The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics

2018 Edition
| Editors: Macmillan Publishers Ltd

Pluralism in Economics

  • Sheila C. Dow
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_2711

Abstract

This article explores the meaning of pluralism in economics and the arguments put forward in support of it. In particular, the distinction is drawn between methodological pluralism (support for variety in methodological approach) and a pluralist methodology (one which employs a variety of methods). Methodological pluralism usually takes the form of arguing that it is in the nature of knowledge about social systems that there will be variety of methodological approaches. But prescriptive arguments for a particular pluralist methodology may accompany the argument that this is the single best methodology (methodological monism).

Keywords

Critical realism Methodological pluralism Monism Open systems Paradigms Pluralism in economics Pluralist methodology Positivism Postmodernism Rhetoric 

JEL Classification

B4 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Bibliography

  1. Caldwell, B.J. 1982. Beyond positivism. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  2. Caldwell, B.J. 1989. Post-Keynesian methodology: An assessment. Review of Political Economy 1: 43–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Caldwell, B.J. 1997. Comment. In Salanti and Screpanti (1997).Google Scholar
  4. Chick, V., and S.C. Dow. 2005. The meaning of open systems. Journal of Economic Methodology 12: 363–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Colander, D. 2000. New millennium economics: How did it get this way, and what way is it? Journal of Economic Perspectives 14(1): 121–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Davis, J.B. 1999. Postmodernism and identity conditions for discourses. In What do economists know? New economics of knowledge, ed. R.F. Garnett Jr.. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Dow, S.C. 2004. Structured pluralism. Journal of Economic Methodology 11: 275–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Goodwin, C. 2000. Comment: It’s the homogeneity, stupid! Journal of the History of Economic Thought 22: 179–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hodgson, G.M. 1997. Metaphor and pluralism in economics: Mechanics and biology. Pluralism in economics. In Salanto and Screpanti (1997).Google Scholar
  10. Keynes, J.M. 1921. A treatise on probability. Collected writings, vol. 3. London: Macmillan for the Royal Economic Society, 1973.Google Scholar
  11. Kuhn, T.S. 1962. The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  12. Lawson, T. 1997. Economics and reality. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lawson, T. 2003. Reorienting economics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Mäki, U. 1997. The one world and the many theories. Pluralism in Economics. In Salanti and Screpanti (1997).Google Scholar
  15. McCloskey, D.N. 1983. The rhetoric of economics. Journal of Economic Literature 21: 434–461.Google Scholar
  16. McCloskey, D.N. 1996. The vices of economists: The virtues of the Bourgeoisie. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Salanti, A., and E. Screpanti (eds.). 1997. Pluralism in economics. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  18. Samuels, W. J. 1997. The case for methodological pluralism. In Salanti and Screpanti (1997).Google Scholar
  19. Screpanti, E. 1997. Afterword: Can methodological pluralism be a methodological canon? In Salanti and Screpanti (1997).Google Scholar
  20. Weintraub, E.R. 1989. Methodology doesn’t matter, but the history of thought might. Scandinavian Journal of Economics 91: 477–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sheila C. Dow
    • 1
  1. 1.