RAND Graduate School.Google Scholar
  32. Taubman, S.L., H.L. Allen, B.J. Wright, et al. 2014. Medicaid increases emergency department use: Evidence from Oregon’s Health Insurance Experiment. Science 343(6168): 263–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joseph P. Newhouse
    • 1
  1. 1.