Globalization and Labour
The entry of China, India, and the ex-Soviet countries into the world trading system in the 1990s has made globalization an increasingly important driver of labour outcomes across the world. Through trade, capital flows, the spread of technology and education, the world has begun to move towards a truly global labour market. Still, the dispersion of wages for similar work across countries remains high and immigration is the least developed part of globalization, leaving considerable scope for national labour markets, policies, and institutions to affect wages and worker well-being into the foreseeable future.
KeywordsBrain drain Child labour Comparative advantage Cost of capital Diffusion of technology Factor endowments Factor mobility Factor price equalization Fair trade First-mover advantage Foreign direct investment Foreign portfolio investment Globalization Globalization and labour Heckscher–Ohlin trade theory Higher education Inequality (global) International migration International trade Labour standards North–South economic relations Occupational health and safety Price dispersion Product life cycle Production possibility frontier Purchasing power parity Ricardian trade theory Transfer of technology Wage dispersion
JEL ClassificationsF00 J00
- Bhagwati, J. 2000. Why Nike is on the right track. Financial Times, 1 May.Google Scholar
- Elliot, K., and R. Freeman. 2003. Can labor standards improve under globalization? Washingon, DC: Institute for international economics.Google Scholar
- Freeman, R. 2005a. The great doubling: America in the new global economy. Usery Lecture, Georgia State University, 8 April.Google Scholar
- Freeman, R. 2005b. What really ails Europe (and America): The doubling of the global workforce. The Globalist, 3 June.Google Scholar
- Gomory, R., and W. Baumol. 2000. Global trade and conflicting national interests. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Hail, L., and C. Leuz. 2004. International differences in the cost of equity capital: Do legal institutions and securities regulation matter? Working Paper 04–06, Wharton Financial Institutions Center, University of Pennsylvania. Online. Available at http://fic.wharton.upenn.edu/fic/papers/04/0406.pdf. Accessed 12 June 2007.
- Hiscox, M., and N. Smyth. 2005. Is there consumer demand for improved labor standards? Evidence from field experiments in social labeling. Harvard University. Online. Available at http://www.courses.fas.harvard.edu:9095/Bgov3009/Calendar/SocialLabeling_2.pdf. Accessed 17 June 2007.
- International Monetary Fund. 2007. World Economic Outlook database 2004. Online. Available at http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2004/01/data/index.htm. Accessed 12 June 2007.
- Mundell, R. 1957. International trade and factor mobility. American Economic Review 47: 321–335.Google Scholar
- Porter, A.L., J.D. Roessner, N. Newman, X.-Y. Jin, and D. Johnson. 2006. High tech indicators: Technology-based competitiveness of 33 nations: 2005 final report. Atlanta: Technology Policy and Assessment Center, Georgia Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
- Ruffin, R.J. 1999. The nature and significance of intra-industry trade. Economic and Financial Review. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas. Online. Available at http://www.dallasfed.org/research/efr/1999/efr9904a.pdf. Accessed 12 June 2007.
- Srinivasan, T.N. 1994. International labor standards once again! In International Labor Standards and Global Economic Integration: Proceedings of a Symposium, ed. G.K. Schoepfle and K.A. Swinnerton. Washington, DC: Bureau of International Labor Affairs, US Department of Labor.Google Scholar
- Trefler, D. 1995. The case of the missing trade and other mysteries. American Economic Review 85: 1029–1046.Google Scholar