Skip to main content

Polarization

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics
  • 29 Accesses

Abstract

Polarization means the tendency of economic agents to form different groups and acquire identities that enhance differences from other groups. It is both cause and consequence of much economic behaviour. It has been employed, for example, in describing the diminution of the middle class in wage, income and wealth distributions, in studying growth and convergence issues, and in examining the plight of the poor. Although polarization is closely associated with trends in inequality, increased polarization can correspond to an increase, a reduction or no change in inequality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 6,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 8,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Akerlof, G. 1997. Social distance and social decision. Econometrica 65: 1005–1027.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, G. 1996. Nonparametric tests for stochastic dominance in income distributions. Econometrica 64: 1183–1193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, G. 2004a. Making inferences about the polarization, welfare and poverty of nations: A study of 101 countries 1970–1995. Journal of Applied Econometrics 19: 537–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, G. 2004b. Toward an empirical analysis of polarization. Journal of Econometrics 122: 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, G. 2004c. The empirical assessment of multidimensional inequality: Sample weighted multivariate generalizations of the Gini Coefficient and Kolmogorov-Smirnov two sample tests for stochastic dominance. Mimeo: Department of Economics, University of Toronto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, G. 2005. Indices and tests for alienation based upon Gini type and distributional overlap measures. Mimeo: Department of Economics, University of Toronto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, G., and Y. Ge. 2004. A new approach to convergence, city types and the ‘true’ convergence of post-reform Chinese urban income distributions. Mimeo: Department of Economics, University of Toronto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, G., and S. Donald. 2003. Consistent tests for stochastic dominance. Econometrica 71: 71–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barro, R. 1998. Determinants of economic growth: A cross country empirical study. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beach, C., R. Chaykowski, and G. Slotsve. 1998. Inequality and polarization of male earnings in the US 1968–1992. North American Journal of Economics and Finance 8: 135–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beach, C., and G. Slotsve. 1996. Are we becoming two societies? income, polarization and the middle class in Canada. Toronto: C.D. Howe Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernard, A., and S. Durlauf. 1996. Interpreting tests of the convergence hypothesis. Journal of Econometrics 71: 161–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bossert, W., C. D’Ambrosio, and V. Peragrine. 2004. Deprivation and social exclusion. Paper presented at the International Association for Research in Income and Wealth. Ireland, August: Cork.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corak, M. 2004. Generational income mobility in north America and Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • D’Ambrosio, C., and E. Wolff. 2001. Is wealth becoming more polarized in the United States? Working paper 330. New York: Levy Economics Institute, Bard College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, R., and J.-Y. Duclos. 2000. Statistical inference for stochastic dominance and for the measurement of poverty and inequality. Econometrica 68: 1435–1464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dinardo, J., and T. Lemieux. 1997. Diverging male wage inequality in the United States and Canada 1981–1988: Do institutions explain the difference? Industrial and Labour Relations Review 50: 629–651.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobkins, L., and Y. Ioannides. 2000. Dynamic evolution of the U.S. city size distribution. In Economics of cities, ed. J.M. Huriot and J.F. Thisse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duclos, J.-Y., J. Esteban, and D. Ray. 2004. Polarization: concepts, measurement, estimation. Econometrica 72: 1737–1773.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durlauf, S., and D.T. Quah. 1999. The new empirics of economic growth. In Handbook of macroeconomics, ed. J.B. Taylor and M. Woodford, vol. 1A. Amsterdam: North Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esteban, J.-M., and D. Ray. 1994. On the measurement of polarization. Econometrica 62: 819–851.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foster, J., J. Greer, and E. Thorbecke. 1984. A class of decomposable poverty measures. Econometrica 52: 761–766.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foster, J., and M. Wolfson. 1992. Polarization and the decline of the middle class: Canada and the US Mimeo. Nashville: Vanderbilt University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Good, I., and R. Gaskins. 1980. Density estimation and bump-hunting by the penalised likelihood method exemplified by scattering and meteorite data. Journal of the American Statistical Association 75: 42–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartigan, J., and P. Hartigan. 1985. The dip test of unimodality. Annals of Statistics 13: 70–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, S. 1996. Recent trends in the U.K. income distribution: What happened and why? Oxford Review of Economic Policy 12: 29–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, C. 1997. On the evolution of the world income distribution. Journal of Economic Perspectives 11(3): 19–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keefer, P., and S. Knack. 2002. Polarization, politics and property rights: Links between inequality and growth. Public Choice 111: 127–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koshevoy, G., and K. Mosler. 1997. Multivariate Gini indices. Journal of Multivariate Analysis 60: 252–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levy, F., and R. Murnane. 1992. US earnings inequality: A review of recent trends and proposed explanations. Journal of Economic Literature 30: 1333–1381.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linton, O., Maasoumi, E. and Whang, Y.-J.2002. Consistent testing for stochastic dominance: A subsampling approach. Discussion Paper No.EM/02/433.STICERD, London School of Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • McFadden, D. 1989. In Testing for stochastic dominance in studies in the economics of uncertainty (in honor of Josef Hadar), ed. T. Fomby and T. Seo. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quah, D. 1997. Empirics for growth and distribution: stratification, polarization, and convergence clubs. Journal of Economic Growth 2: 27–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y.Q., and K.Y. Tsui. 2000. Polarization orderings and new classes of polarization indices. Journal of Public Economic Theory 2: 349–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfson, M. 1994. When inequalities diverge. American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings 84: 353–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfson, M. 1997. Divergent inequalities: Theory and empirical results. Review of Income and Wealth 43: 401–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yitzhaki, S. 1994. Economic distance and overlapping of distributions. Journal of Econometrics 61: 147–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Copyright information

© 2018 Macmillan Publishers Ltd.

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Anderson, G. (2018). Polarization. In: The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_2781

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics