Skip to main content

Labour Discipline

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
  • 27 Accesses

Abstract

Although economists in different fields, or from different schools, use different words to describe the phenomenon, there is widespread agreement that workers can, and sometimes do, ‘contest’ the sale of their labour power to employers. The question of how employers maintain ‘labour discipline’ in such an environment has intrigued economists since at least Marx’s time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   6,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   8,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Bowles, S. 1985. The production process in a competitive economy: Walrasian, neo-Hobbesian and Marxian models. American Economic Review 75: 16–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowles, S., and H. Gintis. 1993. The revenge of homo economicus: Contested exchange and the revival of political economy. Journal of Economic Perspectives 7(1): 83–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braverman, H. 1974. Labor and monopoly capital. New York: Monthly Review Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, R. 1977. Contested terrain. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gachter, S., and E. Fehr. 2002. Fairness in labor markets: A survey of experimental results. In Surveys in experimental economics, ed. F. Bolle and M. Lehmann-Waffenschmidt. Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalecki, M. 1943. The political aspects of full employment. Political Quarterly 14: 322–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levine, D. 1989. Just-cause employment policies when unemployment is a worker discipline device. American Economic Review 79: 902–905.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K. 1867. Capital: A critique of political economy, 1906. New York: The Modern Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mokyr, J. 2002. The rise and fall of the factory system: Technology, firms and households since the Industrial Revolution. Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy 55: 1–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, C., and J. Stiglitz. 1984. Equilibrium unemployment as a worker discipline device. American Economic Review 74: 433–444.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, E. 1967. Time, work-discipline and industrial capitalism. Past and Present 38: 56–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Copyright information

© 2018 Macmillan Publishers Ltd.

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Matthews, P.H. (2018). Labour Discipline. In: The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_2605

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics