The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics

2018 Edition
| Editors: Macmillan Publishers Ltd

Trend/Cycle Decomposition

  • Charles R. Nelson
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_2396

Abstract

The decomposition of economic time series is motivated by the idea that distinct forces account for long-term growth, for variation over a time frame associated with the business cycle, and though the seasons. While the latter is typically suppressed by ‘seasonal adjustment’, the issue of how to separate trend from cycle in series such as GDP has been hotly debated since the 1970s and remains unsettled. Surprisingly varied patterns follow from alternative approaches, some placing the bulk of variation into the cycle/trend following a smooth line, others attributing shifts in level to ‘permanent shocks’ to the trend.

Keywords

ARMA models Business cycles Ergodicity Filtering Identification Kalman filter Random walks Trend/cycle decomposition Unobserved components models 

JEL Classifications

C1 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Bibliography

  1. Beveridge, S., and C.R. Nelson. 1981. A new approach to decomposition of economic time series into permanent and transitory components with particular attention to measurement of the business cycle. Journal of Monetary Economics 7: 151–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Clark, P.K. 1987. The cyclical component of U.S. economic activity. Quarterly Journal of Economics 102: 797–814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Harvey, A.C. 1985. Trends and cycles in macroeconomic time series. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 3: 216–227.Google Scholar
  4. Hodrick, R.J., and E.C. Prescott. 1980. Postwar US business cycles: An empirical investigation, Working paper. Pittsburgh: Carnegie-Mellon University.Google Scholar
  5. Hodrick, R.J., and E.C. Prescott. 1997. Postwar U.S. business cycles: An empirical investigation. Journal of Money Credit and Banking 29: 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Morley, J.C., C.R. Nelson, and E. Zivot. 2003. Why are the Beveridge–Nelson and unobserved-components decompositions of GDP so different? Review of Economics and Statistics 85: 235–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Perron, P. 1989. The great crash, the oil price shock, and the unit root hypothesis. Econometrica 57: 1361–1401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Charles R. Nelson
    • 1
  1. 1.