Skip to main content

Income Taxation and Optimal Policies

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics
  • 25 Accesses

Abstract

Various economic literatures address the question whether first-best prescriptions for government policy require modification because redistributive income taxation distorts labour supply and cannot achieve the distributive ideal. Perhaps second-best rules for public goods provision, corrective taxation, public sector pricing, and other government activity should reflect concerns about distribution and labour supply distortion. Recent work demonstrates, however, that in basic cases first-best principles remain applicable. Demonstrations make use of income tax adjustments that preserve not only budget balance but also the pre-reform distribution of utility.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 6,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 8,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Atkinson, A., and N. Stern. 1974. Pigou, taxation, and public goods. Review of Economic Studies 41: 119–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, A., and J. Stiglitz. 1976. The design of tax structure: Direct versus indirect taxation. Journal of Public Economics 6: 55–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ballard, C., and D. Fullerton. 1992. Distortionary taxes and the provision of public goods. Journal of Economic Perspectives 6: 117–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boadway, R., and M. Keen. 1993. Public goods, self-selection and optimal income taxation. International Economic Review 34: 463–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bös, D. 1985. Public sector pricing. In Handbook of public economics, ed. A. Auerbach and M. Feldstein, Vol. 1. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bovenberg, A., and L. Goulder. 2002. Environmental taxation and regulation. In Handbook of public economics, ed. A. Auerbach and M. Feldstein, Vol. 3. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christiansen, V. 1981. Evaluation of public projects under optimal taxation. Review of Economic Studies 48: 447–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corlett, W., and D. Hague. 1953. Complementarity and the excess burden of taxation. Review of Economic Studies 21: 21–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, P. 1975. A many-person Ramsey tax rule. Journal of Public Economics 4: 283–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, P., and J. Mirrlees. 1971. Optimal taxation and public production. II: Tax rules. American Economic Review 61: 261–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drèze, J., and N. Stern. 1987. The theory of cost–benefit analysis. In Handbook of public economics, ed. A. Auerbach and M. Feldstein, Vol. 2. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldstein, M. 1972. Equity and efficiency in public sector pricing: The optimal twopart tariff. Quarterly Journal of Economics 86: 175–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goulder, L. 2002. Environmental policy making in economies with prior tax distortions. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hylland, A., and R. Zeckhauser. 1979. Distributional objectives should affect taxes but not program choice or design. Scandinavian Journal of Economics 81: 264–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplow, L. 1996. The optimal supply of public goods and the distortionary cost of taxation. National Tax Journal 49: 513–533.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplow, L. 2004. On the (ir)relevance of distribution and labor supply distortion to government policy. Journal of Economic Perspectives 18: 59–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplow, L. 2006. On the undesirability of commodity taxation even when income taxation is not optimal. Journal of Public Economics 90: 1235–1250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplow, L. 2008. The theory of taxation and public economics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipsey, R., and K. Lancaster. 1956. The general theory of second best. Review of Economic Studies 24: 11–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mirrlees, J. 1971. An exploration in the theory of optimum income taxation. Review of Economic Studies 68: 175–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pigou, A. 1920. The economics of welfare. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pigou, A. 1928. A study in public finance. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsey, F. 1927. A contribution to the theory of taxation. Economic Journal 37: 47–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, P. 1954. The pure theory of public expenditure. Review of Economics and Statistics 36: 387–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shavell, S. 1981. A note on efficiency vs. distributional equity in legal rulemaking: Should distributional equity matter given optimal income taxation? American Economic Review 71: 414–418.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, J., and P. Dasgupta. 1971. Differential taxation, public goods, and economic efficiency. Review of Economic Studies 38: 151–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weisbrod, B. 1968. Income redistribution effects and cost–benefit analysis. In Problems in public expenditure analysis, ed. S. Chase. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Copyright information

© 2018 Macmillan Publishers Ltd.

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Kaplow, L. (2018). Income Taxation and Optimal Policies. In: The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_2489

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics