Elites and Economic Outcomes
Reference work entry
First Online:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_2785
Abstract
Elites are a necessary part of economic activity. It therefore matters how elites are recruited and how they act. History is full of examples of elites that have acted well and also badly. Modern research has examined the training of elites, recruitment schemes and incentives for elites to discover how they can be used to promote, rather than impede, economic growth. The literature has also emphasized the effect of elite interconnection and elite recruitment on social mobility; it has shown that the standardization of elite education over the years may lead to uniformity and the creation of a transnational oligarchy.
Keywords
Circulation of elites Class Corruption Cultural capital Economic growth Education Elites and economic outcomes Globalization Human capital Inequality Iron law of oligarchy Meritocracy Power elite Social capital Social mobility Symbolic capital Technical changeJEL Classifications
N8 D3 Z13This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Bibliography
- Acemoglu, D., S. Johnson, and J.A. Robinson. 2001. The colonial origins of comparative development: An empirical investigation. American Economic Review 91: 1369–1401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Acemoglu, D., and J. Robinson. 2000. Political losers as a barrier to economic development. American Economic Review 90: 126–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Arrow, K., S. Bowles, and S. Durlauf. 2000. Meritocracy and economic inequality. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Bourdieu, P. 1977. Reproduction in education, society and culture. London: Sage.Google Scholar
- Bourguignon, F., and T. Verdier. 2000. Oligarchy, democracy, inequality and growth. Journal of Development Economics 62: 285–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Brezis, E.S., and F. Crouzet. 2004. Changes in the training of the power elites in Western Europe. Journal of European Economic History 33: 33–58.Google Scholar
- Brezis, E.S., and F. Crouzet. 2006. The role of higher education institutions: Recruitment of elites and economic growth. In Institutions and economic growth, ed. T. Eicher and C. Garcia-Penalosa. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Brezis, E.S., and P. Temin, eds. 1999. Elites, minorities, and economic growth. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
- Cassis, Y. 1997. Big business. The european experience in the twentieth century. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Crouzet, F. 1999. Business dynasties in Britain and France. In Elites, minorities, and economic growth, ed. E.S. Brezis and P. Temin. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
- Easterly, W. 2001. The middle class consensus and economic development. Journal of Economic Growth 6: 317–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Engerman, S.L., and K.L. Sokoloff. 1997. Factor endowments, institutions, and differential paths of growth among New World economies: A view from economic historians of the United States. In How latin America fell behind: Essays on the economic history of Brazil and Mexico, 1800–1914, ed. S. Haber. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
- Etzioni-Halevy, E. 1997. Classes and elites in democracy and democratization. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
- Foreman-Peck, J., and J. Smith. 2004. Business and social mobility into the British elite 1870–1914. Journal of European Economic History 55: 485–518.Google Scholar
- Friedman, W.A., and R.S. Tedlow. 2003. Statistical portraits of American business elites: A review essay. Business History 45: 89–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Gradstein, M. 2007. Inequality, democracy and the protection of property rights. Economic Journal 117: 252–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Higley, J., and M. Burton. 1989. The elite variable in democratic transitions and breakdowns. American Sociological Review 54: 17–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Justman, M., and M. Gradstein. 1999. Industrial Revolution, political transition and the subsequent decline in inequality in nineteenth-century Britain. Explorations in Economic History 36: 109–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lachmann, R. 2000. Capitalist in spite of themselves: Elite conflict and economic transition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Lengyel, G. 1999. Two waves of professionalization of the Hungarian economic elite. In Elites, minorities, and economic growth, ed. E.S. Brezis and P. Temin. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
- Michels, R. 1915. Political parties, 1959. New York: Dover.Google Scholar
- Mills, C.W. 1956. The power elite. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Mosca, G. 1939. The ruling class. New York: McGraw.Google Scholar
- Pakulski, J. 1999. Elites, ethnic mobilization and democracy in postcommunist Europe. In Elites, minorities, and economic growth, ed. E.S. Brezis and P. Temin. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
- Pareto, V. 1935. The mind and society. New York: Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar
- Perkin, H. 1978. The recruitment of elites in British society since 1800. Journal of Social History 12: 222–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Sokoloff, K., and S. Engerman. 2000. Institutions, factor endowment and paths of development in the New World. Journal of Economic Perspectives 14(3): 217–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Schumpeter, J.A. 1954. Capitalism, socialism and democracy. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Schumpeter, J.A. 1961. Theory of economic development. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Temin, P. 1999a. The American business elite in historical perspective. In Elites, minorities, and economic growth, ed. E.S. Brezis and P. Temin. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
- Temin, P. 1999b. The stability of the American business elite. Industrial and Corporate Change 8: 189–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Young, M. 1958. The rise of meritocracy, 1870–2033. London: Thames & Hudson.Google Scholar
Copyright information
© Macmillan Publishers Ltd. 2018