Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Nursing Homes

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics

  • 41 Accesses

Abstract

Nursing homes are healthcare providers for persons, often elderly, who need assistance living with chronic illness. This article describes the main economic issues of supply and demand for nursing home care, including quality of care and long-term care insurance.

Nursing home care is an important area for health economics because it represents the largest share of long-term care expenditure. The potential for needing nursing home care affects economic decisions for individuals over a lifetime and across generations (Norton 2000). For example, an elderly widow anticipating a need for long-term care may decrease her savings or increase her bequests to qualify for means-tested public insurance, or may demand informal care from a working daughter, even though she ultimately never enters a nursing home.

Long-term care differs from acute medical care in four fundamental ways (Norton 2000). First, long-term care is care for chronic illness or disability instead of treatment of an acute illness. Medical expenses accumulate unrelentingly. Second, the nursing home industry is dominated by for-profit facilities sometimes facing excess demand, in contrast to the hospital industry which is dominated by non-profit facilities with an excess supply of beds. Third, nursing homes have many close substitutes, including informal care. Informal care may affect the caregiver’s labour supply or may influence bequests, if such bequests are used to elicit attention and informal caregiving by children. Fourth, in contrast to relatively comprehensive acute care insurance for elderly, few people purchase private long-term care insurance and most public insurance is means-tested, with high co-payments. Thus, long-term care is usually the greatest out-of-pocket expenditure risk faced by the elderly.

This article summarises the theoretical and empirical economic research on nursing homes and long-term care. In addition to discussing supply and demand, particular attention is focused on quality of care and the market for long-term care insurance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 6,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 8,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Arrow, K.J. 1963. Uncertainty and the welfare economics of medical care. American Economic Review 53(5): 941–973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernheim, B.D. 1991. How strong are bequest motives? Evidence based on estimates of the demand for life insurance and annuities. Journal of Political Economy 99(5): 899–927.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernheim, B.D., A. Shleifer, and L.H. Summers. 1985. The strategic bequest motive. Journal of Political Economy 93(6): 1045–1076.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, C.E. 1988. Competition in the market for nursing home care. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 13(2): 341–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J.R., and A. Finkelstein. 2007. Why is the market for long-term care insurance so small? Journal of Public Economics 91(10): 1967–1991.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J.R., and A. Finkelstein. 2011. Insuring long-term care in the United States. Journal of Economic Perspectives 25(4): 119–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carmichael, F., and S. Charles. 2003. The opportunity costs of informal care: Does gender matter? Journal of Health Economics 22(5): 781–803.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chou, S.Y. 2002. Asymmetric information, ownership and quality of care: An empirical analysis of nursing homes. Journal of Health Economics 21(2): 293–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cutler, D. M. 1996. Why Don’t Markets Insure Long-term Risk? Harvard mimeo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutler, D.M. 2001. Declining disability among the elderly. Health Affairs 20(6): 11–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dusansky, R. 1989. On the economics of institutional care of the elderly in the U.S.: The effects of change in government payment. Review of Economics 56: 141–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forder, J., and A. Netten. 2000. The price of placements in residential and nursing home care: The effects of contracts and competition. Health Economics 9(7): 643–657.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gertler, P.J. 1989. Subsidies, quality, and the regulation of nursing homes. Journal of Public Economics 38: 33–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gertler, P.J. 1992. Medicaid and the cost of improving access to nursing home care. Review of Economics and Statistics 74(2): 338–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grabowski, D.C. 2001a. Medicaid payment and the quality of nursing home care. Journal of Health Economics 20(4): 549–570.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grabowski, D.C. 2001b. Does an increase in the Medicaid payment rate improve nursing home quality? Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences 56B(2): S84–S93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grabowski, D.C. 2002. The economic implications of case-mix Medicaid reimbursement for nursing home care. Inquiry 39(3): 258–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grabowski, D.C. 2004. A longitudinal study of Medicaid payment, private-pay price and nursing home quality. International Journal of Health Care Finance and Economics 4(1): 5–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grabowski, D.C., and J.J. Angelelli. 2004. The relationship of Medicaid payment rates, bed constraint policies, and risk-adjusted pressure ulcers. Health Services Research 39(4): 793–812.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grabowski, D.C., and R.A. Hirth. 2003. Competitive spillovers across nonprofit and for-profit nursing homes. Journal of Health Economics 22(1): 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grabowski, D.C., and R.J. Town. 2011. Does information matter? Competition, quality, and the impact of nursing home report cards. Health Services Research 46(6): 1698–1719.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grabowski, D.C., R.L. Ohsfeldt, and M.A. Morrissey. 2003. The effects of CON repeal on Medicaid nursing home and long term care expenditures. Inquiry 40(2): 146–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grabowski, D.C., J.J. Angelelli, and V. Mor. 2004. Medicaid payment and risk adjusted nursing home quality measures. Health Affairs 23(5): 243–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gulley, O.D., and R.E. Santerre. 2003. The effect of public policies on nursing home care in the United States. Eastern Economic Journal 29(1): 93–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, V.H. 1993. The Medicare hospice benefit: the effectiveness of price incentives in health care policy. RAND Journal of Economics 24(4): 605–624.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Headen, A.E. Jr. 1992. Time costs and informal social support as determinants of differences between black and white families in the provision of long-term care. Inquiry 29: 440–450.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirth, R.A. 1999. Consumer information and competition between nonprofit and for-profit nursing homes. Journal of Health Economics 18(2): 219–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hubbard, R.G., J. Skinner, and S.P. Zeldes. 1995. Precautionary savings and social insurance. Journal of Political Economy 103: 360–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurd, M.D. 1987. Savings of the elderly and desired bequests. American Economic Review 77(3): 298–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurd, M.D. 1989. Mortality risk and bequests. Econometrica 57(4): 779–813.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Intrator, O., and V. Mor. 2004. Effect of state Medicaid payment rates on hospitalizations from nursing homes. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 52(3): 393–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Konetzka, R.T., D. Polsky, and R.M. Werner. 2013. Shipping out instead of shaping up: rehospitalization from nursing homes as an unintended effect of public reporting. Journal of Health Economics 32(2): 341–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laine, J., M. Linna, U. Hakkinen, and A. Noro. 2005. Measuring the productive efficiency and clinical quality of institutional long-term care for the elderly. Health Economics 14(3): 245–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lakdawalla, D., and T. Philipson. 2002. The rise in old-age longevity and the market for long-term care. American Economic Review 92(1): 295–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindeboom, M., F. Portrait, and G.J. van den Berg. 2002. An econometric analysis of the mental-health effects of major events in the life of older individuals. Health Economics 11(6): 505–520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manton, K.G., and X.L. Gu. 2001. Changes in the prevalence of chronic disability in the United States black and nonblack population above age 65 from 1982 to 1999. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 98(11): 6354–6359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noguchi, H., and S. Shimizutani. 2006. Do non-profit operators provide higher quality of care? Evidence from micro-level data for Japan’s long-term care industry. Hitotsubashi Journal of Economics 47(1): 125–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norton, E.C. 1992. Incentive regulation of nursing homes. Journal of Health Economics 11(2): 105–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norton, E.C. 1995. Elderly assets, Medicaid policy, and spend-down in nursing homes. Review of Income and Wealth 41(3): 309–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norton, E. C. 2000. Long-term care. In: Handbook of health economics, vol. IB (eds. A. J. Culyer and J. P. Newhouse), pp. 956–994. Elsevier Science, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norton, E.C., H. Wang, and S.C. Stearns. 2006. Behavioral implications of out-of-pocket health care expenditures. Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics 142(Special Issue): 3–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nyman, J.A. 1985. Prospective and cost-plus Medicaid payment, excess Medicaid demand, and the quality of nursing home care. Journal of Health Economics 4(3): 237–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nyman, J.A. 1988. Excess-demand, the percentage of Medicaid patients, and the quality of nursing home care. Journal of Human Resources 23(1): 76–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nyman, J.A. 1989. Excess demand, consumer rationality, and the quality of care in regulated nursing homes. Health Services Research 24(1): 105–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill, C., L. Groom, A.J. Avery, D. Boot, and K. Thornhill. 2000. Age and proximity to death as predictors of GP care costs: Results from a study of nursing home patients. Health Economics 9(8): 733–738.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pauly, M.V. 1990. The rational nonpurchase of long-term-care insurance. Journal of Political Economy 98(1): 153–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Portrait, F., M. Lindeboom, and D. Deeg. 2000. The use of long-term care services by the Dutch elderly. Health Economics 9(6): 513–531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scanlon, W.J. 1980. A theory of the nursing home market. Inquiry 17: 25–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spector, W.D., T.M. Selden, and J.W. Cohen. 1998. The impact of ownership type on nursing home outcomes. Health Economics 7(7): 639–653.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Houtven, C.H., and E.C. Norton. 2004. Informal care and health care use of older adults. Journal of Health Economics 23(6): 1159–1180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Houtven, C.H., and E.C. Norton. 2008. Informal care and Medicare expenditures: Testing for heterogeneous treatment effects. Journal of Health Economics 27(1): 134–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Werner, R.M., and D.A. Asch. 2005. The unintended consequences of publicly reporting quality information. Journal of the American Medical Association 293(10): 1239–1244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Werner, R.M., R.T. Konetzka, E.A. Stuart, E.C. Norton, D. Polsky, and J. Park. 2009. Impact of public reporting on quality of postacute care. Health Services Research 44(4): 1169–1187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Werner, R.M., E.C. Norton, R.T. Konetzka, and D. Polsky. 2012. Do consumers respond to publicly reported quality information? Evidence from nursing homes. Journal of Health Economics 31(1): 50–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White-Means, S.I. 1995. Conceptualizing race in economic models of medical utilization: A case study of community-based elders and the emergency room. Health Services Research 30(1): 207–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • White-Means, S.I. 1997. The continuing significance of race in meeting health care needs of black elderly. In Race, markets, and social outcomes, ed. P. Mason and R. Williams. Norwell: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. http://link.springer.com/referencework/10.1057/978-1-349-95121-5

    Edward C. Norton

Authors
  1. Edward C. Norton
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Copyright information

© 2018 Macmillan Publishers Ltd.

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Norton, E.C. (2018). Nursing Homes. In: The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_2858

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation