This article considers inequality in preindustrial societies, defined as those prior to the industrial revolution and subsequent non-industrial societies that are not systematically integrated into the advanced world’s economy. Although data on individual incomes and wealth in these societies are limited, increasingly they are becoming available. On the basis of these data, inequality as measured by the Gini coefficient is often on a par with modern industrialized societies, but the income gradient tends to be different, with a mass of people at subsistence level or marginally above, few at the mean, and a small affluent class. More work remains to be done, particularly on the relationship between income inequality and economic progress.
KeywordsGini coefficient Income distribution Inequality Kuznets curve Preindustrial societies
JEL ClassificationsD31 N30 O1
I am grateful to Mihail Arandarenko, Peter Lindert, Leandro Prados de la Escosura and Jeffrey Williamson for excellent comments.
- Allen, R.C. 2007. How prosperous were the Romans? Evidence from Diocletian’s Price Edict (AD 301), Discussion Paper Series 363. Oxford: University of Oxford, Department of Economics, October.Google Scholar
- Berry, A. 1990. International trade, government and income distribution in Peru since 1870. Latin American Research Review 25(2): 31–59.Google Scholar
- Bértola, L., C. Castelnovo, E. Reis, and H. Willebald 2006. Income distribution in Brazil, 1839–1939. Paper presented at Session 116 of “A Global History of Income Distribution in the Long 20th Century,” XIV International Economic History Congress, Helsinki-Finland 21–25 August.Google Scholar
- Bértola, L., C. Castelnovo, J. Rodriguez, and H. Willeband 2009. Income distribution in Latin American Southern Cone countries during the first globalization boom, ca. 1870–1920. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, forthcoming.Google Scholar
- Cosgel, M. 2004. Ottoman tax registers. Historical Methods 37(2), Spring, 87–100.Google Scholar
- de Tocqueville, A. 1835. Memoir on pauperism, 1997. Chicago: Ivan R. Dee.Google Scholar
- Engerman, S., and K. Sokoloff 1997. Factor endowments, institutions and differential paths of growth among New World economies. In How Latin America fell behind: Essays on the economic histories of Brazil and Mexico, 1800–1914, ed. S. Hager, 260–304. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
- Finley, M. 1985. The ancient economy, 2nd ed. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
- Frank, A.G. 1998. Re-orient: Global economy in the Asian age. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
- Herlihy, D., and C. Klapisch-Zuber. 1985. Tuscans and their families. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
- Herlihy, D., C. Klapisch-Zuber, R.B. Litchfield, and A. Molho The online catasto. Available at: http://www.stg.brown.edu/projects/catasto/overview.html. Accessed January 2008 (a searchable online database of tax information for the city of Florence in 1427–29, based on D. Herlihy and C. Klapisch-Zuber, principal investigators, Census and property survey of Florentine dominions in the province of Tuscany, 1427–1480).
- Kuznets, S. 1955. Economic growth and income inequality, presidential address to the 67th meeting of the American Economic Association, Michigan, December 1954; published in American Economic Review 45 (1955) and Economic growth and structure: Selected essays. New Delhi: Oxford and IBH, 1965.Google Scholar
- Laiou, A. 2002. The economic history of Byzantium: From the seventh through the fifteenth century. Washington, DC: Dumbarton Oaks.Google Scholar
- Lindert, P.H. 2000. Three centuries of inequality in Britain and the United Stares. In Handbook of income distribution, ed. A. Atkinson and F. Bourguignon. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
- Malanima, P. 2006. Pre-modern equality: Income distribution in the Kingdom of Naples (1811). Paper presented at 14th International Congress of Economic History, August 2006, Helsinki. Available at: http://www.helsinki.fi/iehc2006/papers3/Malanima.pdf.
- Mayhew, N.J. 1995. Modeling medieval monetization. In A commercialising economy: England 1086 to c. 1300, ed. R.N. Britnell and B.M.S. Campbell, 55–77. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
- Milanovic, B., P.H. Lindert, and J.G. Williamson 2009. Preindustrial inequality. Unpublished ms, available at: http://econ.worldbank.org/projects/inequality. Previous version published as Measuring ancient inequality, National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No. 13550.
- Pareto, V. 1896. La courbe de la repartition de la richesse. Université de Lausanne. Republished as On the distribution of wealth and income, Rivista di Politica Economica, 645–660, 1997. (The same issue of Rivista di Politica Economica contains English translations of five other articles by Pareto on the same topic.)Google Scholar
- Pen, J. 1971. Income distribution: Facts, theories, policies. New York/Washington, DC: Praeger.Google Scholar
- Polanyi, K. 1944. The great transformation. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
- Pomerantz, K. 2000. The great divergence: China, Europe, and the making of the modern world economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Prados de la Escosura, L. 2007. Inequality and poverty in Latin America: A long-run exploration. In The new comparative economic history: Essays in honor of Jeffrey G. Williamson, ed. T.J. Hutton, K.H. O’Rourke, and A.M. Taylor, pp. 291–315. Boston: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Rawls, J. 1971. A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Rostovtzeff, M. 1926. The social and economic history of the Roman Empire, 1957. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Scheidel, W., and S.J. Friesen 2009. The size of the economy and the distribution of income in the Roman Empire. Princeton/Stanford Working Papers in Classics, January.Google Scholar
- Schiavone, A. 1995. The end of the past: Ancient Rome and the modern West, 2000. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Shiue, C., and W. Keller 2007. Markets in China and Europe on the eve of the industrial revolution. American Economic Review 97: 1189–1216, September.Google Scholar
- Soltow, L. 1989. Income and wealth inequality in Amsterdam, 1585–1805. Economisch-en-Social Historisch 58: 72–95.Google Scholar
- Soltow, L., and J.-L. van Zanden. 1998. Income and wealth inequality in the Netherlands, 16th–20th century. Amsterdam: Het Spinhuis.Google Scholar
- Sussman, N. 2005. Income inequality in Paris at the heyday of the commercial revolution. Jerusalem: Hebrew University. Available at: http://economics.huji.ac.il/facultye/sussman/sussman_gobaleconomies.pdf.
- Walbank, F.W. 1946. The decline of the Roman Empire in the West. London: Cobbett Press.Google Scholar
- Wen, J.G. 2009. Why was China trapped in an agrarian society – An economicgeographical approach to the Needham puzzle. New History, forthcoming.Google Scholar
- Williamson, J.G. 1982. The structure of pay in Britain, 1710–1911. Research in Economic History 7: 1–54.Google Scholar
- Williamson, J.G. 1985. Did British capitalism breed inequality? Boston: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
- Williamson, J.G. 2009. History without evidence: Latin American inequality since 1491. Mimeo.Google Scholar