The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics

2018 Edition
| Editors: Macmillan Publishers Ltd

Economic Consequences of Weather, The

  • Jordan Rappaport
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_2909

Abstract

Households in the United States and a number of other wealthy nations have been migrating to places with nice weather. This likely reflects an increase in the relative valuation of the weather’s direct contribution to household utility. Several different amenity explanations are discussed that can account for the increased valuation and ongoing move.

Keywords

Compensating differentials Consumption amenities Local growth Migration Weather 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access

Notes

Acknowledgments

The views herein are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the position of the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City or the Federal Reserve System. Thank you to Yi Li for excellent research assistance.

Bibliography

  1. Barro, R.J., and X. Sala-I-Martin. 1991. Convergence across states and regions. Brooking Papers on Economic Activity 1: 107–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barro, R.J., and X. Sala-I-Martin. 1992. Convergence. Journal of Political Economy 100: 223–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barro, R., and X. Sala-I-Martin. 1995. Economic growth. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
  4. Blomquist, G.C., M.C. Berger, and J.P. Hoehn. 1988. New estimates of quality of life in urban areas. American Economic Review 78: 89–107.Google Scholar
  5. Caselli, F., and W.J. Coleman II. 2001. The U.S. structural transformation and regional convergence. Journal of Political Economy 109: 584–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chen, Y., and S.S. Rosenthal. 2008. Local amenities and life-cycle migration: Do people move for jobs or fun? Journal of Urban Economics 64: 519–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cheshire, P., and S. Magrini. 2006. Population growth in European cities: Weather matters – But only nationally. Regional Studies 40: 23–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Costa, D.L., and M.E. Kahn. 2003. The rising price of nonmarket goods. American Economic Review 93: 227–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gabriel, S.A., and S.S. Rosenthal. 2004. Quality of the business environment versus quality of life: Do firms and households like the same cities? Review of Economics and Statistics 86: 438–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Glaeser, E., and J. Gyourko. 2005. Urban decline and durable housing. Journal of Political Economy 113: 345–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Glaeser, E.L., and K. Tobio. 2008. The rise of the sunbelt. Southern Economic Journal 74: 610–643.Google Scholar
  12. Greenwood, M.J., G.L. Hunt, D.S. Rickman, and G.I. Treyz. 1991. Migration, regional equilibrium, and the estimation of compensating differentials. American Economic Review 81: 1382–1390.Google Scholar
  13. Gyourko, J., and J. Tracy. 1991. The structure of local public finance and the quality of life. Journal of Political Economy 99: 774–806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Haurin, D.R. 1980. The regional distribution of population, migration, and climate. Quarterly Journal of Economics 95: 293–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hirshleifer, D., and T. Shumway. 2003. Good day sunshine: Stock returns and the weather. Journal of Finance 58: 1009–1032.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kellner, T. 2004. Duh! Forbes 173: 50.Google Scholar
  17. Mueser, P.R., and P.E. Graves. 1995. Examining the role of economic opportunity and amenities in explaining population redistribution. Journal of Urban Economics 37: 176–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Oi, W.Y. 1997. The welfare implications of invention. In The economics of new goods, ed. T.F. Bresnahan and R.J. Gordon. Chicago: NBER/University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  19. Rappaport, J. 2004. Why are population flows so persistent? Journal of Urban Economics 56: 554–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Rappaport, J. 2007. Moving to nice weather. Regional Science and Urban Economics 37: 375–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Rappaport, J. 2008. Consumption amenities and city population density. Regional Science and Urban Economics 38: 533–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Rappaport, J. 2009. The increasing importance of quality of life. Journal of Economic Geography 9: 779–804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Roback, J. 1982. Wages, rents, and the quality of life. Journal of Political Economy 90: 1257–1278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Rosen, S. 1979. Wage-based indexes of urban quality of life. In Current issues in urban economics, ed. P. Miezkowski and M. Straszheim. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Saunders Jr., E.M. 1993. Stock prices and Wall Street weather. American Economic Review 83: 1337–1345.Google Scholar
  26. Stover, M.E., and C.L. Leven. 1992. Methodological issues in the determination of the quality of life in urban areas. Urban Studies 29: 737–754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jordan Rappaport
    • 1
  1. 1.