Skip to main content

Law of Demand

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Book cover The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics

Abstract

We formulate several laws of individual and market demand and describe their relationship to neoclassical demand theory. The laws have implications for comparative statics and stability of competitive equilibrium. We survey results that offer interpretable sufficient conditions for the laws to hold and we refer to related empirical evidence. The laws for market demand are more likely to be satisfied if commodities are more substitutable. Certain kinds of heterogeneity across individuals make the laws more likely to hold in the aggregate even if they are violated by individuals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 6,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 8,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Baruch, S., and Y. Kannai. 2002. Inferior goods, Giffen goods, and shochu. In Economics essays, ed. G. Debreu, W. Neuefeind, and W. Trockel. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bewley, T. 1977. The permanent income hypothesis: A theoretical formulation. Journal of Economic Theory 16: 252–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brighi, L. 2004. A stronger criterion for the weak weak axiom. Journal of Mathematical Economics 40: 93–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiappori, P.-A. 1985. Distribution of income and the ‘law of demand’. Econometrica 53: 109–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chipman, J. 1977. An empirical implication of Auspitz–Lieben–Edgeworth–Pareto complementarity. Journal of Economic Theory 14: 228–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evstigneev, I.V., W. Hildenbrand, and M. Jerison. 1997. Metonymy and cross-section demand. Journal of Mathematical Economics 28: 397–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freixas, X., and A. Mas-Colell. 1987. Engel curves leading to the weak axiom in the aggregate. Econometrica 55: 515–531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giraud, G., and J.K.H. Quah. 2003. Homothetic or Cobb–Douglas behavior through aggregation. Contributions to Theoretical Economics 3(1), Article 8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grandmont, J.M. 1987. Distribution of preferences and the ‘law of demand’. Econometrica 55: 155–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grandmont, J.M. 1992. Transformations of the commodity space, behavioral heterogeneity, and the aggregation problem. Journal of Economic Theory 57: 1–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Härdle, W., W. Hildenbrand, and M. Jerison. 1991. Empirical evidence on the law of demand. Econometrica 59: 1525–1549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Härdle, W., and T. Stoker. 1989. Investigating smooth multiple regression by the method of average derivatives. Journal of the American Statistical Association 84: 986–995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hildenbrand, W. 1983. On the law of demand. Econometrica 51: 997–1019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hildenbrand, W. 1994. Market demand. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hildenbrand, W., and A. Kirman. 1988. Equilibrium analysis. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hildenbrand, W., and A. Kneip. 1993. Family expenditure data, heterscedasticity and the law of demand. Ricerche Economiche 47: 137–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jerison, M. 1999. Dispersed excess demands, the weak axiom, and uniqueness of equilibrium. Journal of Mathematical Economics 31: 15–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jerison, M. 2001. Demand dispersion, metonymy and ideal panel data. In Economics essays, ed. G. Debreu, W. Neuefeind, and W. Trockel. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kannai, Y. 1989. A Characterization of monotone individual demand functions. Journal of Mathematical Economics 18: 87–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kihlstrom, R., A. Mas-Colell, and H. Sonnenschein. 1976. The demand theory of the weak axiom of revealed preference. Econometrica 44: 971–978.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mas-Colell, A. 1991. On the uniqueness of equilibrium once again. In Equilibrium theory and applications, ed. W. Barnett et al. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mas-Colell, A., M.D. Whinston, and J.R. Green. 1995. Microeconomic theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milleron, J.C. 1974. Unicité et stabilité de l’équilibre en économie de distribution. Unpublished seminar paper, Séminaire d’Econométrie Roy-Malinvaud. Paris: CNRS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitjuschin, L.G., and W.M. Polterovich. 1978. Criteria for monotonicity of demand functions. Ekonomika i Matematicheskie Metody 14: 122–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quah, J.K.-H. 1997. The law of demand when income is price dependent. Econometrica 65: 1421–1442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quah, J.K.-H. 2000. The monotonicity of individual and market demand. Econometrica 68: 911–930.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quah, J.K.-H. 2003. The law of demand and risk aversion. Econometrica 71: 713–721.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, J.E. 1987. The causes and consequences of the dependence of quality on price. Journal of Economic Literature 25(1): 1–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vives, X. 1987. Small income effects: A Marshallian theory of consumer surplus and downward sloping demand. Review of Economic Studies 54: 87–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Copyright information

© 2018 Macmillan Publishers Ltd.

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Jerison, M., Quah, J.K.H. (2018). Law of Demand. In: The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_2413

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics