Cost–benefit analysis (CBA) gives rise to a whole range of philosophical issues. The most discussed among these is the status of economic values that are assigned to assets conceived as incommensurable with money, such as a human life or the continued existence of an animal species. CBA also involves other contentious assumptions, for instance that a disadvantage affecting one person can be fully compensated for by an advantage affecting some other person. Another controversial issue is whether a CBA should cover all aspects in a decision or rather leave out certain issues (such as justice) so that they can instead be treated separately.
Aggregation Commensurability Comparability Compensation Contingent valuation Cost–benefit analysis Environmental economics Ethics Health economics Incommensurability Interpersonal comparison Life value Philosophy of economics Risk–benefit analysis Synopticism Value of life Welfare economics Willingness to pay
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Hansson, S.O. 2007. Philosophical problems in cost–benefit analysis. Economics and Philosophy 23: 163–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heinzerling, L. 2002. Markets for arsenic. Georgetown Law Journal 90: 2311–2339.Google Scholar
Hornstein, D.T. 1993. Lessons from federal pesticide regulation on the paradigms and politics of environmental law reform. Yale Journal on Regulation 10: 369–446.Google Scholar
Sen, A. 2000. The discipline of cost–benefit analysis. Journal of Legal Studies 29: 931–952.CrossRefGoogle Scholar