Skip to main content

Lucas Critique

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics
  • 50 Accesses

Abstract

The ‘Lucas critique’ is a criticism of econometric policy evaluation procedures that fail to recognize that optimal decision rules of economic agents vary systematically with changes in policy. In particular, it criticizes using estimated statistical relationships from past data to forecast the effects of adopting a new policy, because the estimated regression coefficients are not invariant but will change along with agents’ decision rules in response to a new policy. A classic example of this fallacy was the erroneous inference that a regression of inflation on unemployment (the Phillips curve) represented a structural trade-off for policy to exploit.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 6,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 8,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Friedman, M. 1968. The role of monetary policy. American Economic Review 58: 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ljungqvist, L., and T.J. Sargent. 2004. Recursive macroeconomic theory. 2nd ed. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, R.E. Jr. 1972. Expectations and the neutrality of money. Journal of Economic Theory 4: 103–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, R.E., Jr. 1976. Econometric policy evaluation: A critique. In The phillips curve and the labor market, ed. K. Brunner and A. Meltzer, Vol. 1 of Carnegie-Rochester conference on public policy. Amsterdam, North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, R.E. Jr., and T.J. Sargent. 1981. Rational expectations and econometric practice. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phelps, E.S. 1968. Money wage dynamics and labor market equilibrium. Journal of Political Economy 76: 687–711.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, A.W. 1958. The relation between unemployment and the rate of change of money wage rates in the United Kingdom, 1861–1957. Econometrica 25: 283–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences 1995. The Sveriges Riksbank prize in economic sciences in memory of Alfred Nobel for 1995. Press release, 10 October. Online. Available at http://nobelprize.org/economics/laureates/1995/press.html. Accessed 4 Oct 2006.

  • Samuelson, P.A., and R.M. Solow. 1960. Analytical aspects of anti-inflation policy. American Economic Review 50: 177–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sargent, T.J. 1984. Autoregressions, expectations, and advice. American Economic Review 74: 408–415.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sargent, T.J., and N. Wallace. 1976. Rational expectations and the theory of economic policy. Journal of Monetary Economics 2: 169–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Copyright information

© 2018 Macmillan Publishers Ltd.

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Ljungqvist, L. (2018). Lucas Critique. In: The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_2784

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics