The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics

2018 Edition
| Editors: Macmillan Publishers Ltd

Classical Economics and Economic Growth

  • Gavin Cameron
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_2833

Abstract

The classical economists dealt with many of the issues now addressed by modern growth theories, albeit with different theoretical tools and with different perspectives. Classical analyses of the division of labour, population growth, and the difficulties when factors are in fixed supply, continue to have modern applications. However, the models they developed ran into difficulties after the ‘marginalist revolution’, when it became apparent that sustained technical change, abstinence and thrift by the labouring classes, and factor substitution might forestall the arrival of the stationary state.

Keywords

Balanced growth Capital accumulation Classical economics Classical economics and economic growth Diminishing returns Distribution theory Division of labour Economic growth Falling rate of profit Fertility Human capital Industrial Revolution Labour supply Luxury Malthus, T. R. Marginalist revolution Marx, K.H. Mill, J. S. Mortality Population growth Productive and unproductive labour Ricardo, D. Say, J.-B. Smith, A. Stationary state Technical change Value theory 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access

Notes

Acknowledgment

The author would like to thank Robert Allen, Julia Cartwright, Mary Dixon-Woods, Marcel Fafchamps, Nicholas Fawcett, Andrew Glyn, Mark Koyama, Silvia Palano, and Jonathan Temple for helpful comments on a preliminary draft.

Bibliography

  1. Aghion, P., and S. Durlauf. 2005. Handbook of economic growth. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
  2. Allen, R. 2001. The great divergence in European wages and prices from the Middle Ages to the First World War. Explorations in Economic History 38: 411–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bhaduri, A., and D. Harris. 1987. The complex dynamics of the simple Ricardian system. Quarterly Journal of Economics 102: 893–902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brewer, A. 1997. Luxury and economic development: David Hume and Adam Smith. Scottish Journal of Political Economy 45: 78–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brezis, E., and W. Young. 2003. The new views on demographic transition: A reassessment of Malthus’s and Marx’s approach to population. European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 10: 25–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Glyn, A. 2004. The corn model, gluts and surplus value. Working Paper No. 194, Department of Economics, Oxford University.Google Scholar
  7. Glyn, A. 2006. Will Marx be proved right? Oxonomics 1: 13–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Greenhalgh, C. 2005. Why does market capitalism fail to deliver a sustainable environment and greater equality of incomes? Cambridge Journal of Economics 29: 1091–1109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Harley, K. 2003. Growth theory and industrial revolutions in Britain and America. Canadian Journal of Economics 36: 809–831.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hollander, S. 1995. Collected essays I: Ricardo. The ‘new view’. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Jones, C. 2005. Growth and ideas. In Aghion and Durlauf (2005).Google Scholar
  12. Jonung, L. 1981. Ricardo on machinery and the present unemployment: An unpublished manuscript by Knut Wicksell. Economic Journal 91: 195–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kaldor, N. 1956. Alternatives theories of distribution. Review of Economic Studies 28: 83–100.Google Scholar
  14. Malthus, T.R. 1798/1999. An essay on the principle of population. Oxford: Oxford World’s Classics.Google Scholar
  15. Mill, J.S. 1848/1985. Principles of political economy, with some of their applications to social philosophy. London: Penguin Classics.Google Scholar
  16. Mokyr, J. 2005. Long-term economic growth and the history of technology. In Aghion and Durlauf (2005).Google Scholar
  17. Pasinetti, L. 1960. A mathematical formulation of the Ricardian system. Review of Economic Studies 27: 78–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Samuelson, P. 1978. The canonical classical model of political economy. Journal of Economic Literature 16: 1415–1434.Google Scholar
  19. Samuelson, P. 1988. Mathematical vindication of Ricardo on machinery. Journal of Political Economy 96: 274–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Smith, A. 1776/1976. An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations, ed. R.H. Campbell and A.S. Skinner, 2 vols. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Solow, R. 2005. Introduction: Growth in retrospect and prospect. In Aghion and Durlauf (2005).Google Scholar
  22. Sraffa, P. 1960. Production of commodities by means of commodities: Prelude to a critique of economic theory. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Stigler, G. 1958. Ricardo and the 93% labor theory of value. American Economic Review 48: 357–367.Google Scholar
  24. Sweezy, P. 1942. The theory of capitalist development. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gavin Cameron
    • 1
  1. 1.