The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics

2018 Edition
| Editors: Macmillan Publishers Ltd

Ostrom, Elinor (1933–2012)

  • Paul Dragos Aligica
  • Peter Boettke
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_2923

Abstract

Elinor Ostrom, a recipient of the Sveriges Riksbank Prize in Economic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel 2009, had a foundational contribution to the Public Choice movement and to the rise of the new institutionalism and has been a key figure in the resurgence of political economy. Her studies of common pool resources, economic governance and institutional diversity are an attempt to transcend the ‘markets vs. states’ dichotomy and are marked by a distinctive approach, relying on multiple methods, interdisciplinary collaborative teamwork and the primacy of empirical observations in field and laboratory settings.

Keywords

Common pool resources Economic governance Institutionalism Public choice Public economies Political economy 

JEL Classifications

B31 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Bibliography

  1. Aligica, P.D., and P. Boettke. 2009. Challenging institutional analysis and development: The Bloomington school. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Buchanan, J. 1977. Democracy in deficit (with R. Wagner). New York: Academic.Google Scholar
  3. Buchanan, J.M., and G. Tullock. 1962. The calculus of consent: Logical foundations of constitutional democracy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Demsetz, H. 1967. Toward a theory of property rights. American Economic Review 57 (2): 347–359.Google Scholar
  5. Downs, A. 1957. An economic theory of democracy. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  6. Hardin, G. 1968. The tragedy of the commons. Science 162: 1243–1248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. McGinnis, M.D., ed. 1999. Polycentricity and local public economies: Readings from the workshop in political theory and policy analysis. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  8. McGuire, T., M. Coiner, and L. Spancake. 1979. Budget maximizing agencies and efficiency in government. Public Choice 34 (3/4): 333–359.Google Scholar
  9. Niskanen, W.A. 1971. Bureaucracy and representative government. Chicago: Aldine-Atherton.Google Scholar
  10. Olson, M. 1965. The logic of collective action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Ostrom, E. 1968. Some postulated effects of learning on constitutional behavior. Public Choice 5: 87–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ostrom, E. 1972. Metropolitan reform: Propositions derived from two traditions. Social Science Quarterly 53: 474–493.Google Scholar
  13. Ostrom, E., ed. 1976a. The delivery of urban services: Outcomes of change. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
  14. Ostrom, E. 1976b. Size and performance in a federal system. Publius: The Journal of Federalism 6 (2): 33–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ostrom, E. 1983. A public choice approach to metropolitan institutions: Structure, incentives, and performance. The Social Science Journal 20 (3): 79–96.Google Scholar
  16. Ostrom, E. 1986. An agenda for the study of institutions. Public Choice 48 (1): 3–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ostrom, E. 1990. Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ostrom, E. 1998a. The comparative study of public economies. Presented upon acceptance of the Frank E. Seidman distinguished award in political economy. Memphis: P.K. Seidman Foundation.Google Scholar
  19. Ostrom, E. 1998b. A behavioral approach to the rational choice theory of collective action. American Political Science Review 92 (1): 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ostrom, E. 1999. Coping with tragedies of the commons. Annual Review of Political Science 2: 493–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ostrom, E. 2000. The danger of self-evident truth. PS: Political Science & Politics 31 (1): 33–44.Google Scholar
  22. Ostrom, E. 2005. Understanding institutional diversity. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Ostrom, E. 2010. A long polycentric journey. Annual Review of Political Science 13: 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ostrom, V., and E. Ostrom. 1965. A behavioral approach to the study of intergovernmental relations. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 359: 137–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ostrom, V., and E. Ostrom. 1971. Public choice: A different approach to the study of public administration. Public Administration Review 31 (2): 203–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ostrom, V., and E. Ostrom. 1977. Public goods and public choices. In Alternatives for delivering public services. Toward improved performance, ed. E.S. Savas, 7–49. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  27. Ostrom, E., and R.B. Parks. 1973. Suburban police departments: Too many and too small? In The urbanization of the suburbs, ed. L.H. Masotti and J.K. Hadden, 367–402. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
  28. Ostrom, E., and R.B. Parks. 1999. Neither gargantua nor the land of lilliputs: Conjectures on mixed systems of metropolitan organization. In Polycentricity and local public economies: Readings from the workshop in political theory and policy analysis, ed. M.D. McGinnis, 284–305. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  29. Ostrom, E., and J. Walker, eds. 2003. Trust and reciprocity: Interdisciplinary lessons from experimental research. New York: Russell Sage Found.Google Scholar
  30. Ostrom, V., C.M. Tiebout, and R.L. Warren. 1961. The organization of government in metropolitan areas: A theoretical inquiry. American Political Science Review 55: 831–842.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ostrom, E., W. Baugh, R. Guarasci, R.B. Parks, and G.P. Whitaker. 1973. Community organization and the provision of police services. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
  32. Ostrom, E., R.B. Parks, and G.P. Whitaker. 1978a. Patterns of metropolitan policing. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.Google Scholar
  33. Ostrom, E., R.B. Parks, G.P. Whitaker, and S.L. Percy. 1978b. The public service production process: A framework for analyzing police services. Policy Studies Journal 7: 381–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ostrom, E., J. Walker, and R. Gardner. 1992. Covenants with and without a sword: Self-governance is possible. American Political Science Review 86 (2): 404–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ostrom, E., R. Gardner, and J. Walker. 1994. Rules, games, and common-pool resources. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Ostrom, E., M. Janssen, and J. Anderies. 2007. Going beyond panaceas. PNAS 104 (39): 15176–15178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Poteete, A., M. Janssen, and E. Ostrom. 2010. Working together: Collective action, the commons, and multiple methods in practice. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Romer, T., and H. Rosenthal. 1978. Political resource allocation, controlled agendas, and the status quo. Public Choice 33 (4): 27–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Schlager, E., and E. Ostrom. 1992. Property-rights regimes and natural resources: A conceptual analysis. Land Economics 68 (3): 249–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Schumpeter, J.A. 1942. Capitalism, socialism and democracy. New York: Harper Torchbooks.Google Scholar
  41. Stigler, G.J. 1962. The tenable range of functions of local government. In Private wants and public needs, ed. E.S. Phelps, 167–176. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  42. Tullock, G. 1970. Private wants, public means: An economic analysis of the desirable scope of government. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  43. Zimmerman, J.F. 1970. Metropolitan reform in the U.S.: An overview. Public Administration Review 30: 531–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paul Dragos Aligica
    • 1
  • Peter Boettke
    • 1
  1. 1.