Skip to main content

Threshold Models

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics
  • 13 Accesses

Abstract

This article contains a short account of threshold, smooth transition and Markov switching autoregressive models. Neural network models are highlighted as well. Linearity testing, parameter estimation and, more generally, modelling are considered. Forecasting with threshold models receives attention. Suggestions for further reading are supplied.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 6,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 8,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Andrews, D.W.K., and W. Ploberger. 1994. Optimal tests when a nuisance parameter is present only under the alternative. Econometrica 62: 1383–1414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauwens, L., M. Lubrano, and J.-F. Richard. 2000. Bayesian inference in dynamic econometric models. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bierens, H.J. 1990. A consistent conditional moment test of functional form. Econometrica 58: 1443–1458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Box, G.E.P., and G.M. Jenkins. 1970. Time series analysis, forecasting and control. San Francisco: Holden-Day.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brock, W.A., and S.M. Potter. 1993. Nonlinear time series and macroeconometrics. In Handbook of statistics, vol. 11, ed. G.S. Maddala, C.R. Rao, and H.D. Vinod. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cappé, O., E. Moulines, and T. Rydén. 2005. Inference in Hidden Markov models. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cybenko, G. 1989. Approximation by superposition of sigmoidal functions. Mathematics of Control, Signals, and Systems 2: 303–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, R.B. 1977. Hypothesis testing when a nuisance parameter is present only under the alternative. Biometrika 64: 247–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fine, T.L. 1999. Feedforward neural network methodology. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franses, P.H., and D. van Dijk. 2000. Non-linear time series models in empirical finance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Funahashi, K. 1989. On the approximate realization of continuous mappings by neural networks. Neural Networks 2: 183–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia, R. 1998. Asymptotic null distribution of the likelihood ratio test in Markov switching models. International Economic Review 39: 763–788.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granger, C.W.J., and T. Teräsvirta. 1993. Modelling nonlinear economic relationships. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guégan, D. 1994. Séries chronologiques non linéaires à temps discret. Paris: Economica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, J.D. 1993. Estimation, inference and forecasting of time series subject to changes in regime. In Handbook of statistics, vol. 11, ed. G.S. Maddala, C.R. Rao, and H.R. Vinod. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, J.D. 1994. Time series analysis. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, B.E. 1996. Inference when a nuisance parameter is not identified under the null hypothesis. Econometrica 64: 413–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, B.E. 1999. Testing for linearity. Journal of Economic Surveys 13: 551–576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haykin, S. 1999. Neural networks. A comprehensive foundation, 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hornik, K., M. Stinchcombe, and H. White. 1989. Multi-layer feedforward networks are universal approximators. Neural Networks 2: 359–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindgren, G. 1978. Markov regime models for mixed distributions and switching regressions. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics 5: 81–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luukkonen, R., P. Saikkonen, and T. Teräsvirta. 1988. Testing linearity against smooth transition autoregressive models. Biometrika 75: 491–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marcellino, M. 2004. Forecasting EMU macroeconomic variables. International Journal of Forecasting 20: 359–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Medeiros, M.C., T. Teräsvirta, and G. Rech. 2006. Building neural network models for time series: A statistical approach. Journal of Forecasting 25: 49–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramsey, J.B. 1969. Tests for specification errors in classical least-squares regression analysis. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 31: 350–371.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stinchcombe, M.B., and H. White. 1998. Consistent specification testing with nuisance parameters present only under the alternative. Econometric Theory 14: 295–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stock, J.H., and M.W. Watson. 1999. A comparison of linear and nonlinear univariate models for forecasting macroeconomic time series. In Cointegration, causality and forecasting: A Festschrift in honour of Clive W. J. Granger, ed. R.F. Engle and H. White. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teräsvirta, T. 1998. Modeling economic relationships with smooth transition regressions. In Handbook of applied economic statistics, ed. A. Ullah and D.E. Giles. New York: Dekker.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teräsvirta, T. 2004. Smooth transition regression modeling. In Applied time series econometrics, ed. H. Lütkepohl and M. Krätzig. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teräsvirta, T. 2006a. Forecasting economic variables with nonlinear models. In Handbook of economic forecasting, vol. 1, ed. G. Elliott, C.W.J. Granger, and A. Timmermann. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teräsvirta, T. 2006b. Univariate nonlinear time series. In Palgrave handbook of econometrics: volume 1, econometric theory, ed. T.C. Mills and K. Patterson. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teräsvirta, T., D. van Dijk, and M.C. Medeiros. 2005. Smooth transition autoregressions, neural networks, and linear models in forecasting macroeconomic time series: A re-examination. International Journal of Forecasting 21: 755–774.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tong, H. 1990. Non-linear time series: A dynamical system approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsay, R.S. 1989. Testing and modeling threshold autoregressive processes. Journal of the American Statistical Association 84: 231–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsay, R.S. 1998. Testing and modeling multivariate threshold models. Journal of the American Statistical Association 93: 1188–1202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsay, R.S. 2002. Analysis of financial time series. New York: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • van Dijk, D., T. Teräsvirta, and P.H. Franses. 2002. Smooth transition autoregressive models – A survey of recent developments. Econometric Reviews 21: 1–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, H. 2006. Approximate nonlinear forecasting methods. In Handbook of economic forecasting, ed. G. Elliott, C.W.J. Granger, and A. Timmermann. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Copyright information

© 2018 Macmillan Publishers Ltd.

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Teräsvirta, T. (2018). Threshold Models. In: The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_2704

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics