The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics

2018 Edition
| Editors: Macmillan Publishers Ltd

Gender Differences (Experimental Evidence)

  • Catherine C. Eckel
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_2566

Abstract

Laboratory experiments find differences between women and men in three main areas: altruism, risk aversion and competition. The types of experiments and findings are described, and findings summarized. These results parallel similar findings in other social sciences, and are consistent with observed differences in the field.

Keywords

Altruism Altruism in experiments Charitable giving Competition Cooperation Dictator game Experimental economics Gender differences Gender gap Overconfidence Preference elicitation Risk aversion Social dilemma Ultimatum game Women’s work and wages 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access

Bibliography

  1. Andersen, S., G.W. Harrison, M.I. Lau, and E.E. Rutstrom. 2006. Eliciting risk and time preferences. Working Paper 05–24, Department of Economics, College of Business Administration, University of Central Florida.Google Scholar
  2. Andreoni, J., and L. Vesterlund. 2001. Which is the fair sex? Gender differences in altruism. Quarterly Journal of Economics 116: 293–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Babcock, L., and S. Laschever. 2003. Women don’t ask: Negotiation and the gender divide. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barber, B.M., and T. Odean. 2001. Boys will be boys: Gender, overconfidence and common stock investing. Quarterly Journal of Economics 116: 261–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Becker, G.M., M.H. DeGroot, and J. Marschak. 1964. Measuring utility by a single-response sequential method. Behavioral Science 9: 226–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Binswanger, H.P. 1980. Attitudes toward risk: Experimental measurement in rural India. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 62: 395–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Browne, K. 2002. Biology at work: rethinking sexual equality. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Byrnes, J., D.C. Miller, and W.D. Schafer. 1999. Gender differences in risk taking: A meta analysis. Psychological Bulletin 125: 367–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carpenter, J., and E. Seki. 2006. Competitive work environments and social preferences: Field experimental evidence from a Japanese fishing community. Contributions to Economic Analysis & Policy 5, Article 2. Abstract online. Available at http://www.bepress.com/bejeap/contributions/vol5/iss2/art2. Accessed 16 June 2007.
  10. Chauvin, K.W., and R.A. Ash. 1994. Gender earnings differentials in total pay, base pay, and contingent pay. Industrial and Labor Relations Review 47: 634–649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chen, Y., P. Katuscak, and E. Ozdenoren. 2005. Why can’t a woman bid more like a man? Working paper, University of Michigan.Google Scholar
  12. Committee on the Status of Women. 2007. Winter newsletter. Online. Available at http://www.cswep.org/newsletters/CSWEP_nsltr_Winter2007.pdf. Accessed 12 June 2007.
  13. Croson, R., and U. Gneezy. 2007. Gender differences in preferences. Working paper, University of California, San Diego.Google Scholar
  14. Dave, C., C.C. Eckel, C.A. Johnson, and C. Rojas. 2007. Eliciting risk preferences: Heterogeneity, stability and precision. Working paper, University of Texas at Dallas.Google Scholar
  15. Dickinson, D., and J. Tiefenthaler. 2002. What is fair? Experimental evidence. Southern Economic Journal 69: 414–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Eckel, C.C., and P.J. Grossman. 1998. Are women less selfish than men? Evidence from dictator games. Economic Journal 108: 726–735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Eckel, C.C., and P.J. Grossman. 2001. Chivalry and solidarity in ultimatum games. Economic Inquiry 39: 171–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Eckel, C.C., and P.J. Grossman. 2002. Sex differences and statistical stereotyping in attitudes toward financial risk. Evolution and Human Behavior 23: 281–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Eckel, C.C., and P.J. Grossman. 2003. Rebates versus matching: Does how we subsidize charitable contributions matter? Journal of Public Economics 87: 681–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Eckel, C.C., and P.J. Grossman. 2008a. Differences in the economic decisions of men and women: Experimental evidence. In Handbook of experimental economics results, ed. C. Plott and V.L. Smith. New York: Elsevier forthcoming.Google Scholar
  21. Eckel, C.C., and P.J. Grossman. 2008b. Men, women and risk aversion: Experimental evidence. In Handbook of experimental economics results, ed. C. Plott and V.L. Smith. New York: Elsevier forthcoming.Google Scholar
  22. Eckel, C.C., C.A. Johnson, C. Montmarquette, and C. Rojas. 2007. Debt aversion and the demand for loans for postsecondary education. Public Finance Review 35: 233–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gneezy, U., M. Niederle, and A. Ructichini. 2003. Performance in competitive environments: Gender differences. Quarterly Journal of Economics 118: 1049–1074.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gupta, N.D., A. Poulsen, and M.C. Villeval. 2005. Do (wo)men prefer (non) competitive jobs? Working paper, Institute for the Study of Lavoe (IZA).Google Scholar
  25. Helgesen, S. 1990. The female advantage: Women’s ways of leadership. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  26. Holt, C.A., and S.K. Laury. 2002. Risk aversion and incentive effects. American Economic Review 92: 1644–1655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Leete, L. 2000. Wage equity and employee motivation in nonprofit and for-profit organizations. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 43: 423–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Maccoby, E. 1998. The two sexes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Moore, E. 2002. An investigation into the demand for service contracts. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Economics, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.Google Scholar
  30. Niederle, M., and L. Vesterlund. 2007. Do women shy away from competition? Do men compete too much? Quarterly Journal of Economics 122(3), forthcoming.Google Scholar
  31. Rapoport, A., and A.M. Chammah. 1965. Sex differences in factors contributing to the level of cooperation in the prisoner’s dilemma game. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2: 831–838.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rhoads, S.E. 2004. Taking sex differences seriously. San Francisco: Encounter Books.Google Scholar
  33. Solnick, S. 2001. Gender differences in the ultimatum game. Economic Inquiry 39: 189–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Sunden, A.E., and B.J. Surette. 1998. Gender differences in the allocation of assets in retirement savings plans. American Economic Review 88: 207–211.Google Scholar
  35. Weichselbaumer, D., and R. Winter-Ebmer. 2005. A metaanalysis of the international gender wage gap. Journal of Economic Surveys 19: 479–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Catherine C. Eckel
    • 1
  1. 1.