The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics

2018 Edition
| Editors: Macmillan Publishers Ltd

Methodological Individualism

  • Kaushik Basu
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_2585

Abstract

Methodological individualism holds that a proper explanation of a social regularity or phenomenon is grounded in individual motivations and behaviour. Although many economists claim to be methodological individualists, economics has always used social concepts and categories. As Schumpeter pointed out, nearly a century ago, price in a competitive model is an irreducibly social concept. Each individual takes the price as given but the price that comes to prevail is an outcome of the choices made by all individuals. Since Veblen, economists have increasingly recognized that individual preferences are endogenous and may be responsive to what happens in society at large.

Keywords

Arrow, K. Atomism Bertrand oligopoly Buchanan, J. Class interest Cournot oligopoly Dworkin, R. Endogenous preferences German school Hayek, F. A. Homo economicus vs. homo sociologicus Menger, C. Methodological holism Methodological individualism Normative individualism Schumpeter, J. Self-interest Smith, A. Veblen, T. Weber, M. 

JEL Classifications

B4 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Bibliography

  1. Arrow, K. 1994. Methodological individualism and social knowledge. American Economic Review 84: 1–10.Google Scholar
  2. Basu, K. 1989. A theory of association: Social status, prices and markets. Oxford Economic Papers 41: 653–671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Basu, K. 2000. Prelude to political economy: A study of the social and political foundations of economics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bhargava, R. 1993. Individualism in social science: Forms and limits of methodology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Buchanan, J. 1989. The state of economic science. In The state of economic science, ed. W. Sichel. Kalamazoo: Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.Google Scholar
  6. Dworkin, R. 1986. Law’s empire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Elster, J. 1982. Marxism, functionalism and game theory. Theory and Society 11: 453–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Menger, C. 1883. Investigations into the method of the social sciences with special reference to economics. English translation. New York: New York University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
  9. Roemer, J. 1981. Analytical foundations of Marxian economic theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Schumpeter, J. 1909. On the concept of social value. Quarterly Journal of Economics 23: 213–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Smith, A. 1776. Inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations, 1981. Indianapolis: Liberty Classics.Google Scholar
  12. Veblen, T. 1899. The theory of the leisure class. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  13. Von Hayek, F. 1942. Scientism and the study of science. Economica 9: 267–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Watkins, J. 1952. The principle of methodological individualism. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 3: 186–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Weber, M. 1922. Economy and society. Vol. 1. New York: Bedminster Press, 1968.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kaushik Basu
    • 1
  1. 1.