Abstract
Polarization means the tendency of economic agents to form different groups and acquire identities that enhance differences from other groups. It is both cause and consequence of much economic behaviour. It has been employed, for example, in describing the diminution of the middle class in wage, income and wealth distributions, in studying growth and convergence issues, and in examining the plight of the poor. Although polarization is closely associated with trends in inequality, increased polarization can correspond to an increase, a reduction or no change in inequality.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Bibliography
Akerlof, G. 1997. Social distance and social decision. Econometrica 65: 1005–1027.
Anderson, G. 1996. Nonparametric tests for stochastic dominance in income distributions. Econometrica 64: 1183–1193.
Anderson, G. 2004a. Making inferences about the polarization, welfare and poverty of nations: A study of 101 countries 1970–1995. Journal of Applied Econometrics 19: 537–550.
Anderson, G. 2004b. Toward an empirical analysis of polarization. Journal of Econometrics 122: 1–26.
Anderson, G. 2004c. The empirical assessment of multidimensional inequality: Sample weighted multivariate generalizations of the Gini Coefficient and Kolmogorov-Smirnov two sample tests for stochastic dominance. Mimeo: Department of Economics, University of Toronto.
Anderson, G. 2005. Indices and tests for alienation based upon Gini type and distributional overlap measures. Mimeo: Department of Economics, University of Toronto.
Anderson, G., and Y. Ge. 2004. A new approach to convergence, city types and the ‘true’ convergence of post-reform Chinese urban income distributions. Mimeo: Department of Economics, University of Toronto.
Barrett, G., and S. Donald. 2003. Consistent tests for stochastic dominance. Econometrica 71: 71–104.
Barro, R. 1998. Determinants of economic growth: A cross country empirical study. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Beach, C., R. Chaykowski, and G. Slotsve. 1998. Inequality and polarization of male earnings in the US 1968–1992. North American Journal of Economics and Finance 8: 135–151.
Beach, C., and G. Slotsve. 1996. Are we becoming two societies? income, polarization and the middle class in Canada. Toronto: C.D. Howe Institute.
Bernard, A., and S. Durlauf. 1996. Interpreting tests of the convergence hypothesis. Journal of Econometrics 71: 161–174.
Bossert, W., C. D’Ambrosio, and V. Peragrine. 2004. Deprivation and social exclusion. Paper presented at the International Association for Research in Income and Wealth. Ireland, August: Cork.
Corak, M. 2004. Generational income mobility in north America and Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
D’Ambrosio, C., and E. Wolff. 2001. Is wealth becoming more polarized in the United States? Working paper 330. New York: Levy Economics Institute, Bard College.
Davidson, R., and J.-Y. Duclos. 2000. Statistical inference for stochastic dominance and for the measurement of poverty and inequality. Econometrica 68: 1435–1464.
Dinardo, J., and T. Lemieux. 1997. Diverging male wage inequality in the United States and Canada 1981–1988: Do institutions explain the difference? Industrial and Labour Relations Review 50: 629–651.
Dobkins, L., and Y. Ioannides. 2000. Dynamic evolution of the U.S. city size distribution. In Economics of cities, ed. J.M. Huriot and J.F. Thisse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Duclos, J.-Y., J. Esteban, and D. Ray. 2004. Polarization: concepts, measurement, estimation. Econometrica 72: 1737–1773.
Durlauf, S., and D.T. Quah. 1999. The new empirics of economic growth. In Handbook of macroeconomics, ed. J.B. Taylor and M. Woodford, vol. 1A. Amsterdam: North Holland.
Esteban, J.-M., and D. Ray. 1994. On the measurement of polarization. Econometrica 62: 819–851.
Foster, J., J. Greer, and E. Thorbecke. 1984. A class of decomposable poverty measures. Econometrica 52: 761–766.
Foster, J., and M. Wolfson. 1992. Polarization and the decline of the middle class: Canada and the US Mimeo. Nashville: Vanderbilt University.
Good, I., and R. Gaskins. 1980. Density estimation and bump-hunting by the penalised likelihood method exemplified by scattering and meteorite data. Journal of the American Statistical Association 75: 42–56.
Hartigan, J., and P. Hartigan. 1985. The dip test of unimodality. Annals of Statistics 13: 70–84.
Jenkins, S. 1996. Recent trends in the U.K. income distribution: What happened and why? Oxford Review of Economic Policy 12: 29–46.
Jones, C. 1997. On the evolution of the world income distribution. Journal of Economic Perspectives 11(3): 19–36.
Keefer, P., and S. Knack. 2002. Polarization, politics and property rights: Links between inequality and growth. Public Choice 111: 127–154.
Koshevoy, G., and K. Mosler. 1997. Multivariate Gini indices. Journal of Multivariate Analysis 60: 252–276.
Levy, F., and R. Murnane. 1992. US earnings inequality: A review of recent trends and proposed explanations. Journal of Economic Literature 30: 1333–1381.
Linton, O., Maasoumi, E. and Whang, Y.-J.2002. Consistent testing for stochastic dominance: A subsampling approach. Discussion Paper No.EM/02/433.STICERD, London School of Economics.
McFadden, D. 1989. In Testing for stochastic dominance in studies in the economics of uncertainty (in honor of Josef Hadar), ed. T. Fomby and T. Seo. New York: Springer.
Quah, D. 1997. Empirics for growth and distribution: stratification, polarization, and convergence clubs. Journal of Economic Growth 2: 27–59.
Wang, Y.Q., and K.Y. Tsui. 2000. Polarization orderings and new classes of polarization indices. Journal of Public Economic Theory 2: 349–363.
Wolfson, M. 1994. When inequalities diverge. American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings 84: 353–358.
Wolfson, M. 1997. Divergent inequalities: Theory and empirical results. Review of Income and Wealth 43: 401–421.
Yitzhaki, S. 1994. Economic distance and overlapping of distributions. Journal of Econometrics 61: 147–159.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Copyright information
© 2018 Macmillan Publishers Ltd.
About this entry
Cite this entry
Anderson, G. (2018). Polarization. In: The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_2781
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_2781
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-95188-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-95189-5
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences