Skip to main content

State Capture and Corruption in Transition Economies

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
  • 64 Accesses

Abstract

State capture by industrial lobbyists is a significant obstacle to normal economic development of formerly command (socialist) economies, at both the local and the national levels. It is prevalent in transition economics because of an excessively concentrated industrial structure and low labour mobility, both horizontal and vertical, a high level of discretion of public officials in economic affairs, and generally weak political institutions. Most of these features might be traced back to the pre-transition legacy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   6,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   8,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Bardhan, P., and D. Mookherjee. 2000. Capture and governance at local and national levels. American Economic Review 90: 135–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bardhan, P., and D. Mookherjee. 2006. Decentralization, corruption and government accountability: An overview. In Handbook of economic corruption, ed. S. Rose- Ackerman. Northampton: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaddy, C., and B. Ickes. 2002. Russia’s virtual economy. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, G., and E. Helpman. 2001. Special interest politics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hellman, J., G. Jones, and D. Kaufmann. 2003. Seize the state, seize the day: State capture and influence in transition economies. Journal of Comparative Economics 31: 751–773.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Persson, T., and G. Tabellini. 2000. Political economics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polishchuk, L., and A. Savvateev. 2004. Spontaneous (non)emergence of property rights. Economics of Transition 12: 103–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qian, Y., and B. Weingast. 1997. Federalism as a commitment to preserving market incentives. Journal of Economic Perspectives 11(4): 83–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roland, G. 2000. Transition and economics: Politics, markets, and firms. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose-Ackerman, S. 1999. Corruption and government: Causes, consequences, and reform. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Shleifer, A., and R. Vishny. 1993. Corruption. Quarterly Journal of Economics 108: 601–617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slinko, I., E. Yakovlev, and E. Zhuravskaya. 2005. Laws for sale: Evidence from Russia. American Law and Economics Review 7: 284–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sonin, K. 2003. Why the rich may favor poor protection of property right. Journal of Comparative Economics 31: 715–731.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tiebout, C. 1956. A pure theory of local expenditures. Journal of Political Economy 64: 416–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Copyright information

© 2018 Macmillan Publishers Ltd.

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Sonin, K. (2018). State Capture and Corruption in Transition Economies. In: The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_2426

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics