The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics

2018 Edition
| Editors: Macmillan Publishers Ltd

Gorman, W.M. (Terence)

  • Charles Blackorby
  • Daniel Primont
  • R. Robert Russell
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_2538

Abstract

W.M. (Terence) Gorman was a theorist’s theorist who nonetheless thought himself to be very practical. His contributions were brilliantly original – both in conception and in technical execution – but they often were a difficult read. We sketch below two of his lifelong interests – aggregation over agents and aggregation over commodities – and discuss briefly a few of his other contributions. We hope this brief outline will encourage others to peruse his works in more detail.

Keywords

Aggregation over agents Aggregation over commodities Cambridge School Capital aggregation Characteristics Closed form representation Compensation principle Concavity Diminishing marginal utility Duality Econometric Society Engel curve Equivalence scales Expected utility theory Expenditure function General equilibrium Gorman, W. M. Hotelling’s lemma Indirect utility functions Interpersonal utility comparisons Le Chatelier principle Marginal product of capital Price aggregation Profit functions Roy’s theorem Separability Two-stage budgeting 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access

Bibliography

  1. Barten, A. 1964. Family composition, prices, and expenditure patterns. In Econometric analysis for national economic planning, ed. P.E. Hart, G. Mills, and J.K. Whitaker. London: Butterworths.Google Scholar
  2. Blackorby, C., and B. Schworm. 1984. The structure of economies with aggregate measures of capital: A complete characterization. Review of Economic Studies 51: 633–650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Fisher, F.M., and J. Monz. 1992. Aggregate production functions and related topics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  4. Honohan, P., and J.P. Neary. 2003. W.M. Gorman. Economic and Social Review 34: 195–209.Google Scholar
  5. Kaldor, N. 1939. Welfare propositions of economics and interpersonal comparisons of utility. Economic Journal 49: 549–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Muellbauer, J. 1976. Community preference fields and the representative consumer. Econometrica 44: 979–999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Scitovsky, T. 1941. A note on welfare propositions in economics. Review of Economic Studies 9: 77–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Strotz, R. 1957. The empirical implications of a utility tree. Econometrica 25: 269–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Charles Blackorby
    • 1
  • Daniel Primont
    • 1
  • R. Robert Russell
    • 1
  1. 1.