Abstract
Monopsonistic discrimination refers to a situation in which employers differentiate pay between groups of workers who exhibit different elasticities of labour supply. The concept of dynamic monopsony has revived the idea of monopsonistic discrimination in the labour market. As there are frictions in the job-to-job mobility of workers, firms may exercise market power even in labour markets with thousands of employers. If there are more frictions in the labour market for women than for men, a gender wage gap may arise as employers exploit this difference and segment their pay policy towards each gender.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Bibliography
Albanesi, S., and C. Olivetti. 2009. Home production, market production and the gender wage gap: Incentives and expectations. Review of Economic Dynamics 12(1): 80–107.
Arrow, K.J. 1973. The theory of discrimination. In Discrimination in labour markets, ed. O. Ashenfelter and A. Rees. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Barth, E., and H. Dale-Olsen. 2009. Monopsonistic discrimination, worker turnover and the gender wage gap. Labour Economics 16: 589–597.
Barth, E., A. Bryson, J.C. Davis, and R.B. Freeman. 2015. It’s where you work: Increases in earnings dispersion across establishments and individuals in the U.S. Journal of Labor Economics (forthcoming).
Becker, G.S. 1971. The economics of discrimination. 2nd ed. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Bergmann, B.R. 1974. Occupational segregation, wages and profits when employers discriminate by race or sex. Eastern Economic Journal 1(2): 103–110.
Blau, F.D., and L.M. Kahn. 2006. The U.S. gender pay gap in the 1990s: Slowing convergence. Industrial and Labour Relations Review 60(1): 45–66.
Burdett, K., and D. Mortensen. 1998. Equilibrium wage differentials and employer size. International Economic Review 39: 257–273.
Card, D., A.R. Cardoso, and P. Kline. 2015. Bargaining, sorting, and the gender wage gap: Quantifying the impact of firms on the relative pay of women, NBER Working Papers 21403. Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research.
Falch, T. 2010. Teacher mobility responses to wage changes: Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment. American Economic Review 101(3): 460–465.
Goldin, C. 2006. The quiet revolution that transformed women’s employment, education, and family. American Economic Review 96(2): 1–21.
Goldin, C. 2014. A grand gender convergence: Its last chapter. American Economic Review 104(4): 1091–1119.
Green, F., S. Machin, and A. Manning. 1996. The employer size-wage effect: Can dynamic monopsony provide an explanation? Oxford Economic Papers 48: 433–455.
Hirsch, B., T. Schank, and C. Schnabel. 2010. Differences in labour supply to monopsonistic firms and the gender pay gap: An empirical analysis using linked employer-employee data from Germany. Journal of Labour Economics 28(2): 291–330.
Keith, K., and A. McWilliams. 1999. The returns to mobility and job search by gender. Industrial and Labour Relations Review 52: 463–474.
Loprest, P.J. 1993. Gender differences in wage growth and job mobility. American Economic Review 82: 526–532.
Lucifora, C., and B. Reilly. 1990. Wage discrimination and female occupational intensity. Labour 4: 147–168.
Manning, A. 1996. The Equal Pay Act as an experiment to test theories of the labour market. Economica 63: 191–212.
Manning, A. 2003. Monopsony in motion. Imperfect competition in labour markets. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Nanos, P., and C. Schluter. 2014. The composition of wage differentials between migrants and natives. European Economic Review 65(C): 23–44.
Ransom, M., and R. Oaxaca. 2010. New market power models and sex differences in pay. Journal of Labour Economics 28(2): 267–290.
Robinson, J. 1933. The economics of imperfect competition. London: Macmillan.
Sicherman, N. 1996. Gender differences in departures from a large firm. Industrial and Labour Relations Review 49: 484–505.
Staiger, D.O., J. Spetz, and C.S. Phibbs. 2010. Is there monopsony in the labour market? Evidence from a natural experiment. Journal of Labour Economics 28(2): 211–236.
Webber, D.A. 2013. Firm market power and the earnings distribution, IZA Discussion Papers 7342. Bonn: Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Copyright information
© 2018 Macmillan Publishers Ltd.
About this entry
Cite this entry
Barth, E. (2018). Monopsonistic Discrimination and the Gender Wage Gap. In: The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_3010
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_3010
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-95188-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-95189-5
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences