The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics

2018 Edition
| Editors: Macmillan Publishers Ltd

Euro

  • Adam S. Posen
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_2724

Abstract

The euro has been a limited success at home, but it has not challenged the dollar as a global reserve currency. This reflects the limited impact of the euro on member economies. While European financial markets and trade are far more integrated than before adoption of the euro, that is the result of broader international trends. Factors inhibiting growth in the eurozone’s real economy prevent truly deep financial integration as well, despite the removal of currency risk. The euro has delivered price stability and credible monetary policy, but not induced the convergence and reform necessary to improve European economic performance.

Keywords

Currency unions Euro European Central Bank European Monetary Union Eurozone Exchange Rate Mechanism (EU) Exchange rate uncertainty Financial market integration Inflation Inflationary expectations International capital flows Money market integration Portfolio investment Stability and Growth Pact (EU) 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access

Bibliography

  1. Arestis, P., and M. Sawyer. 2001. Will the euro bring economic crisis to Europe? Economics working paper archive: Washington University in St Louis.Google Scholar
  2. Baldwin, R. 2005. The euro’s trade effects. Presented at the ECB workshop: What effects is EMU having on the euro area and its member countries? Presented at the European Central Bank workshop. Frankfurt, 16 June.Google Scholar
  3. Bergsten, F.C. 1997. The impact of the euro on exchange rates and international policy cooperation. In EMU and the international monetary system, ed. M. Paul, T.H. Krueger, and B. Turtelboom. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.Google Scholar
  4. Bradford, S., and R.Z. Lawrence. 2004. Has globalization gone far enough? The costs of fragmented international markets. Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.Google Scholar
  5. Canzoneri, M.B., V. Grilli, and P. Masson. 1992. Establishing a Central Bank for Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Cato Journal. 2004. The future of the euro, vol. 24 (Special Issue). Washington, DC: Cato Institute.Google Scholar
  7. Cecchini, P. 1988. Research on theCost of Non-Europe’: Basic findings (Cecchini report). Luxembourg: EUR-OP.Google Scholar
  8. Chinn, M.D., and J.A. Frankel. 2004. The euro area and world interest rates. Working paper series 1016. Center for International Economics, UC Santa Cruz.Google Scholar
  9. Chinn, M.D., and J.A. Frankel. 2007. Will the euro eventually surpass the dollar as leading international reserve currency? In G7 current account imbalances: Sustainability and adjustment, ed. R. Clarida. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  10. Currie, D., P. Levine, and J. Pearlman. 1992. European monetary union or hard EMS? European Economic Review 36: 1185–1204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. De Cecco, M., and A. Giovannini. 1989. A European Central Bank? Perspectives on monetary unification after ten years of the EMS. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. De Grauwe, P. 1996. Monetary union and convergence economics. European Economic Review 40: 1091–1101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. De Grauwe, P. 2000. Economics of monetary union. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Dornbusch, R. 1989. The dollar in the 1990s: Competitiveness and the challenges of new economic blocs. In Monetary policy in the 1990s: A symposium, sponsored by the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, Jackson Hole, WY.Google Scholar
  15. Eichengreen, B. 1999. Will EMU work? In Euroen og den norske kronens skjebne, ed. A.J. Isachsen and O.B. Roste. Bergen: Fagbokforlaget. English version online. Available at http://emlab.berkeley.edu/users/eichengr/policy/merrill.pdf, accessed 25 February 2007.
  16. Emerson, M., D. Gros, and A. Italianer. 1992. One market, one money: An evaluation of the potential benefits and costs of forming an economic and monetary union. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  17. European Commission. 1990. One market, one money. European Economy 44.Google Scholar
  18. European Commission. 1996. Economic evaluation of the internal market. European economy: Reports and studies no. 4. Brussels.Google Scholar
  19. European Commission. 1997. External aspects of economic and monetary union. Euro papers No. 1. Brussels.Google Scholar
  20. Feldstein, M. 1997. The political economy of the European economic and monetary union: Political sources of an economic liability. Journal of Economic Perspectives 11(4): 23–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Forbes, K. 2005. The euro and financial markets. In Posen (2005a).Google Scholar
  22. Giavazzi, F., and L. Spaventa. 1990. The ‘new’ EMS. Discussion paper No. 369, CEPR.Google Scholar
  23. Lane, P., and S. Wälti. 2006. The euro and financial integration. Discussion paper. Dublin: Institute for International Integration Studies.Google Scholar
  24. Mann, C.L., and E.E. Meade. 2002. Home bias, transaction costs and prospects for the euro: A more detailed analysis. Working paper. Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.Google Scholar
  25. McCauley, R.N., and W.R. White. 1997. The euro and European financial markets. Working paper No. 41. Basle: BIS.Google Scholar
  26. Mundell, R. 1998. What the euro means for the dollar and the international monetary system. Atlantic Economic Journal 26: 227–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Obstfeld, M., and K. Rogoff. 2004. The unsustainable US current account position revisited. Working paper No. 10869. Cambridge, MA: NBER.Google Scholar
  28. Portes, R., and G. Alogoskoufis. 1991. International costs and benefits from EMU. In The economics of EMU. European Economy 1 (Special Issue), 231–245.Google Scholar
  29. Posen, A.S. 1998. Why EMU is irrelevant for the German economy. Working paper No. 1998/11, Center for Financial Studies, University of Frankfurt.Google Scholar
  30. Posen, A.S. (ed.). 2005a. The euro at five: Ready for a global role? Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.Google Scholar
  31. Posen, A.S. 2005b. Can Rubinomics work in the eurozone? In Posen (2005a).Google Scholar
  32. Quarles, R. 2005. Discussion of the euro and the dollar. In Posen (2005a).Google Scholar
  33. Rey, H. 2005. The euro and financial markets. In Posen (2005a).Google Scholar
  34. Rogers, J.H. 2003. Monetary union, price level convergence, and inflation: How close is Europe to the United States? International Finance discussion papers No. 740. Washington, DC: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.Google Scholar
  35. Summers, L.H. 2004. The United States and the global adjustment process. Third Annual Stavros S. Niarchos Lecture. Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics. Online. Available at https://piie.com/commentary/speeches-papers/united-states-and-global-adjustment-process ResearchID = 200. Accessed 25 Feb 2007.
  36. Walters, A. 1990. Monetary constitutions for Europe. Speech at the 28th meeting of the Mont Pèlerin Society, Munich.Google Scholar
  37. Weber, A.A. 1991. EMU and asymmetries and adjustment problems in the EMS: Some empirical evidence. European Economy 44: 187–207.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Adam S. Posen
    • 1
  1. 1.