Skip to main content

Entitlements in Laboratory Experiments

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics
  • 9 Accesses

Abstract

Entitlements are rights granted by contract, law or practice. Under the assumption of pure self-interest, modelling games with entitlements is fairly straightforward; however, work in behavioural economics has consistently demonstrated the existence of other-regarding preferences, with strong effects of perceptions of what is fair. In the laboratory, behaviour is affected not only by the entitlement per se but also by the procedure by which entitlements come about. One form of laboratory entitlement is a more advantageous position in an economic game, where the advantage arises from a larger endowment, favourable exchange rules or greater decision-making authority. A second type of entitlement is a guaranteed payoff or a payoff floor. Experimental results show that the means by which entitlements are acquired is one cue that influences the nature of other-regarding behaviour. This is important both for understanding behaviour and the design of experiments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 6,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 8,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Burrows, P., and G. Loomes. 1994. The impact of fairness on bargaining behavior. Empirical Economics 19: 201–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowles, S. and Gintis, H. 2001. The inheritance of economic status: Education, class and genetics. In Genetics, behavior and society, ed. M. Feldman. In International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences, ed. N. Smelser and P. Baltes. Oxford: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fong, C. 2001. Social preferences, self-interest, and the demand for redistribution. Journal of Public Economics 82: 225–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frohlich, N., and J.A. Oppenheimer. 1990. Choosing justice in experimental democracies with production. American Political Science Review 84: 461–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, E., and M.L. Spitzer. 1985. Entitlements, rights and fairness: An experimental examination of subjects’ concepts of distributive justice. Journal of Legal Studies 14: 259–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lissowski, G., T. Tyszka, and W. Okrasa. 1991. Principles of distributive justice: Experiments in Poland and America. Journal of Conflict Resolution 35: 98–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. 1971. A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Belknap, Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Copyright information

© 2018 Macmillan Publishers Ltd.

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Ball, S. (2018). Entitlements in Laboratory Experiments. In: The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_2518

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics