Skip to main content

Family Decision Making

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Book cover The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics

Abstract

The classic unitary model assumes that households maximize a household utility function and implies resource ‘pooling’ – household behaviour does not depend on individuals’ control over resources within the household. Since the 1980s, economists have modified the unitary model in ways that have theoretical, empirical and practical implications. Non-unitary alternatives based on joint decision-making by individual family members with distinct preferences broaden the range of observable behaviour consistent with economic rationality. Many non-unitary models imply that both individuals’ control over resources and ‘environmental factors’ can affect intra-household allocation. Empirical evidence has consistently rejected income pooling and, hence, the unitary model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 6,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 8,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Attanasio, O., and V. Lechene. 2002. Tests of income pooling in household decisions. Review of Economic Dynamics 5: 720–748.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G.S. 1974. A theory of social interactions. Journal of Political Economy 82: 1063–1093.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G.S. 1981. Altruism in the family and selfishness in the market place. Economica 48: 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G.S. 1991. A treatise on the family. Enlarged ed. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergstrom, T. 1989. A fresh look at the rotten kid theorem and other household mysteries. Journal of Political Economy 97: 1138–1159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourguignon, F., M. Browning, P.-A. Chiappori, and V. Lechene. 1993. Intra household allocation of consumption: A model and some evidence from French data. Annales d’Economie et de Statistique 29: 138–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browning, M., and P.-A. Chiappori. 1998. Efficient intra-household allocations: A general characterization and empirical tests. Econometrica 66: 1241–1278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiappori, P.-A. 1988. Rational household labor supply. Econometrica 56: 63–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiappori, P.-A. 1992. Collective labor supply and welfare. Journal of Political Economy 100: 437–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duflo, E. 2000. Child health and household resources in South Africa: Evidence from the old age pension program. American Economic Review 90: 393–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haddad, L., and J. Hoddinott. 1994. Women’s income and boy–girl anthropometric status in the Côte d’Ivoire. World Development 22: 543–553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Konrad, K.A., and K.E. Lommerud. 2000. The bargaining family revisited. Canadian Journal of Economics 33: 471–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lundberg, S.J., and R.A. Pollak. 1993. Separate spheres bargaining and the marriage market. Journal of Political Economy 101: 988–1010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lundberg, S.J., and R.A. Pollak. 2003. Efficiency in marriage. Review of Economics of the Household 1: 153–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lundberg, S.J., R.A. Pollak, and T.J. Wales. 1997. Do husbands and wives pool their resources? Evidence from the United Kingdom child benefit. Journal of Human Resources 32: 463–480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manser, M., and M. Brown. 1980. Marriage and household decision-making: A bargaining analysis. International Economic Review 21: 31–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McElroy, M.B. 1990. The empirical content of Nash-bargained household behavior. Journal of Human Resources 25: 559–583.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McElroy, M.B., and M.J. Horney. 1981. Nash-bargained household decisions: Toward a generalization of the theory of demand. International Economic Review 22: 333–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nash, J. 1950. The bargaining problem. Econometrica 18: 155–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubalcava, L., G. Teruel, and D. Thomas. 2004. Spending, saving, and public transfers paid to women. California Center for Population Research. Online Working Paper Series. CCPR-024–04. Online. Available at http://www.ccpr.ucla.edu/ ccprwpseries/ccpr_024_04.pdf. Accessed 22 Apr 2007.

  • Samuelson, P.A. 1956. Social indifference curves. Quarterly Journal of Economics 70: 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, T.P. 1990. Testing the neoclassical model of family labor supply and fertility. Journal of Human Resources 25: 599–634.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, D. 1990. Intra-household resource allocation: An inferential approach. Journal of Human Resources 25: 635–664.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Udry, C. 1996. Gender, agricultural production and the theory of the household. Journal of Political Economy 104: 1010–1046.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Copyright information

© 2018 Macmillan Publishers Ltd.

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Lundberg, S., Pollak, R.A. (2018). Family Decision Making. In: The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_2551

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics