Skip to main content

Capital Theory

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics
  • 130 Accesses

Abstract

Capital theory examines the special role played by time in resource allocation studies. The determination of the interest rate and functional distribution of income as well as how rational agents invest are analysed within single- and multi-sector general equilibrium frameworks. Here, agents exercise perfect foresight over alternative consumption and capital accumulation programs. Efficient programs are characterized. Representative and multi-agent infinitely lived households are studied. Equivalence principles link the equilibrium programs and optimal paths. Heterogeneous agent models with borrowing constraints are reviewed. A behavioural model of intertemporal choice is also compared to its constant discounting counterpart.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 6,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 8,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Ainslie, G. 1991. Derivation of ‘rational’ economic behavior from hyperbolic discount curves. American Economic Review 81: 334–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barro, R.J. 1999. Ramsey meets Laibson in the neoclassical growth model. Quarterly Journal of Economics 114: 1125–1152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beals, R., and T.C. Koopmans. 1969. Maximizing stationary utility in a constant technology. SIAM Journal of Applied Mathematics 17: 1001–1015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, R.A. 1980. On the long–run steady state in a simple dynamic model of equilibrium with heterogeneous households. Quarterly Journal of Economics 95: 375–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, R.A. 2006. Equilibrium dynamics with many agents. In Handbook of Optimal Growth Theory, Volume I: Discrete Time Theory, ed. C. Le Van, R.A. Dana, T. Mitra, and K. Nishimura. New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, R.A., and J.H. Boyd. 1997. Capital Theory, Equilibrium Analysis, and Recursive Utility. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, R.A., and C. Foias. 1987. A characterization of Ramsey equilibrium. Journal of Economic Theory 41: 173–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, R.A., and M. Majumdar. 1989. Optimality and decentralization in infinite horizon economies. In Joan Robinson and Modern Economic Theory, ed. G.R. Feiwel. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birner, J. 2002. The Cambridge Controversies in Capital Theory: A Study in the Logic of Theory Development. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bliss, C.J. 1975. Capital Theory and the Distribution of Income. Amsterdam: North-Holland/America Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boldrin, M., and M. Woodford. 1990. Equilibrium in models displaying fluctuations and chaos: a survey. Journal of Monetary Economics 25: 189–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brock, W.A., and L.J. Mirman. 1972. Optimal growth and uncertainty: the discounted case. Journal of Economic Theory 4: 479–513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burgstaller, A. 1995. Property and Prices: Toward a Unified Theory of Value. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burmeister, E. 1980. Capital Theory and Dynamics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cass, D. 1972. On capital overaccumulation in the aggregative model of economic growth: a complete characterization. Journal of Economic Theory 4: 200–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, F.R. 2004. Stochastic Optimization in Continuous Time. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Conrad, J.M., and C.W. Clark. 1987. Natural Resource Economics: Notes and Problems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dixit, A.K. 1976. The Theory of Equilibrium Growth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorfman, R., P.A. Samuelson, and R.M. Solow. 1958. Linear Programs and Economic Analysis. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, L.G. 1983. Stationary cardinal utility and optimal growth under uncertainty. Journal of Economic Theory 31: 133–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, L.G., and J.A. Hynes. 1983. The rate of time preference and dynamic economic analysis. Journal of Political Economy 91: 611–635.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, I. 1907. The Rate of Interest. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frederick, S., G. Loewenstein, and T. O’Donoghue. 2002. Time discounting and time preference: a critical review. Journal of Economic Literature 40: 351–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goetzmann, W.N., and K.G. Rouwenhorst. 2005. The Origins of Value: The Financial Innovations That Created Modern Capital Markets. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harcourt, G.C. 1972. Some cambridge controversies in the theory of capital. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hartley, J.E. 1997. The representative agent in macroeconomics. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hotelling, H. 1931. The economics of exhaustible resources. Journal of Political Economy 39: 137–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koopmans, T.C. 1958. Three essays on the state of economic science. New York: McGraw–Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krusell, P., B. Kuruscu, and A.A. Smith. 2002. Equilibrium welfare and government policy with quasigeometric discounting. Journal of Economic Theory 105: 42–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laibson, D. 1997. Golden eggs and hyperbolic discounting. Quarterly Journal of Economics 112: 443–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le Van, C., and Y. Vailakis. 2003. Existence of a competitive equilibrium in a one–sector growth model with heterogeneous agents and irreversible investment. Economic Theory 22: 743–771.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, R.E., and N.L. Stokey. 1984. Optimal growth with many consumers. Journal of Economic Theory 32: 139–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malinvaud, E. 1953. Capital accumulation and efficient allocation of resources. Econometrica 21: 233–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKenzie, L.W. 1986. Optimal economic growth, turnpike theorems and comparative dynamics. In Handbook of mathematical economics, ed. K. Arrow and M.D. Intriligator, Vol. 3. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKenzie, L.W. 1987. Turnpike theory. In The New Palgrave: A dictionary of economics, ed. J. Eatwell, M. Milgate, and P. Newman, Vol. 4. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mirman, L.J., and I. Zilcha. 1975. Optimal growth under uncertainty. Journal of Economic Theory 11: 329–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phelps, E.S. 1966. Golden rules of economic growth. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phelps, E.S., and R. Pollak. 1968. On second-best national saving and gameequilibrium growth. Review of Economic Studies 35: 185–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radner, R. 1961. Paths of economic growth that are optimal with regard only to final states. Review of Economic Studies 28: 98–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rae, J. 1834. Statements of some new principles on the subject of political economy. Reprinted 1964. New York: Augustus M. Kelley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsey, F.P. 1928. A mathematical theory of saving. Economic Journal 38: 543–559.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schefold, B. 1997. Normal prices, technical change and accumulation. London: Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Solow, R.M. 1956. A contribution to the theory of economic growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics 70: 65–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sraffa, P. 1960. Production of commodities by means of commodities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stokey, N.L. and Lucas, R.E., with Prescott, E. 1989. recursive methods in economic dynamics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strotz, R.H. 1955. Myopia and inconsistency in dynamic utility maximization. Review of Economic Studies 11: 165–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tirole, J. 1990. Intertemporal efficiency, intergenerational transfers, and asset pricing: an introduction. In Essays in honor of Edmond Malinvaud, vol I: Microeconomics, ed. P. Champsaur et al. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Neumann, J. 1937. Über ein Ökonomisches Gleichungssystem une eine Verallgemeinerung des Brouwerschen Fixpunksatzes. Ergebnisse eines mathematischen Kolloquiums 8, 73–83. Review of Economic Studies 13(1945): 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weitzman, M.L. 2003. Income, wealth, and the maximum principle. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Copyright information

© 2018 Macmillan Publishers Ltd.

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Becker, R.A. (2018). Capital Theory. In: The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_2448

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics