The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics

2018 Edition
| Editors: Macmillan Publishers Ltd

Heterodox Economics

  • Frederic S. Lee
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_2487

Abstract

Although ‘heterodox economics’ is a widely used term, precisely what it means is debated. I argue that heterodox economics refers to a body of economic theories that holds an alternative position vis-à-vis mainstream economics; to a community of heterodox economists who identify themselves as such and embrace a pluralistic attitude towards heterodox theories without rejecting contestability and incommensurability among heterodox theories; and to the development of a coherent economic theory that draws upon various theoretical contributions by heterodox approaches which stand in contrast to mainstream theory.

Keywords

Association for Heterodox Economics Austrian economics Capitalism Class Evolutionary economics Feminist economics Heterodox economics Institutional economics Interdependencies Marxian economics Post Keynesian economics Radical economics Scarcity Social economics Sraffian economics Pluralism Political economy Mainstream economics Social provisioning 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access

Bibliography

  1. Bortis, H. 1997. Institutions, behaviour and economic theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Dow, S.C. 2000. Prospects for the progress of heterodox economics. Journal of the History of Economic Thought 22: 157–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Granovetter, M. 1985. Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology 91: 481–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Gruchy, A.G. 1987. The reconstruction of economics: An analysis of the fundamentals of institutional economics. New York: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
  5. Keen, S. 2001. Debunking economics: The naked emperor of the social sciences. New York City: St Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
  6. Lavoie, M. 2006. Do heterodox theories have anything in common? A Post-Keynesian point of view. International Journal of Ecodynamics 3: 87–112.Google Scholar
  7. Lawson, T. 1997. Economics and reality. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Lee, F.S. 2001. Conference of socialist economists and the emergence of heterodox economics in post-war Britain. Capital & Class 75: 15–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Lee, F.S. 2002. The association for heterodox economics: Past, present, and future. Journal of Australian Political Economy 50: 29–43.Google Scholar
  10. Lee, F.S. 2004. To be a heterodox economist: the contested landscape of American economics, 1960s and 1970s. Journal of Economic Issues 38: 747–763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lee, F.S., and S. Keen. 2004. The incoherent emperor: A heterodox critique of neoclassical microeconomic theory. Review of Social Economy 62: 169–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lee, F.S., S. Cohen, G. Schneider, and P. Quick. 2005. Informational directory for heterodox economists: Journals, book series, websites, and graduate and undergraduate programs. 2nd ed. Kansas City: Department of Economics, University of Missouri-Kansas City . Online. Available at http://l.web.umkc.edu/leefs/htnf/HeterodoxDirectory.pdf. Accessed 12 Jan 2007.Google Scholar
  13. Matthaei, J. 1984. Rethinking scarcity: Neoclassicism, neoMalthusianism, and neoMarxism. Review of Radical Political Economics 16: 81–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. O’Hara, P.A., eds. 1999. Encyclopedia of political economy. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  15. O’Hara, P.A. 2000. Marx, Veblen, and contemporary institutional political economy: Principles and unstable dynamics of capitalism. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  16. O’Hara, P.A. 2002. The role of institutions and the current crises of capitalism: A reply to Howard Sherman and John Henry. Review of Social Economy 60: 609–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Power, M. 2004. Social provisioning as a starting point for feminist economics. Feminist Economics 10: 3–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. White, G. 2004. Capital, distribution and macroeconomics: ‘Core’ beliefs and theoretical foundations. Cambridge Journal of Economics 28: 527–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Wrenn, M.V. 2004. What is heterodox economics? Ph.D. thesis, Colorado State University.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Frederic S. Lee
    • 1
  1. 1.