The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics

2018 Edition
| Editors: Macmillan Publishers Ltd

Infrastructure and Inequality

  • César Calderón
  • Luis Servén
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_2876

Abstract

An adequate supply of infrastructure services has long been considered essential for economic development by both academics and policymakers. This article reviews recent theoretical and empirical literature on the effects of infrastructure development on income distribution. The theoretical literature has employed a variety of analytical settings regarding the dynamics of income distribution, the extent of market distortions – notably in capital markets – and the externalities surrounding infrastructure services. In turn, the empirical literature has tested for the distributive effects of infrastructure development using multiple approaches, from cross-country aggregate data to micro-level studies of specific infrastructure interventions. However, these empirical tests face challenging issues of measurement, identification and heterogeneity. Overall, the empirical evidence suggests that infrastructure development may have a positive effect on distributive equity. Still, little is known about the likely magnitude of such an effect and the precise mechanisms through which it may accrue.

Keywords

Inequality Infrastructure Poverty Public investment 

JEL Classifications

D31 H54 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank Jon Temple for useful comments and suggestions. The views expressed here are ours only and do not necessarily reflect those of the World Bank, its Executive Directors, or the countries they represent.

Bibliography

  1. Aghion, P., and P. Bolton. 1992. Distribution and growth in models of imperfect capital markets. European Economic Review 36: 603–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aghion, P., and P. Bolton. 1997. A theory of trickle-down growth and development. Review of Economic Studies 64(2): 151–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alesina, A., R. Baqir, and W. Easterly. 1999. Public goods and ethnic divisions. Quarterly Journal of Economics 114(4): 1243–1284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Andrés, L. A., B. Briceño, C. Chase, and J. A. Echenique. 2014. Sanitation and externalities: Evidence from early childhood health in rural India. World bank policy research working paper 6737.Google Scholar
  5. Banerjee, A.V., and A.F. Newman. 1993. Occupational choice and the process of development. Journal of Political Economy 101(2): 274–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Benitez, D., O. Chisari, and A. Estache. 2003. Can the gains from Argentina’s utilities reform offset credit shocks? In Utility privatization and regulation: A fair deal for consumers? ed. C. Ugaz and C. Waddams Price. Northampton: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  7. Brenneman, A., and M. Kerf. 2002. Infrastructure and poverty linkages: A literature review (manuscript). Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
  8. Calderón, C., and A. Chong. 2004. Volume and quality of infrastructure and the distribution of income: An empirical investigation. Review of Income and Wealth 50: 87–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Calderón, C., and L. Servén. 2004. The effects of infrastructure development on growth and income distribution. World bank policy research working paper 3400.Google Scholar
  10. Calderón, C., and L. Servén. 2010a. Infrastructure and economic development in Sub-Saharan Africa. Journal of African Economies 19(S1): 13–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Calderón, C., and L. Servén. 2010b. Infrastructure in Latin America. In The oxford handbook of latin American economies, ed. J. Ocampo and J. Ros. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Capuno, J., C.A.R. Tan, and V.M. Fabella. 2011. Do piped water and flush toilets prevent child diarrhea in rural Philippines? Asia-Pacific Journal of Public Health 27: NP2122–NP2132. doi:10.1177/1010539511430996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chatterjee, S., and S.J. Turnovsky. 2012. Infrastructure and inequality. European Economic Review 56: 1730–1745.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chisari, O., A. Estache, and C. Romero. 1999. Winners and losers from privatization and regulation of utilities: Lessons from a general equilibrium model of Argentina. World Bank Economic Review 13(2): 357–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Devoto, F., E. Duflo, P. Dupas, W. Parienté, and V. Pons. 2011. Happiness on tap: Piped water adoption in urban Morocco (manuscript). Cambridge, MA: MIT.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dinkelman, T. 2011. The effects of rural electrification on employment: New evidence from South Africa. American Economic Review 101: 3078–3108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Duflo, E., and R. Pande. 2007. Dams. Quarterly Journal of Economics 122(2): 601–646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Escobal, J., and C. Ponce. 2008. Enhancing income opportunities for the rural poor: The benefits of rural roads. In Economic reform in developing countries: Reach, range, reason, ed. J.M. Fanelli and L. Squire, 307–336. New Delhi: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  19. Estache, A., A. Gomez-Lobo, and D. Leipziger. 2000. Utility privatization and the needs of the poor in Latin America: Have we learned enough to get it right? World bank policy research working paper 2407.Google Scholar
  20. Estache, A., V. Foster, and Q. Wodon. 2002. Accounting for poverty in infrastructure reform: Learning from Latin America’s experience, WBI development studies. Washington, DC: World Bank.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fan, S., and X. Zhang. 2004. Infrastructure and regional economic development in rural China. China Economic Review 15: 203–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ferreira, F. H. G. 1995. Roads to equality: wealth distribution dynamics with publicprivate capital complementarity. LSE-STICERD Discussion Paper TE/95/286 (London).Google Scholar
  23. Foster, V., J.P. Tre, and Q. Wodon. 2001. Energy prices, energy efficiency, and fuel poverty (manuscript). Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
  24. Galiani, S., P. Gertler, and E. Schargrodsky. 2005. Water for life: the impact of the privatization of water services on child mortality. Journal of Political Economy 113(1): 83–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Galor, O., and J. Zeira. 1993. Income distribution and macroeconomics. Review of Economic Studies 60: 35–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Getachew, Y.Y. 2010. Public capital and distributional dynamics in a two-sector growth model. Journal of Macroeconomics 32: 606–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hulten, C. 1996. Infrastructure capital and economic growth: How well you use it may be more important than how much you have. NBER working paper 5847.Google Scholar
  28. Jalan, J., and M. Ravallion. 2003. Does piped water reduce diarrhea for children in rural India? Journal of Econometrics 112: 153–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Khandker, S.R., and G.B. Koolwal. 2007. Are pro-growth policies pro-poor? Evidence from Bangladesh (manuscript). Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
  30. Khandker, S.R., and G.B. Koolwal. 2010. How infrastructure and financial institutions affect rural income and poverty: Evidence from Bangladesh. Journal of Development Studies 46(6): 1109–1137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Leipziger, D., M. Fay, and T. Yepes. 2003. The importance of infrastructure in meeting MDGs (manuscript). Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
  32. Lokshin, M., and R. Yemtsov. 2005. Has rural infrastructure rehabilitation in Georgia helped the poor? World Bank Economic Review 19(2): 311–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. López, H. 2004. Macroeconomics and inequality. World bank research workshop, macroeconomic challenges in low income countries.Google Scholar
  34. Majumder, R. 2012. Removing poverty and inequality in India: The role of infrastructure. MPRA paper no. 40941, Department of Economics, University of Burdwan.Google Scholar
  35. Mu, R., and D. van de Walle. 2007. Rural roads and local market development in Vietnam. World bank policy research working paper 4340.Google Scholar
  36. Navajas, F. H. 2000. El impacto distributivo de los cambios en los precios relativos en la Argentina entre 1988–1998 y los efectos de las privatizaciones y la desregulación económica. In: La Distribución del Ingreso en Argentina, ed. Fundación de Investigaciones Económicas Latinoamericanas. Buenos Aires.Google Scholar
  37. Pi, J., and Y. Zhou. 2012. Public infrastructure provision and skilled–unskilled wage inequality in developing countries. Labour Economics 19(6): 881–887.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Piketty, T. 1997. The dynamics of the wealth distribution and the interest rate with credit-rationing. Review of Economic Studies 64(2): 173–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Reardon, T., K. Stamoulis, and P. Pingali. 2007. Rural non-farm employment in developing countries in an era of globalization. Agricultural Economics 37(s1): 173–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Seneviratne, D., and Y. Sun. 2013. Infrastructure and income distribution in ASEAN 5: What are the links? IMF working paper 13/41.Google Scholar
  41. World Bank. 2003. Inequality in Latin America and the Caribbean: Breaking with history? World bank Latin America and the Caribbean studies. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
  42. Zhang, X., and S. Fan. 2004. Public investment and regional inequality in rural China. Agricultural Economics 30: 89–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Zhu, N., and X. Luo. 2006. Nonfarm activity and rural income inequality: A case study of two provinces in China, World bank research working paper no. 3811. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • César Calderón
    • 1
  • Luis Servén
    • 1
  1. 1.