Lehman Brothers Bankruptcy, What Lessons can be Drawn?
There is disagreement about whether large and complex financial institutions should be allowed to use US bankruptcy law to reorganise when they get into financial difficulty. We look at the events surrounding the Lehman Brothers bankruptcy filing for lessons as to whether bankruptcy law could be used to produce an orderly windup of the affairs of a failed financial firm. If so, then judicial resolution under the US Bankruptcy Code might be a better alternative to bailouts or to resolution under the Dodd–Frank Act’s orderly liquidation authority. We find that there is no clear evidence that bankruptcy law is insufficient to handle the resolution of large complex financial firms.
KeywordsBankruptcy Causation Contagion Dodd–Frank Insolvency Orderly resolution authority
- Ayotte, K., and D.A. Skeel Jr. 2010. Bankruptcy or bailouts? The Journal of Corporation Law 35(3): 469–498.Google Scholar
- Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. 2011. Study on the resolution of financial companies under the Bankruptcy Code.Google Scholar
- Cumming, C., and R.A. Eisenbeis. 2010. Resolving troubled systemically important cross-border financial institutions: Is a new corporate organizational form required? Federal Reserve Bank of New York Staff Report, vol. 457.Google Scholar
- Edwards, F., and E.R. Morrison. 2005. Derivatives and the bankruptcy code: Why the special treatment? Yale Journal on Regulation 22: 101–132.Google Scholar
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC). 2011. The orderly liquidation of Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. Under the Dodd–Frank Act. FDIC Quarterly 5(2): 1–19.Google Scholar
- Furlong, F.T. 1984. FDIC’s modified payout plan. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco Economic Letter, 18 May.Google Scholar
- Mengle, D.L. 2007. Credit derivatives: An overview. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta Economic Review 92(4): 1–24.Google Scholar
- Miller, H. R. 2009. Testimony before the Subcommittee on Commercial and Administrative Law of the House of Representatives Committee on the Judiciary, 111th Congress, 1st Session, for Hearings on ‘Too big to fail: The role for bankruptcy and antitrust law in financial regulation reform’, 22 October.Google Scholar
- Miller, H.R. 2010. Testimony before the financial crisis inquiry commission for hearing on examining the causes of the current financial and economic crisis of the United States and of the collapse of Lehman Brothers, 22 October.Google Scholar
- Roe, M.J. 2011. The derivatives players’ payment priorities as financial crisis accelerator. Stanford Law Review 63: 539–588.Google Scholar
- Senior Supervisors Group. 2009. Observations on management of recent credit default swap credit events, Available at: http://www.sec.gov/news/press/2009/report030909.pdf.
- Skeel, D.A. 2010. Bankruptcy boundary games. Brooklyn Journal of Corporate, Financial and Commercial Law 4: 1–21.Google Scholar
- Skeel, D. 2011. The new financial deal: Understanding the Dodd–Frank Act and its (Unintended) consequences. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
- Sprague, I.H. 1986. Bailout: An insider’s account of bank failures and rescues. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
- Summe, K.A. 2009. Chapter 5, Lessons learned from the Lehman bankruptcy. In Ending government bailouts as we know them, ed. K.E. Scott, G.P. Schultz, and J.B. Taylor. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
- Thornton, D.L. 2009. What the Libor-OIS spread says. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Economic Synopses,vol. 24.Google Scholar