Superstars, Economics of
Gigantic incomes and rare talents attract attention and elicit a search for an explanation. Sherwin Rosen has provided us with an elegant neoclassical model whose market equilibrium is characterized by a superstar. Given a fixed cost of consumption, customers flock to talented sellers. If there are no costs of production, the most talented seller becomes a superstar. Discrete gaps in the talent distribution allow less talented sellers to survive but they must charge lower prices. A competitive market equilibrium thus exhibits a skewed distribution of earnings and outputs.
KeywordsMarshall, A. Motion pictures, economics of Rosen, Sherwin Simon, H. Superstars, economics of Yule distribution
- Adler, M. 1985. Stardom and talent. American Economic Review 75: 208–212.Google Scholar
- Beckmann, M. 1987. Rank. In The new palgrave: A dictionary of economics, vol. 4, ed. J. Eatwell, M. Milgate and P. Newman. Basingstoke: Macmillan.Google Scholar
- Borghans, L., and L. Groot. 1998. Superstardom and monopolistic power: Why media stars earn their marginal contribution to welfare. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 154: 546–571.Google Scholar
- Marshall, A. 1920. Principles of economics. 8th ed, 1952. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
- McConnell, C., and S. Brue. 2005. Economics, principles, problems, and policies. 16th ed. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
- Rosen, S. 1981. The economics of superstars. American Economic Review 71: 845–858.Google Scholar
- Rosen, S. 1983. The economics of superstars: Reply. American Economic Review 73: 460–462.Google Scholar
- The Baseball Archive. Online. Available at http://www.baseball1.com/bb-data/bbd-mas.html. Accessed 29 Dec 2005.
- Yule, G. 1924. A mathematical theory of evolution, based on the conclusion of Dr. J.C. Willis, F.R.S. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B 213, 21–87.Google Scholar